The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 38610, Blue Mountain, Mississippi is 19 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 86.38 percent of the residents in 38610 has some form of health insurance. 46.66 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 58.35 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 38610 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 933 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 38610. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 655 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 677 health care providers accessible to residents in 38610, Blue Mountain, Mississippi.
Health Scores in 38610, Blue Mountain, Mississippi
Overall Health Score | 27 |
---|---|
People Score | 36 |
Provider Score | 19 |
Hospital Score | 62 |
Travel Score | 41 |
38610 | Blue Mountain | Mississippi | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 534.58 | 11,008.76 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 2,013.65 | 41,274.18 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 2,625.95 | 54,946.56 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Blue Mountain, MS (ZIP Code 38610)
Assessing the overall health landscape within ZIP Code 38610, encompassing Blue Mountain, Mississippi, requires a multifaceted approach. We must examine the availability and quality of primary care physicians, the utilization of telemedicine, the presence of mental health resources, and the physician-to-patient ratio. This analysis will provide a comprehensive 'Overall Health Score' reflecting the community's access to and quality of healthcare services.
The foundation of any healthy community rests on the availability of primary care physicians. Within Blue Mountain, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical metric. While precise figures fluctuate, a rural area like this likely faces challenges compared to more urban centers. A lower ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potential strain on existing healthcare providers. This scarcity can disproportionately affect vulnerable populations, exacerbating existing health disparities.
Identifying standout practices is crucial. These clinics and individual physicians often serve as beacons of quality care within the community. Factors to consider include patient satisfaction ratings, the range of services offered, the adoption of technology for patient management and communication, and the clinic's commitment to preventative care initiatives. Practices that actively participate in community outreach programs and prioritize patient education are particularly valuable. Evaluating these aspects helps pinpoint the strengths within the local healthcare ecosystem.
Telemedicine adoption is another key indicator of healthcare accessibility. The ability to consult with a physician remotely, particularly for follow-up appointments, medication management, and certain specialist consultations, can significantly improve access to care, especially for residents in rural areas with limited mobility or transportation options. Assessing the availability of telemedicine services, the types of services offered, and the ease of use for patients are crucial aspects of this evaluation. Practices that embrace telemedicine demonstrate a commitment to patient convenience and proactive healthcare delivery.
Mental health resources are an essential component of overall health. The availability of psychiatrists, therapists, counselors, and support groups within the community directly impacts the mental well-being of residents. Evaluating the number of mental health professionals, the range of services offered (e.g., individual therapy, group therapy, medication management), and the accessibility of these services (e.g., insurance acceptance, sliding scale fees) is paramount. Furthermore, the presence of community-based mental health programs and partnerships with local schools and organizations enhances the overall mental health infrastructure.
The quality of care within the 38610 ZIP code is also influenced by several other factors. These include the presence of a local hospital or clinic, the availability of specialized medical services, the quality of the local emergency medical services (EMS), and the overall health literacy of the community. A comprehensive assessment must consider these elements to provide a holistic understanding of the healthcare landscape. The integration of these factors allows for a more accurate 'Overall Health Score' determination.
Data collection for this analysis requires a multi-pronged approach. Information can be gathered from publicly available sources such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), state health departments, and local healthcare providers. Patient reviews and testimonials, while subjective, provide valuable insights into patient experiences. Surveys and interviews with community members can also offer valuable qualitative data. Combining quantitative data (e.g., physician-to-patient ratios) with qualitative data (e.g., patient satisfaction) creates a more nuanced and comprehensive assessment.
The 'Overall Health Score' itself should be a composite measure, reflecting the performance across all the key indicators discussed. A scoring system, such as a weighted average, can be used to assign points to each category (e.g., physician-to-patient ratio, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources). The weights assigned to each category should reflect their relative importance in contributing to overall health outcomes. The final score will then provide a snapshot of the health of the community.
Analyzing the data and generating the 'Overall Health Score' will highlight areas of strength and weakness within the healthcare system of Blue Mountain. The findings can be used to identify opportunities for improvement, such as increasing the number of primary care physicians, expanding telemedicine services, or enhancing mental health resources. The results can also inform healthcare policy decisions and guide resource allocation to address specific needs within the community.
Understanding the healthcare landscape within 38610 is crucial for residents, healthcare providers, and policymakers. This analysis provides a framework for assessing the quality and accessibility of healthcare services, identifying areas for improvement, and ultimately, promoting a healthier community. The 'Overall Health Score' serves as a valuable tool for monitoring progress and advocating for better healthcare outcomes.
To gain a visual understanding of the healthcare landscape in Blue Mountain and explore the spatial distribution of healthcare resources, consider using CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can provide a detailed, geographically-based view of the healthcare ecosystem, allowing you to visualize physician locations, hospital proximity, and other critical data points.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like