38619, Como, Mississippi Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 38619, Como, Mississippi is 12 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 89.83 percent of the residents in 38619 has some form of health insurance. 54.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 49.86 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 38619 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,163 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 38619. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,033 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 852 health care providers accessible to residents in 38619, Como, Mississippi.

**Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 38619 and Primary Care Availability in Como**

This analysis provides an in-depth assessment of the overall health landscape within ZIP code 38619, encompassing the town of Como, Mississippi, focusing on the availability and quality of primary care services. We will delve into various factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, notable medical practices, telemedicine integration, and mental health resources, to arrive at a comprehensive ‘Overall Health Score.’ This score will reflect the accessibility and quality of healthcare available to residents.

The foundation of a healthy community rests on the accessibility of primary care physicians. In Como (38619), the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator. While precise, real-time data fluctuates, a low ratio (meaning a higher number of patients per doctor) can signal potential challenges in accessing timely appointments and comprehensive care. This can lead to delayed diagnoses, untreated chronic conditions, and a generally lower level of preventative care. Conversely, a favorable ratio suggests a greater ability for residents to establish and maintain relationships with primary care providers. This is a key component of the overall health score.

Evaluating the standout practices within the area requires a multi-faceted approach. Factors such as patient reviews, the range of services offered, and the adoption of modern technologies are crucial. Practices that prioritize patient communication, offer extended hours, and integrate electronic health records (EHRs) generally receive higher ratings. The presence of specialists within a practice or the ability to easily refer patients to specialists also influences the assessment. Practices actively involved in community health initiatives or those accepting a wide range of insurance plans further contribute to a positive score.

Telemedicine adoption represents a significant element in modern healthcare. Its ability to bridge geographical barriers and enhance access to care, especially for those with mobility issues or in rural areas, is undeniable. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient portals score higher in this category. The availability of telemedicine can dramatically improve the overall health score by increasing access to care and improving patient convenience.

Mental health resources are an essential component of overall well-being. The availability of mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and licensed therapists, is crucial. The presence of support groups, mental health awareness programs, and partnerships with local mental health organizations also contribute to a more robust mental health infrastructure. The integration of mental health services within primary care settings, such as offering on-site counseling or facilitating referrals to mental health specialists, is particularly beneficial. A community with strong mental health resources will naturally have a higher overall health score.

The overall health score for 38619, considering these factors, is likely to be influenced by the availability of resources and the demographics of the area. Factors such as poverty levels, access to transportation, and the prevalence of chronic diseases can impact the overall health score. A community with a high percentage of elderly residents, for example, may require more specialized geriatric care, influencing the overall score.

The assessment of the overall health score also considers the efficiency of the healthcare system. This includes the ease of scheduling appointments, the wait times for appointments, and the availability of after-hours care. A well-functioning system will have streamlined processes and prioritize patient convenience, contributing to a higher score. The use of technology, such as online appointment scheduling and patient portals, can significantly improve efficiency.

The quality of care provided by physicians is paramount. This involves evaluating the qualifications and experience of the physicians, as well as their commitment to providing evidence-based care. Practices that adhere to established clinical guidelines, participate in quality improvement initiatives, and demonstrate a commitment to continuing medical education will receive higher ratings. Patient satisfaction surveys and feedback mechanisms are also important indicators of quality.

Furthermore, the overall health score considers the availability of preventative care services. This includes routine checkups, vaccinations, screenings for chronic diseases, and patient education programs. Communities that prioritize preventative care tend to have better health outcomes and lower healthcare costs. The presence of community health programs and outreach initiatives can significantly improve the overall health score.

The overall health score is not a static number; it can change over time as the healthcare landscape evolves. Regular assessments are necessary to identify areas for improvement and to track progress. This involves monitoring key indicators, such as physician-to-patient ratios, access to mental health services, and the adoption of telemedicine. Data-driven decision-making is essential for improving the overall health score.

In conclusion, the overall health score for 38619 and the primary care availability in Como are influenced by a complex interplay of factors. Physician-to-patient ratios, the quality of medical practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources all play a crucial role. Continuous monitoring and improvement efforts are essential to ensure that residents have access to high-quality, accessible healthcare.

To visualize the healthcare landscape and gain a deeper understanding of the factors impacting the overall health score in 38619, explore the interactive maps and data visualizations provided by CartoChrome. Their platform offers valuable insights into healthcare access and resource distribution within the community.