38621, Crenshaw, Mississippi Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 38621, Crenshaw, Mississippi is 13 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 82.03 percent of the residents in 38621 has some form of health insurance. 64.40 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 26.49 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 38621 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 736 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 38621. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 311 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 825 health care providers accessible to residents in 38621, Crenshaw, Mississippi.

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 38621 and Primary Care Availability in Crenshaw

This analysis provides an assessment of the overall health landscape within ZIP code 38621, focusing on physician availability and healthcare resources, and contrasts it with the primary care situation in Crenshaw. We will delve into various factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, notable medical practices, telemedicine integration, and the availability of mental health support. This comprehensive evaluation aims to provide a clear understanding of the healthcare access and quality within these areas.

The healthcare environment in ZIP code 38621, which encompasses the town of Coldwater, Mississippi, presents a unique set of challenges and opportunities. The rural nature of the area can impact the availability of healthcare professionals. A crucial metric to examine is the physician-to-patient ratio. This ratio indicates the number of residents served by each physician, and a higher ratio often suggests potential difficulties in accessing timely medical care. Data regarding this specific ZIP code needs to be acquired from reliable sources like the U.S. Census Bureau, the Mississippi State Department of Health, and the American Medical Association. However, based on general trends in rural areas, it is likely that 38621 faces a lower physician density compared to more urban centers.

Assessing the quality of care extends beyond simple physician numbers. The presence of standout practices is a significant factor. These practices often distinguish themselves through their commitment to patient-centered care, advanced technologies, and specialized services. Identifying these practices requires examining patient reviews, evaluating the scope of services offered, and assessing the integration of innovative healthcare solutions. Are there any local hospitals or clinics? Are they well-equipped and staffed? Do they offer a range of specialties, or is primary care the primary focus? This information is vital in understanding the overall healthcare ecosystem within the ZIP code.

Telemedicine, the use of technology to provide healthcare remotely, has become increasingly important, especially in rural areas. Its adoption can significantly improve access to care, particularly for patients who face geographical barriers or mobility limitations. Evaluating the adoption of telemedicine within 38621 involves determining which practices offer telehealth services, the types of services available (e.g., virtual consultations, remote monitoring), and the ease with which patients can access these services. The presence of reliable internet infrastructure is also a crucial factor, as it directly impacts the feasibility and effectiveness of telemedicine.

Mental health resources are an essential component of overall health. The availability of mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and therapists, is critical for addressing mental health concerns within the community. This includes assessing the number of mental health providers, the types of services offered (e.g., individual therapy, group therapy, medication management), and the affordability and accessibility of these services. Are there any local mental health clinics or support groups? Are mental health services integrated into primary care practices? These questions are essential to understanding the mental health landscape in the area.

In contrast to 38621, the primary care availability in Crenshaw, which is a small unincorporated community in the same county, can be assessed. While the specific data might vary, the general dynamics of rural healthcare apply. The physician-to-patient ratio is likely to be a key indicator. The availability of primary care physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants directly impacts the community's ability to access routine medical care. Information on the number of primary care providers and their patient load is crucial.

The presence of any primary care clinics or practices in Crenshaw is another important factor. The quality of care offered by these practices, including their staffing levels, the range of services provided, and their patient satisfaction scores, should be evaluated. Are there any local initiatives aimed at improving primary care access? Are there programs to address health disparities within the community?

Telemedicine's role in Crenshaw mirrors its importance in 38621. The adoption of telehealth services by primary care providers can significantly improve access to care, especially for those who may face transportation challenges or other barriers. The availability of reliable internet access within the community is also a crucial factor.

The availability of mental health support within Crenshaw is also a critical consideration. The presence of mental health professionals, access to mental health services, and the integration of mental health care into primary care practices are all important factors in assessing the overall health of the community.

Comparing the two locations, the analysis will highlight the similarities and differences in healthcare access and quality. The physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources will be compared to provide a comprehensive overview of the health landscape in each area. The goal is to offer a comparative analysis, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each location.

Overall, the healthcare landscape in both 38621 and Crenshaw presents unique challenges and opportunities. Addressing these challenges requires a multifaceted approach, including efforts to increase physician recruitment, expand telemedicine services, improve mental health resources, and promote community health initiatives. The specific needs of each community should be addressed to improve the overall health and well-being of its residents.

To gain a more detailed and visually informative understanding of the healthcare landscape in these areas, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. They offer powerful visualization tools that can help you analyze and compare healthcare data, identify areas of need, and make informed decisions about healthcare planning and resource allocation.