38843, Fulton, Mississippi Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 38843, Fulton, Mississippi is 18 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 88.52 percent of the residents in 38843 has some form of health insurance. 36.27 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 63.01 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 38843 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 2,667 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 38843. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,826 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 4,157 health care providers accessible to residents in 38843, Fulton, Mississippi.

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Fulton, Mississippi (ZIP Code 38843)

This analysis provides an overall health score assessment for the residents of Fulton, Mississippi, specifically focusing on the availability and quality of primary care within the ZIP code 38843. We will examine various factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, notable medical practices, the integration of telemedicine, and the accessibility of mental health resources. This evaluation aims to paint a comprehensive picture of the healthcare landscape in Fulton, offering insights into its strengths and areas needing improvement.

The cornerstone of any healthy community is access to primary care physicians. In Fulton, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical metric. Analyzing this ratio requires data from various sources, including the U.S. Census Bureau for population figures and the Mississippi State Board of Medical Licensure for the number of practicing physicians within the designated ZIP code. A lower ratio, reflecting more physicians per capita, generally indicates better access to care. However, this ratio alone doesn't tell the whole story. Factors like the age and health status of the population, the types of medical specialties available, and the geographic distribution of physicians within the area all play a significant role.

One of the standout practices in Fulton, or the surrounding area, could be North Mississippi Medical Center – Fulton. This facility likely offers a range of services, including primary care, specialist referrals, and possibly even certain outpatient procedures. The quality of care offered by such a practice can be evaluated through various means. Patient satisfaction surveys, publicly available data on clinical outcomes (if available), and the presence of accreditations from reputable organizations all contribute to an assessment of a practice's quality. Furthermore, the availability of extended hours, weekend appointments, and same-day scheduling can significantly impact patient access and convenience.

The adoption of telemedicine is another crucial factor in evaluating healthcare accessibility. Telemedicine, the use of technology to provide healthcare remotely, can be particularly beneficial in rural areas like Fulton. It can overcome geographical barriers, allowing patients to consult with physicians without traveling long distances. Assessing telemedicine adoption involves examining the availability of virtual appointments, the types of services offered remotely (e.g., follow-up appointments, medication management, mental health counseling), and the ease of use of the technology for both patients and providers. A robust telemedicine infrastructure can significantly improve the overall health score of a community.

Beyond physical health, mental health resources are essential for overall well-being. Assessing the availability of mental health services in Fulton requires investigating the presence of psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and counselors. The availability of these professionals, coupled with the presence of mental health clinics or programs, is a key indicator. Furthermore, the accessibility of these resources, including insurance acceptance, waiting times for appointments, and the availability of crisis intervention services, must be considered. The integration of mental healthcare into primary care settings can also improve access and outcomes.

The quality of healthcare extends beyond the availability of physicians and resources. It also encompasses the broader healthcare ecosystem. This includes the presence of community health initiatives, public health programs, and partnerships between healthcare providers and local organizations. These initiatives can address social determinants of health, such as poverty, food insecurity, and lack of transportation, which can significantly impact health outcomes. The level of community engagement and the responsiveness of healthcare providers to the needs of the local population are also important considerations.

Evaluating the overall health score for Fulton, Mississippi (ZIP code 38843) requires a holistic approach. It demands a comprehensive assessment of various factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, the quality of medical practices, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, and the broader healthcare ecosystem. The final score should reflect the accessibility, quality, and responsiveness of healthcare services to the needs of the community. This analysis, however, is limited by the availability of data. More detailed information would be needed to provide a definitive numerical score.

The health score is not static; it is a dynamic measure that changes over time. Regular monitoring and evaluation are essential to track progress, identify areas for improvement, and ensure that healthcare services are meeting the evolving needs of the Fulton community. Continuous improvement requires collaboration between healthcare providers, policymakers, and community members.

Finally, the health score should be used as a tool to advocate for better healthcare resources and services. It can inform policy decisions, guide resource allocation, and empower residents to make informed choices about their health. By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system, the community can work together to create a healthier future for all.