38952, Schlater, Mississippi Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 38952, Schlater, Mississippi is 35 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 88.35 percent of the residents in 38952 has some form of health insurance. 41.26 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 51.94 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 38952 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 71 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 38952. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 108 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 347 health care providers accessible to residents in 38952, Schlater, Mississippi.

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Schlater, MS (ZIP Code 38952)

Assessing the overall health landscape within Schlater, Mississippi, and specifically within the 38952 ZIP code, requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis considers various factors, including physician availability, healthcare infrastructure, and access to essential services. The goal is to provide an informed perspective on the health resources accessible to residents and identify potential areas for improvement.

The primary challenge in evaluating healthcare in a rural area like Schlater is often the limited availability of primary care physicians. Physician-to-patient ratios are a crucial indicator. In many rural communities, the ratio is significantly higher than the national average, meaning fewer doctors are responsible for a larger population. This can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and increased strain on existing healthcare providers. Without concrete data for 38952, we must assume, based on general rural trends, that this ratio likely presents a challenge.

The presence of standout practices is another key element. These are healthcare facilities that demonstrate excellence in patient care, offer a broad range of services, and are known for their commitment to the community. Identifying these practices requires a review of patient reviews, quality metrics, and the scope of services offered. Are there any clinics that consistently receive positive feedback? Do they offer specialized services beyond basic primary care? This information is vital to understanding the quality of care available.

Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important, particularly in rural areas where geographical barriers can limit access to healthcare. Telemedicine offers a way for patients to consult with doctors remotely, reducing the need for travel and improving access to specialized care. The extent of telemedicine integration in Schlater's healthcare ecosystem is a significant factor in determining the overall health score. Do local practices offer virtual consultations? Are they utilizing telehealth for follow-up appointments or chronic disease management?

Mental health resources are also critical. Mental health services are often under-resourced in rural areas, leading to unmet needs and potential health disparities. The availability of psychiatrists, therapists, and counseling services within or near Schlater is a vital component of this assessment. Are there mental health professionals accepting new patients? Is there access to crisis intervention services? The presence and accessibility of mental health support directly impact the overall health and well-being of the community.

Furthermore, the availability of specialized care, such as cardiology, dermatology, and endocrinology, needs to be considered. Residents may have to travel significant distances to access these services, which can be a burden. The proximity of hospitals and emergency care facilities is also essential. The ability to quickly access emergency medical services is crucial for addressing acute health issues.

Analyzing the health score requires a holistic approach. It's not just about the number of doctors but also the quality of care, the availability of resources, and the overall health infrastructure. The score reflects the community's ability to provide and access essential healthcare services.

Assessing primary care availability in Schlater requires a deeper dive. We need to consider the capacity of existing primary care practices. How many patients can each physician see? Are they accepting new patients? What are the average wait times for appointments? The availability of primary care is the foundation of a healthy community. It's the first point of contact for most health concerns and plays a vital role in preventative care.

The presence of community health centers or federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) is another important consideration. These centers often provide comprehensive primary care services to underserved populations, including those with limited financial resources. If an FQHC is present, it can significantly improve the health score.

The availability of ancillary services, such as pharmacies, laboratories, and imaging centers, also contributes to the overall health score. These services are essential for diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of health conditions. The accessibility of these services impacts the convenience and efficiency of healthcare delivery.

The overall health score would be a composite metric. It would incorporate data points like physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of specialized care, telemedicine adoption rates, and the availability of mental health resources. It would also consider the quality of care, as measured by patient satisfaction surveys and clinical outcomes.

The score would be a dynamic measure. It would be updated regularly to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape. This could involve the opening or closing of practices, the adoption of new technologies, or changes in the availability of services.

The health score should be used as a tool to inform decision-making. It can help healthcare providers, policymakers, and community members understand the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system. It can also be used to identify areas for improvement and to develop strategies to address health disparities.

The specific ranking for doctors in 38952 and primary care availability in Schlater would depend on the availability of detailed data. Without access to such data, it is impossible to provide a precise score. However, the framework outlined above provides a comprehensive approach to assessing the health landscape in this rural Mississippi community.

To gain a clearer picture of the healthcare landscape in Schlater and surrounding areas, including the location of healthcare facilities, physician availability, and other relevant data, consider exploring interactive maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a visual representation of healthcare resources, allowing for a more informed understanding of access and availability.