39067, Ethel, Mississippi Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 39067, Ethel, Mississippi is 16 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 91.18 percent of the residents in 39067 has some form of health insurance. 51.70 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 54.41 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39067 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 310 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39067. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 250 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 358 health care providers accessible to residents in 39067, Ethel, Mississippi.

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Ethel, Mississippi (ZIP Code 39067)

Evaluating the overall health landscape within Ethel, Mississippi, and specifically focusing on the availability and quality of primary care physicians (PCPs) within ZIP code 39067, requires a multifaceted approach. We must consider physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. This analysis aims to provide an informed ‘Overall Health Score,’ acknowledging the inherent challenges in accurately quantifying such a complex system.

Ethel, a small community in Attala County, likely faces challenges common to rural areas regarding healthcare access. Population density is a crucial factor. A lower population density often translates to a lower concentration of healthcare providers. Determining the precise physician-to-patient ratio requires accessing up-to-date data from sources like the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) or state medical boards. However, we can anticipate a potential shortage of PCPs compared to more urbanized areas. A low ratio would negatively impact the ‘Overall Health Score,’ as it directly affects access to timely and preventative care. Patients may face longer wait times for appointments, increased travel distances, and potentially delayed diagnoses.

Identifying “standout practices” requires a deeper dive into the specific healthcare providers operating within the ZIP code and its immediate vicinity. This involves researching factors such as patient reviews, the range of services offered, the qualifications and experience of the physicians, and the practice's commitment to patient-centered care. Practices that offer extended hours, accept a wide variety of insurance plans, and have a strong reputation for patient satisfaction would contribute positively to the ‘Overall Health Score.’ Conversely, practices with negative reviews, limited services, or a history of access challenges would detract from the score. The presence of a federally qualified health center (FQHC) in the area would be a significant positive, as these centers are designed to serve underserved populations and often provide a comprehensive range of services.

Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor. The ability to access healthcare remotely can be a game-changer, especially in rural areas where travel distances can be a significant barrier. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient portals, would contribute positively to the ‘Overall Health Score.’ Telemedicine can improve access to care, reduce travel burdens, and potentially lower healthcare costs. However, the success of telemedicine hinges on factors such as reliable internet access, patient digital literacy, and the availability of necessary technology. The extent of telemedicine adoption within Ethel is a key indicator of the community's ability to leverage technology to improve healthcare access.

Mental health resources are a crucial component of overall health. The availability of mental health services, including psychiatrists, therapists, and counselors, is a significant factor in the ‘Overall Health Score.’ Rural areas often face shortages of mental health providers, which can lead to delayed treatment, increased rates of mental illness, and potentially higher rates of suicide. Assessing the availability of mental health resources requires researching the presence of mental health clinics, the availability of licensed therapists, and the accessibility of crisis intervention services. The integration of mental health services within primary care practices would be a significant positive, as it can improve access to mental health care and reduce the stigma associated with seeking help. The presence of support groups and community mental health programs would also contribute positively to the score.

The ‘Overall Health Score’ for Ethel, Mississippi, would be a composite score, reflecting the weighted average of these factors. A higher physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of high-quality practices, the widespread adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of robust mental health resources would all contribute to a higher score. Conversely, a low physician-to-patient ratio, limited access to quality practices, a lack of telemedicine adoption, and a scarcity of mental health resources would lead to a lower score. The score would be a snapshot in time, subject to change as healthcare providers come and go, as technology evolves, and as community needs shift.

It is important to acknowledge the limitations of this analysis. Obtaining precise data on physician-to-patient ratios, practice quality, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resource availability requires access to comprehensive and up-to-date information. Publicly available data may not always reflect the complete picture, and anecdotal evidence can be unreliable. A thorough assessment would involve direct engagement with healthcare providers, community stakeholders, and patients.

Furthermore, the ‘Overall Health Score’ is not a definitive measure of the health of the community. It is a reflection of the healthcare infrastructure and the availability of resources. Other factors, such as socioeconomic status, education levels, access to healthy food, and environmental factors, also play a significant role in overall health outcomes. The ‘Overall Health Score’ should be viewed as one piece of a larger puzzle, providing a valuable perspective on the healthcare landscape within Ethel, Mississippi.

In conclusion, a comprehensive analysis of the healthcare landscape in Ethel, Mississippi, reveals the need for careful evaluation of various factors. Understanding physician-to-patient ratios, assessing the quality of available practices, examining the extent of telemedicine adoption, and evaluating the availability of mental health resources are all critical to determining the community's overall health. This analysis serves as a starting point for a more in-depth investigation, highlighting the need for continuous monitoring and improvement of healthcare access and quality in rural communities.

Are you looking for an interactive map to visualize the healthcare landscape of Ethel, Mississippi, and other areas? Explore the power of location intelligence with CartoChrome maps. Gain insights into physician locations, patient demographics, and healthcare access patterns.