The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 39071, Flora, Mississippi is 100 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 87.28 percent of the residents in 39071 has some form of health insurance. 35.90 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 59.32 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39071 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,923 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 12 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39071. An estimate of 5 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 812 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,214 health care providers accessible to residents in 39071, Flora, Mississippi.
Health Scores in 39071, Flora, Mississippi
Overall Health Score | 86 |
---|---|
People Score | 69 |
Provider Score | 100 |
Hospital Score | 37 |
Travel Score | 44 |
39071 | Flora | Mississippi | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 4,488.71 | 10,681.72 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 17,291.43 | 41,205.71 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 36,022.17 | 87,192.12 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Flora, Mississippi (ZIP Code 39071)
Assessing the overall health landscape within Flora, Mississippi (ZIP Code 39071) requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis will delve into the availability of primary care physicians, physician-to-patient ratios, the presence and quality of standout medical practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the accessibility of mental health resources. This comprehensive evaluation aims to provide an 'Overall Health Score' for the community, offering insights into its strengths and weaknesses.
The foundation of a healthy community lies in the accessibility of primary care. In Flora, understanding the physician-to-patient ratio is crucial. A low ratio, indicating a scarcity of physicians relative to the population, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced preventative care, and potentially, poorer health outcomes. Conversely, a high ratio suggests better access to care. Precise figures for this ratio are essential for a truly informed assessment. Publicly available data from sources like the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) or state health departments would provide the most accurate information.
Beyond the raw numbers, the distribution of primary care physicians within the ZIP code is equally important. Are physicians concentrated in a single location, or are they spread out to serve different areas of the community? This distribution impacts access, particularly for residents with limited mobility or transportation challenges. The presence of federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) or rural health clinics (RHCs) can significantly improve access for underserved populations. These clinics often offer sliding-scale fees and a wider range of services, making healthcare more accessible to those with lower incomes.
Identifying standout medical practices within Flora is key to understanding the quality of care available. This involves evaluating factors like patient satisfaction, the range of services offered, and the use of technology. Practices with a strong reputation for patient-centered care, comprehensive services (including preventative care, chronic disease management, and specialist referrals), and the adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) are likely to contribute positively to the community's overall health. Reviews from patients, data on patient outcomes (where available), and accreditation status (e.g., from the Joint Commission) can provide valuable insights into practice quality.
Telemedicine has emerged as a vital tool for expanding healthcare access, especially in rural areas like Flora. Its adoption rate among local physicians is a significant factor in the overall health score. Telemedicine can facilitate virtual consultations, remote monitoring of chronic conditions, and access to specialists who may not be readily available locally. Practices actively utilizing telemedicine platforms, offering virtual appointments, and integrating telehealth into their care models are likely to enhance the community's access to care. The availability of reliable internet access within the community is a crucial supporting factor for the successful implementation of telemedicine.
Mental health resources are a critical component of overall well-being, and their availability significantly impacts the health score. Assessing the presence of mental health providers (psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and counselors) within Flora and the surrounding area is essential. The ratio of mental health providers to the population is another key indicator. Beyond the number of providers, the types of services offered (individual therapy, group therapy, medication management), the acceptance of insurance, and the availability of crisis intervention services are all important considerations. Collaboration between primary care physicians and mental health providers can improve the integration of mental healthcare into the overall health system. The presence of community mental health centers or partnerships with local hospitals can also enhance access to mental health services.
Evaluating the health score requires a holistic approach, considering all the factors discussed above. The physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of medical practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources all contribute to the final score. A community with a high physician-to-patient ratio, well-regarded medical practices, widespread telemedicine adoption, and readily available mental health services would likely receive a higher score than one with limited resources in these areas. The score should be viewed as a dynamic measure, reflecting the ongoing evolution of healthcare within the community.
The overall health score is not just a number; it's a reflection of the community's health infrastructure. It provides a snapshot of the current state of healthcare access, quality, and resources. This information can be used to identify areas for improvement, guide resource allocation, and advocate for policies that support a healthier community. Regularly updating the score, incorporating new data, and tracking changes over time is crucial for monitoring progress and ensuring that healthcare services meet the evolving needs of the residents of Flora.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like