39150, Port Gibson, Mississippi Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 39150, Port Gibson, Mississippi is 28 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 82.68 percent of the residents in 39150 has some form of health insurance. 47.22 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 45.34 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39150 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,540 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39150. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 943 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 48 health care providers accessible to residents in 39150, Port Gibson, Mississippi.

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Port Gibson, MS (ZIP Code 39150)

Evaluating the overall health landscape within Port Gibson, Mississippi (ZIP code 39150) necessitates a multifaceted approach, considering not only the availability of physicians but also the broader context of healthcare access, resource allocation, and patient outcomes. This analysis will attempt to provide an ‘Overall Health Score’ assessment, focusing on key indicators and specific factors influencing the health of the community.

One of the most critical metrics is the physician-to-patient ratio. This ratio, reflecting the number of physicians per 1,000 residents, is a fundamental indicator of healthcare accessibility. In areas with a low physician-to-patient ratio, residents may face significant challenges in securing timely appointments, leading to delayed diagnoses and treatments. Data analysis, including publicly available sources and potentially local health department reports, is crucial for determining the specific ratio in Port Gibson. A low ratio would significantly detract from the overall health score.

Beyond the raw numbers, the specialty mix of available physicians is also important. A robust primary care infrastructure is the foundation of a healthy community. The presence of general practitioners, internal medicine specialists, and family medicine physicians is essential for providing preventative care, managing chronic conditions, and coordinating specialist referrals. The absence of these core specialties would negatively impact the health score. The availability of specialists, such as cardiologists, endocrinologists, and neurologists, further enhances the quality of care, though their absence may be less critical than a lack of primary care.

Identifying standout practices within the ZIP code is another vital component of the assessment. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care, utilize innovative technologies, and achieve positive health outcomes should be highlighted. Factors to consider include patient satisfaction scores, the adoption of electronic health records (EHRs), and the implementation of evidence-based clinical guidelines. The presence of a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) or a rural health clinic would be a significant positive factor, indicating a commitment to serving underserved populations.

Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important, particularly in rural areas like Port Gibson. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, improving access to specialists and providing convenient access to primary care. The availability of telehealth services, including virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient portals, can significantly enhance the overall health score. Practices that actively embrace telemedicine demonstrate a commitment to improving patient access and convenience.

Mental health resources are a critical, often overlooked, component of overall health. The availability of mental health professionals, including psychiatrists, psychologists, and licensed clinical social workers, is crucial for addressing mental health concerns. The presence of mental health clinics, support groups, and access to crisis intervention services would positively impact the health score. The integration of mental health services into primary care settings is another positive indicator, facilitating early detection and treatment of mental health conditions. The absence of these resources would significantly diminish the overall health score.

The socioeconomic factors of Port Gibson must also be considered. Poverty, lack of education, and limited access to healthy food options can significantly impact health outcomes. These factors are not directly related to the availability of physicians, but they influence the overall health of the community and must be considered when evaluating the health score. The presence of community health programs, such as food banks, nutrition education initiatives, and programs addressing social determinants of health, can mitigate these challenges and positively impact the health score.

Specific examples of practices and resources are essential to this analysis. If a particular practice, for instance, consistently receives high patient satisfaction ratings and actively utilizes telehealth services, it would be highlighted as a standout practice. Similarly, the presence of a local mental health clinic offering a range of services would be a positive factor. The absence of such resources, or the presence of significant wait times for appointments, would negatively impact the score.

The overall health score is not a single number but a composite assessment based on the factors discussed. The physician-to-patient ratio, the availability of primary care and specialists, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, and the socioeconomic factors of the community all contribute to the final assessment. A low score would indicate significant challenges in healthcare access and quality, while a high score would reflect a more robust and accessible healthcare system.

The evaluation should also consider the quality of the available healthcare facilities. Are the hospitals and clinics well-equipped and staffed? Do they have a good reputation for patient care? Are they accredited by recognized healthcare organizations? These factors contribute to the overall quality of care and should be factored into the health score.

The analysis would also look at public health initiatives. Does the local health department offer programs such as vaccinations, health screenings, and health education campaigns? These initiatives can improve the health of the community and should be considered when evaluating the health score.

The ultimate goal is to provide a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the healthcare landscape in Port Gibson. The overall health score should reflect the strengths and weaknesses of the system, providing valuable insights for policymakers, healthcare providers, and community members. This analysis should be regularly updated to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape.

To further enhance your understanding of the healthcare landscape in Port Gibson and visualize the data discussed, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a visual representation of physician locations, healthcare facility locations, and other relevant data, allowing you to explore the health landscape in a more intuitive and interactive way. Explore the possibilities with CartoChrome maps to gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare resources available in Port Gibson.