39175, Utica, Mississippi Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 39175, Utica, Mississippi is 17 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 86.45 percent of the residents in 39175 has some form of health insurance. 48.17 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 53.47 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39175 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 582 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39175. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 938 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 158 health care providers accessible to residents in 39175, Utica, Mississippi.

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Utica, Mississippi (ZIP Code 39175)

Analyzing the overall health landscape in Utica, Mississippi (ZIP code 39175) requires a multi-faceted approach, considering not only the number of physicians but also the accessibility of care, the integration of technology, and the availability of crucial support services like mental healthcare. This analysis aims to provide an “Overall Health Score” assessment, considering these factors to paint a comprehensive picture of the community's health resources.

The foundation of any health assessment lies in the availability of primary care physicians. In Utica, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator. A low ratio, meaning a smaller number of doctors serving a larger population, can lead to longer wait times, reduced access to preventative care, and ultimately, poorer health outcomes. Determining the precise ratio requires accessing current data on physician counts and population demographics within the ZIP code. Public health agencies and local medical societies are typically the best sources for this information. Without this specific data, any definitive score is speculative.

Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of primary care practices is essential. Are there any standout practices in Utica? This involves assessing factors like patient satisfaction, the range of services offered (e.g., chronic disease management, women's health, pediatric care), and the credentials of the physicians. Reviews from patients, accreditation status from organizations like the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA), and the presence of specialized certifications can all indicate a higher level of care. Identifying and highlighting these practices is crucial for residents seeking quality healthcare.

The adoption of telemedicine is another vital aspect of the health score. Telemedicine, encompassing remote consultations, virtual monitoring, and online patient portals, can significantly improve access to care, especially in rural areas where geographic barriers are significant. Assessing the level of telemedicine integration in Utica involves determining which practices offer virtual appointments, how readily patients can access their medical records online, and the availability of remote monitoring tools for managing chronic conditions. A higher adoption rate of telemedicine contributes positively to the overall health score.

Mental health resources are a critical component of overall well-being. Utica's health score must consider the availability of mental health professionals, including psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and counselors. Assessing the presence of these resources involves identifying local mental health clinics, counseling services, and the availability of support groups. Furthermore, the integration of mental health services within primary care practices is a positive indicator, as it facilitates early detection and treatment of mental health conditions. The presence of these services, and their accessibility, directly impacts the overall health score.

Accessibility of care extends beyond the presence of doctors and mental health professionals. Transportation options, especially for those without personal vehicles, play a crucial role. Are there public transportation options, or are there community-based programs that offer transportation assistance to medical appointments? The availability of affordable prescription medications is another factor. Access to pharmacies and programs that help patients afford their medications directly influences their ability to adhere to treatment plans and maintain their health.

The overall health score is not a static number; it's a dynamic reflection of the community's health resources and their accessibility. It is a complex metric, influenced by various factors, each contributing to the overall well-being of the residents. The score can range from poor to excellent, with each level defined by specific criteria. A poor score might indicate a severe shortage of physicians, limited access to mental health services, and little to no telemedicine adoption. An excellent score, on the other hand, would reflect a robust network of primary care physicians, readily available mental health services, widespread telemedicine adoption, and strong community support systems.

To determine the overall health score for Utica, a weighted scoring system should be employed. Each factor, such as physician-to-patient ratio, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources, would be assigned a weight based on its relative importance. The score for each factor would then be determined based on specific criteria. For example, a low physician-to-patient ratio would receive a higher score than a high ratio. The weighted scores for each factor would then be combined to arrive at the overall health score.

In conclusion, assessing the overall health score for Utica, Mississippi (ZIP code 39175) is a multi-faceted endeavor. It requires a comprehensive evaluation of physician availability, the quality of care, the integration of technology, the availability of mental health resources, and the accessibility of care. This analysis highlights the need for detailed data collection and a nuanced understanding of the community's healthcare landscape. The final score should provide a clear picture of the community's health resources and identify areas for improvement.

For a visual representation of the health landscape in Utica and surrounding areas, including physician locations, healthcare facility locations, and demographic data, consider exploring the interactive mapping capabilities offered by CartoChrome maps.