The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 39203, Jackson, Mississippi is 94 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 78.15 percent of the residents in 39203 has some form of health insurance. 47.34 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 35.89 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 39203 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 923 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 79 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 39203. An estimate of 44 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 609 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 10,908 health care providers accessible to residents in 39203, Jackson, Mississippi.
Health Scores in 39203, Jackson, Mississippi
Overall Health Score | 60 |
---|---|
People Score | 8 |
Provider Score | 94 |
Hospital Score | 38 |
Travel Score | 66 |
39203 | Jackson | Mississippi | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 6,369.39 | 472.14 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 35,810.06 | 1,907.73 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 50,113.09 | 3,488.16 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Jackson, Mississippi (ZIP Code 39203)
Analyzing the overall health landscape within ZIP Code 39203 in Jackson, Mississippi, requires a multi-faceted approach. It necessitates examining the availability of primary care physicians, their patient loads, the integration of technology like telemedicine, and the accessibility of mental health services. This analysis will culminate in an “Overall Health Score” assessment, reflecting the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare ecosystem in this specific area.
The cornerstone of any healthy community is access to primary care. In 39203, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical metric. A high ratio, meaning fewer doctors for a larger population, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and ultimately, poorer health outcomes. Data on this ratio needs to be meticulously gathered from various sources, including state medical boards, insurance providers, and local healthcare networks. This data will allow us to understand the current demand for primary care services and identify any potential shortages.
Beyond sheer numbers, the quality of primary care is paramount. This involves evaluating the practices themselves. Are they accepting new patients? Do they offer a range of services, including preventative care, chronic disease management, and specialist referrals? Are they equipped with modern technology, such as electronic health records (EHRs), to streamline patient care? Some practices may stand out for their commitment to patient-centered care, their use of innovative treatment approaches, or their dedication to community outreach. These practices would contribute positively to the overall health score.
Telemedicine has emerged as a transformative force in healthcare, particularly in areas with limited access to care. The adoption rate of telemedicine within 39203 is an important indicator. Does the area's primary care network embrace virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient portals? Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, improve access for patients with mobility issues, and provide convenient follow-up care. The extent of telemedicine integration directly impacts the overall health score, as it can improve access and convenience.
Mental health is an integral component of overall well-being. Assessing the availability of mental health resources in 39203 is crucial. This includes the presence of psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and counselors. Are there adequate mental health facilities, such as outpatient clinics and inpatient units? Are mental health services covered by insurance plans accepted by local providers? The prevalence of mental health challenges and the availability of support services directly impact the overall health score. Limited access to mental health care can significantly detract from the overall health of the community.
Furthermore, consider the demographic makeup of 39203. The population's age, socioeconomic status, and racial composition influence health needs and access to care. For example, a large elderly population may require more geriatric care, while a population with a high prevalence of chronic diseases may necessitate specialized disease management programs. Understanding these demographics helps tailor the health score analysis to the specific needs of the community.
The overall health score isn't a static number; it's a dynamic assessment that reflects the evolving healthcare landscape. It’s a composite of various factors, each weighted based on its impact on the community's health. The physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of primary care practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources are all crucial elements. A high score would indicate a robust healthcare system with ample access to quality care, while a low score would highlight areas needing improvement.
To calculate the score, each factor must be quantified and assigned a numerical value. For example, the physician-to-patient ratio could be graded based on a scale, with a lower ratio (more doctors per patient) receiving a higher score. The quality of primary care practices could be assessed based on patient satisfaction surveys, accreditation status, and the range of services offered. Telemedicine adoption could be measured by the percentage of practices offering virtual consultations and the frequency of their use. Mental health resource availability could be gauged by the number of mental health professionals per capita and the accessibility of mental health services.
The final overall health score would be a weighted average of these individual scores. The weighting of each factor should reflect its relative importance. For instance, access to primary care might be weighted more heavily than telemedicine adoption, as it's the foundation of a healthy community. This final score would provide a comprehensive overview of the health landscape in 39203.
The analysis would also need to identify any health disparities within the community. Are certain populations, such as low-income residents or minority groups, facing greater challenges in accessing care? Addressing these disparities is essential for improving the overall health of the community. This requires a detailed understanding of the social determinants of health, such as housing, education, and employment.
The overall health score analysis is not just a static assessment; it's a tool for improvement. It can be used to identify areas where resources are lacking, inform policy decisions, and guide healthcare providers in their efforts to improve patient care. Regular reassessment of the score would allow for tracking progress and adapting strategies to meet the evolving needs of the community.
Ultimately, a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape in 39203 requires visualizing the data. Geographic information systems (GIS) can be used to map the distribution of healthcare providers, identify areas with limited access to care, and visualize the relationships between various health indicators. This spatial analysis can reveal patterns and trends that might not be apparent from raw data alone.
Ready to dive deeper into the health landscape of Jackson, Mississippi, and beyond? Explore the power of spatial data visualization with CartoChrome maps. Understand the intricacies of healthcare access, resource allocation, and population health trends with interactive and insightful maps.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like