The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 27315, Providence, North Carolina is 27 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 94.00 percent of the residents in 27315 has some form of health insurance. 39.35 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 70.53 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 27315 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 433 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 27315. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 542 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 535 health care providers accessible to residents in 27315, Providence, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 27315, Providence, North Carolina
Overall Health Score | 18 |
---|---|
People Score | 27 |
Provider Score | 27 |
Hospital Score | 32 |
Travel Score | 54 |
27315 | Providence | North Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 1,465.75 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 6,494.12 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 5,055.35 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 27315 vs. Primary Care Availability in Providence
This analysis provides an overall health score assessment, comparing the healthcare landscape within ZIP Code 27315 (a hypothetical ZIP code) and the primary care availability in Providence, Rhode Island. The evaluation considers various factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, notable practices, telemedicine integration, and mental health resources. This comparative approach aims to highlight strengths, weaknesses, and areas for potential improvement in each location.
**ZIP Code 27315: A Microcosm of Healthcare Access**
Analyzing a specific ZIP code, such as 27315, allows for a granular examination of healthcare access. The physician-to-patient ratio is a crucial starting point. A high ratio, indicating fewer physicians per resident, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potential strain on existing healthcare providers. Data collection would involve accessing publicly available resources and potentially utilizing data from local healthcare networks. The analysis would need to consider not only the number of primary care physicians but also the availability of specialists, such as cardiologists, dermatologists, and endocrinologists, as these specialists are often a crucial part of a patient’s overall healthcare experience.
Standout practices within 27315 could be identified through patient reviews, community surveys, and data from healthcare rating websites. These practices might excel in specific areas, such as patient satisfaction, specialized services, or innovative care models. A practice with a strong reputation for patient-centered care, efficient appointment scheduling, and a commitment to preventative medicine would likely receive a higher score. The presence of a practice affiliated with a major hospital system or a research institution could also contribute positively to the overall health score.
Telemedicine adoption is another key factor. The ability to offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient portals can significantly improve access to care, particularly for individuals with mobility issues, those living in rural areas, or those with busy schedules. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering a range of virtual services, would likely score higher than those with limited or no telemedicine capabilities. This includes evaluating the ease of use of the telemedicine platform, the availability of technical support for patients, and the integration of telemedicine with the practice's existing electronic health records system.
Mental health resources are essential for overall well-being. The analysis would assess the availability of psychiatrists, therapists, and counselors within the ZIP code. The presence of mental health clinics, community mental health centers, and partnerships with local hospitals would be considered. The availability of mental health services that accept various insurance plans and offer sliding-scale fees is also a critical factor, ensuring that mental healthcare is accessible to all residents, regardless of their financial situation.
**Providence: A Broader Perspective on Primary Care**
Evaluating primary care availability in Providence, Rhode Island, requires a broader perspective. The physician-to-patient ratio for the entire city would be analyzed, comparing it to state and national averages. This comparison provides a benchmark for assessing the adequacy of primary care resources within Providence. Data collection would involve accessing data from the Rhode Island Department of Health, the American Medical Association, and other relevant sources.
The analysis would identify key primary care practices and healthcare systems in Providence. This includes evaluating the size and scope of these practices, the range of services offered, and their geographic distribution throughout the city. The presence of federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), which provide comprehensive primary care services to underserved populations, would be a positive indicator. The analysis would also consider the availability of after-hours care, urgent care clinics, and walk-in services, which can improve access to care outside of regular business hours.
Telemedicine adoption in Providence would be evaluated at a city-wide level. The analysis would assess the extent to which primary care practices and healthcare systems have integrated telemedicine into their services. This includes evaluating the types of virtual services offered, the ease of access to these services, and the integration of telemedicine with existing healthcare infrastructure. The analysis would also consider the availability of telemedicine services for specific populations, such as the elderly, those with chronic conditions, and those with limited transportation options.
Mental health resources in Providence would be assessed at a city-wide level. The analysis would evaluate the availability of psychiatrists, therapists, and counselors, as well as the presence of mental health clinics, community mental health centers, and hospital-based mental health services. The analysis would also consider the availability of mental health services that accept various insurance plans and offer sliding-scale fees, ensuring that mental healthcare is accessible to all residents. The presence of specialized mental health services, such as addiction treatment centers and programs for children and adolescents, would also be considered.
**Comparative Analysis and Overall Health Score**
Comparing the two locations requires a standardized scoring system. Each factor (physician-to-patient ratio, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources) would be assigned a weighted score based on its relative importance. The overall health score for each location would be calculated by summing the weighted scores for each factor.
The analysis would then compare the overall health scores for ZIP Code 27315 and Providence. This comparison would highlight the strengths and weaknesses of each location, providing insights into areas where healthcare access and quality could be improved. For example, if ZIP Code 27315 has a lower physician-to-patient ratio but Providence has better mental health resources, the analysis would reveal these nuances.
**Conclusion**
This comprehensive analysis provides a framework for assessing the overall health landscape in specific geographic areas. By considering various factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources, it offers valuable insights into healthcare access and quality. The comparative approach allows for a nuanced understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of each location, informing efforts to improve healthcare outcomes.
For a visual representation of these healthcare landscapes, including detailed maps of physician locations, healthcare facility distribution, and other relevant data, we invite you to explore CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome offers interactive mapping tools that can provide a deeper understanding of the healthcare environment in your area.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like