The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 27455, Greensboro, North Carolina is 49 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 95.72 percent of the residents in 27455 has some form of health insurance. 23.59 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 80.91 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 27455 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 6,709 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 3 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 27455. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 4,745 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 4,827 health care providers accessible to residents in 27455, Greensboro, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 27455, Greensboro, North Carolina
Overall Health Score | 50 |
---|---|
People Score | 51 |
Provider Score | 49 |
Hospital Score | 33 |
Travel Score | 60 |
27455 | Greensboro | North Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 997.97 | 1,022.79 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 4,430.24 | 4,637.57 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 5,794.12 | 6,937.45 | 0.00 |
The evaluation of overall health within ZIP Code 27455, encompassing Greensboro, North Carolina, requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis, focusing on the availability and quality of primary care physicians, delves into physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the integration of telemedicine, and the accessibility of mental health resources. The goal is to provide a comprehensive 'Overall Health Score' assessment, offering insights into the healthcare landscape and identifying areas of strength and potential improvement.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical indicator of healthcare accessibility. A higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potentially poorer health outcomes. Data from reputable sources such as the North Carolina Medical Board and the US Census Bureau must be analyzed to determine the specific physician-to-patient ratio within 27455. This data should be compared to both the national average and the state average to gauge the relative availability of primary care physicians. A significantly lower ratio compared to the averages would suggest potential challenges in accessing timely and appropriate medical care.
Standout practices, those known for their commitment to quality care, patient satisfaction, and innovative approaches, can significantly influence the overall health score. Identifying these practices requires a review of several factors. Patient reviews on platforms such as Healthgrades, Vitals, and Google Reviews offer valuable insights into patient experiences, including wait times, communication with physicians, and the overall quality of care. Accreditations from organizations like the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) and the Joint Commission indicate adherence to high standards of care. Furthermore, examining the adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) and other technologies can provide a glimpse into the efficiency and modernization of these practices. Practices that consistently receive positive reviews, hold relevant accreditations, and demonstrate a commitment to technological advancements are likely to contribute positively to the overall health score.
Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly important, particularly in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. The availability of telehealth services can improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas, those with mobility limitations, or those seeking convenient access to care. Assessing telemedicine adoption involves determining which primary care practices in 27455 offer telehealth consultations, remote monitoring services, and virtual follow-up appointments. The extent to which these services are integrated into the practices' workflows, and the ease with which patients can access them, should be considered. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering a range of virtual care options, will likely contribute positively to the overall health score.
Mental health resources are a crucial component of overall health. The availability of mental health services, including therapy, counseling, and psychiatric care, significantly impacts the well-being of the community. Evaluating mental health resources involves identifying the presence of mental health providers within 27455, including psychiatrists, psychologists, licensed clinical social workers, and licensed professional counselors. Assessing the accessibility of these services, including insurance acceptance, wait times for appointments, and the availability of crisis intervention services, is critical. The integration of mental health services within primary care practices, such as the availability of on-site therapists or referral pathways to mental health specialists, is also a positive indicator. A robust network of accessible mental health resources will contribute significantly to a higher overall health score.
The assessment of the overall health score requires a synthesis of all the factors mentioned above. The physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources must be considered in conjunction. A higher physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of several highly-rated practices, widespread telemedicine adoption, and a strong network of accessible mental health resources would indicate a higher overall health score. Conversely, a lower physician-to-patient ratio, limited access to quality practices, minimal telemedicine adoption, and a scarcity of mental health resources would suggest a lower score. The specific weighting of each factor should be determined based on its relative importance to the overall health of the community.
Further investigation would include a review of health outcomes data for the area, such as rates of chronic diseases, mortality rates, and preventative care utilization. Data from sources like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (NCDHHS) would be invaluable in this regard. This data can be used to validate the findings of the analysis and provide a more comprehensive picture of the health status of the community.
The overall health score is not a static measure. It should be regularly updated to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape. As new practices open, telemedicine adoption increases, and mental health resources expand, the overall health score will evolve. Regular monitoring and evaluation are essential to identify areas of improvement and ensure that the community has access to the healthcare it needs.
The evaluation of primary care availability in Greensboro, specifically within the 27455 ZIP code, reveals a complex picture. While the presence of quality practices and the adoption of telemedicine are encouraging, the physician-to-patient ratio and the accessibility of mental health resources may present challenges. A comprehensive assessment, incorporating data from multiple sources and considering all the factors discussed, is crucial to accurately determine the overall health score.
To gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Greensboro and visualize the distribution of healthcare resources, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps provide a visual representation of healthcare data, allowing you to identify areas with high and low access to care, track the location of physicians and healthcare facilities, and analyze demographic data in relation to healthcare availability.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like