The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 27834, Greenville, North Carolina is 90 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 87.66 percent of the residents in 27834 has some form of health insurance. 38.45 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 57.35 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 27834 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 14,149 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 109 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 27834. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 6,594 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 4,835 health care providers accessible to residents in 27834, Greenville, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 27834, Greenville, North Carolina
Overall Health Score | 14 |
---|---|
People Score | 3 |
Provider Score | 90 |
Hospital Score | 11 |
Travel Score | 27 |
27834 | Greenville | North Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 266.90 | 2,024.77 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 1,092.34 | 10,009.76 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 2,097.67 | 17,637.10 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Greenville, NC (ZIP Code 27834)
Evaluating the overall health landscape within Greenville, North Carolina, specifically focusing on ZIP code 27834, requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis considers physician availability, the accessibility of primary care, the integration of telemedicine, and the presence of mental health resources. We will synthesize these factors to arrive at an ‘Overall Health Score’ for this area.
The physician-to-patient ratio is a crucial indicator of healthcare accessibility. A higher ratio, reflecting fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and ultimately, poorer health outcomes. Determining the precise physician-to-patient ratio for 27834 necessitates accessing data from sources like the North Carolina Medical Board and the US Census Bureau. However, preliminary research suggests that Greenville, as a regional hub, likely enjoys a more favorable ratio than some surrounding rural areas. The presence of Vidant Medical Center, a major regional hospital, contributes significantly to the availability of specialists and primary care physicians. This concentration of medical professionals, while beneficial, doesn't necessarily guarantee equal access for all residents within the ZIP code.
Primary care availability is another critical element. This involves examining the number of family medicine, internal medicine, and pediatric practices within the area. Assessing the acceptance of new patients by these practices is also essential. A shortage of primary care physicians can force patients to seek care in emergency rooms, leading to higher healthcare costs and potentially poorer health management. The density of primary care practices within 27834, compared to the population distribution, is a key factor in determining the ‘Overall Health Score’. Are practices clustered in certain areas, potentially leaving others underserved? This spatial analysis is crucial.
Identifying standout practices is important. These are medical facilities that demonstrate excellence in patient care, innovative practices, and a commitment to community health. This evaluation considers factors like patient satisfaction scores, the implementation of advanced technologies, and the range of services offered. Practices that embrace a patient-centered approach, incorporating elements like extended hours, online appointment scheduling, and proactive communication, often receive higher ratings. Identifying these practices provides insights into best practices that could be emulated by others in the region.
Telemedicine adoption is becoming increasingly important. Telemedicine offers the potential to improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas or those with mobility issues. Assessing the prevalence of telemedicine services within 27834 involves determining which practices offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and other telehealth options. The ease of access to these services, including the availability of necessary technology and insurance coverage, is a key consideration. A high rate of telemedicine adoption can significantly boost the ‘Overall Health Score’ by increasing access to care and improving patient convenience.
Mental health resources are a critical component of overall health. The availability of psychiatrists, therapists, and mental health clinics within 27834 directly impacts the well-being of residents. Evaluating the number of mental health providers, the types of services offered (e.g., individual therapy, group therapy, medication management), and the wait times for appointments is essential. The integration of mental health services into primary care practices, a model that promotes early detection and treatment, is also a positive indicator. The presence of support groups, crisis intervention services, and community outreach programs further enhances the mental health landscape.
Synthesizing all these factors – physician-to-patient ratios, primary care availability, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources – allows for a comprehensive ‘Overall Health Score’ assessment. A higher score indicates greater access to care, a more robust healthcare infrastructure, and a stronger commitment to patient well-being. A lower score would highlight areas needing improvement, such as physician shortages, limited access to mental health services, or a lack of telemedicine options. The final score would be a composite, reflecting the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system within 27834.
The ‘Overall Health Score’ is not a static number. It's a dynamic measure that needs to be continuously monitored and updated. Changes in physician availability, the adoption of new technologies, and the evolving needs of the community can all impact the score. Regular assessments are crucial for identifying areas needing attention and for tracking progress over time.
The analysis also needs to consider the social determinants of health. These factors, such as socioeconomic status, education levels, and access to healthy food, can significantly influence health outcomes. A comprehensive ‘Overall Health Score’ should acknowledge and account for these factors, recognizing that healthcare is just one piece of the puzzle.
Furthermore, the ‘Overall Health Score’ should be used to inform decision-making. Healthcare providers, policymakers, and community organizations can use the score to prioritize resource allocation, develop targeted interventions, and improve the overall health of the population. The score can also be used to educate residents about available healthcare resources and to empower them to make informed decisions about their health.
Finally, the accuracy of the ‘Overall Health Score’ depends on the quality and availability of data. Accessing reliable data from various sources, including government agencies, healthcare providers, and community organizations, is essential. The use of data visualization tools, such as maps, can help to identify spatial patterns and to highlight areas of need.
For a deeper dive into the spatial distribution of healthcare resources and a visual representation of the factors influencing the ‘Overall Health Score’ in Greenville, NC (ZIP Code 27834), consider exploring the advanced mapping capabilities offered by CartoChrome.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like