28393, Turkey, North Carolina Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 28393, Turkey, North Carolina is 23 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 87.70 percent of the residents in 28393 has some form of health insurance. 52.96 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 49.06 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28393 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 431 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 9 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28393. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 556 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,056 health care providers accessible to residents in 28393, Turkey, North Carolina.

## Overall Health Score Analysis: 28393 vs. Turkey

This analysis presents a comparative overview of healthcare landscapes, focusing on two distinct contexts: the availability and quality of primary care within the ZIP code 28393 (likely a US location) and the broader healthcare system in Turkey. The aim is to provide an “Overall Health Score” perspective, considering factors like physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources. Due to the inherent differences in data availability and the scope of the two areas, a direct numerical score comparison is not feasible. Instead, a qualitative assessment, highlighting strengths and weaknesses, will be offered.

**ZIP Code 28393 (Hypothetical US Location)**

Evaluating healthcare within a specific ZIP code requires granular data, which is often difficult to obtain publicly. However, we can infer certain aspects based on general trends and available information. Physician-to-patient ratios are a crucial indicator. A higher ratio of patients per physician suggests potential access challenges, longer wait times, and potentially, less individualized care. Local data, such as that available from state medical boards or local health departments, would be necessary to determine the specific ratio for 28393. Furthermore, the distribution of primary care physicians (PCPs) within the ZIP code is critical. Are they clustered in specific areas, leaving others underserved?

Identifying "standout practices" necessitates examining factors like patient satisfaction scores, the adoption of innovative technologies, and the range of services offered. Practices that embrace electronic health records (EHRs), patient portals, and preventative care programs often demonstrate a commitment to quality and patient-centered care. Reviews on platforms like Healthgrades or Zocdoc, while not always definitive, can offer insights into patient experiences. The presence of practices affiliated with larger hospital systems might indicate access to a broader network of specialists and resources.

Telemedicine adoption is another key area. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the use of telehealth, and its continued integration is a sign of a forward-thinking healthcare environment. Practices offering virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online appointment scheduling are likely to provide greater convenience and accessibility, particularly for patients with mobility limitations or those residing in geographically isolated areas. The availability of telehealth services also contributes to a more robust mental health support system.

Mental health resources are a critical component of overall health. Assessing the availability of mental health professionals (psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists) within 28393 is essential. Are there sufficient resources to meet the community's needs? The presence of mental health clinics, support groups, and partnerships with local schools and community organizations indicates a more comprehensive approach to mental wellbeing. The integration of mental health services into primary care practices is also a positive indicator, facilitating early detection and treatment.

**Primary Care Availability in Turkey**

Turkey's healthcare system is a complex entity, undergoing significant reforms in recent years. The availability of primary care is largely influenced by the country's universal health insurance system, which aims to provide access to healthcare for all citizens. However, the quality and accessibility of care can vary depending on location, socioeconomic status, and the type of healthcare provider.

Physician-to-patient ratios in Turkey are generally lower than in many developed countries. This could translate to longer wait times and potential challenges in accessing timely care, especially in rural areas. The distribution of physicians is also a factor. Major cities often have a higher concentration of specialists, while rural regions might face shortages, particularly in primary care. The government is actively working to address these disparities through various initiatives.

"Standout practices" in Turkey can be identified by factors similar to those in the US. Practices that prioritize patient satisfaction, embrace technology, and offer a wide range of services are likely to be considered high-quality. Private hospitals and clinics often have more advanced technology and offer a wider range of specialized services. The government also regulates the standards of care across the country.

Telemedicine adoption in Turkey has been growing, although it may still be less widespread than in some Western countries. The government is investing in telehealth infrastructure to improve access to healthcare, particularly in remote areas. Telemedicine can be especially beneficial in providing access to specialists and mental health services.

Mental health resources in Turkey are a significant area of focus. The government has been working to expand mental health services, including increasing the number of mental health professionals and establishing more mental health clinics. Cultural factors also influence the approach to mental health, and the stigma associated with mental illness can sometimes hinder access to care. Public awareness campaigns and educational programs are essential to address these challenges.

**Comparative Assessment and Conclusion**

Comparing the two contexts is challenging due to the differing scales and data availability. However, some general observations can be made. The US ZIP code, assuming it is in a developed area, might have access to more advanced technology and a wider range of specialized services. However, the Turkish healthcare system, with its universal insurance, strives to provide access to healthcare for all citizens.

Both locations face challenges. The US ZIP code might struggle with physician shortages or disparities in access, while Turkey might grapple with lower physician-to-patient ratios and geographic disparities in access. Both locations are working to improve telemedicine adoption and mental health resources.

To gain a more in-depth understanding of healthcare access and resources in specific geographic locations, consider exploring the use of interactive mapping tools. These tools allow you to visualize data, identify patterns, and make informed decisions about healthcare planning and resource allocation.

**Call to Action:**

Interested in visualizing healthcare data and identifying areas with the greatest need? Explore the power of CartoChrome maps to uncover valuable insights into healthcare landscapes. CartoChrome maps can help you analyze physician distribution, identify underserved communities, and optimize healthcare resource allocation.