The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 28520, Cedar Island, North Carolina is 15 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 90.73 percent of the residents in 28520 has some form of health insurance. 49.19 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 67.74 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28520 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 12 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28520. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 88 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 43 health care providers accessible to residents in 28520, Cedar Island, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 28520, Cedar Island, North Carolina
Overall Health Score | 45 |
---|---|
People Score | 88 |
Provider Score | 15 |
Hospital Score | 66 |
Travel Score | 17 |
28520 | Cedar Island | North Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 40.32 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 833.33 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 113.64 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Cedar Island, NC (ZIP Code 28520)
Assessing the overall health landscape within Cedar Island, North Carolina (ZIP code 28520), requires a multifaceted approach. We must consider not only the presence and quality of medical professionals but also the accessibility of care, the integration of technology, and the availability of crucial support services. This analysis aims to provide an "Overall Health Score" based on these factors, offering a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare environment in this specific coastal community.
The foundation of any health assessment lies in the availability of primary care physicians. In Cedar Island, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical metric. Rural communities often face challenges in attracting and retaining medical professionals, leading to potential shortages. A low ratio, indicating a limited number of doctors per capita, can translate to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and increased strain on existing providers. Determining the precise physician-to-patient ratio for this specific ZIP code is crucial. Publicly available data from sources like the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services or the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) would be instrumental in establishing this baseline.
Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of primary care practices is paramount. Identifying standout practices involves evaluating several factors. This includes the credentials and experience of the physicians, the range of services offered (e.g., chronic disease management, preventative screenings), and the patient satisfaction levels. Online reviews, patient testimonials, and publicly available quality metrics (if available) can provide valuable insights into the reputation and performance of local practices. Furthermore, the presence of a diverse medical team, including nurses, physician assistants, and other healthcare professionals, can enhance the overall capacity and responsiveness of the healthcare system.
Telemedicine adoption is another crucial aspect of modern healthcare delivery, especially in rural areas. Telemedicine offers the potential to bridge geographical barriers, providing patients with access to medical consultations, follow-up appointments, and even remote monitoring services. Assessing the extent to which local practices have embraced telemedicine is vital. This includes determining the availability of virtual appointments, the use of remote patient monitoring technologies, and the integration of telehealth platforms into existing workflows. Practices that have successfully adopted telemedicine can significantly improve access to care and enhance patient convenience.
Mental health resources are often under-resourced in rural settings. The availability of mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and therapists, is a critical component of a comprehensive healthcare system. Assessing the number of mental health providers in the area, their specialties, and the availability of support services (e.g., counseling, support groups) is essential. Furthermore, the integration of mental health services into primary care practices is a positive indicator, as it promotes early detection and intervention for mental health concerns. The existence of crisis intervention services and access to psychiatric medications are also vital considerations.
The physical infrastructure of healthcare facilities also plays a role. The presence of a well-equipped clinic or medical center, with access to diagnostic equipment (e.g., X-ray machines, laboratory services), can significantly improve the quality of care. The availability of emergency services, including ambulance services and proximity to a hospital, is also crucial, particularly in a coastal community where access to care can be affected by weather events or other emergencies.
In addition to these core factors, the overall health score should also consider the community's demographics and socioeconomic factors. The age distribution of the population, the prevalence of chronic diseases, and the socioeconomic status of residents can all influence healthcare needs and utilization. For example, a community with a large elderly population may require more geriatric care services, while a community with a high prevalence of chronic diseases may need more resources for disease management and prevention.
The analysis should also take into account any community health initiatives or programs that are in place. This could include public health campaigns, health education programs, or partnerships between healthcare providers and community organizations. These initiatives can help to promote healthy behaviors, prevent disease, and improve overall health outcomes.
Furthermore, the analysis should consider the accessibility of healthcare services for all residents, regardless of their income, insurance status, or other factors. This includes assessing the availability of financial assistance programs, the acceptance of various insurance plans, and the provision of care to uninsured patients.
Finally, the overall health score should be dynamic and subject to ongoing monitoring and evaluation. The healthcare landscape is constantly evolving, and it is essential to track changes in physician availability, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and other key indicators. This ongoing monitoring can help to identify areas where improvements are needed and to ensure that the healthcare system is meeting the needs of the community.
Based on these factors, the "Overall Health Score" for Cedar Island (28520) would be a composite metric, reflecting the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system. A higher score would indicate a more robust and accessible healthcare environment, while a lower score would suggest areas where improvements are needed. The precise score would depend on the specific data collected and the weighting assigned to each factor. A comprehensive assessment would also include recommendations for improving healthcare access and quality in the community.
To gain a visual understanding of the healthcare landscape in Cedar Island and surrounding areas, including the location of medical facilities, the distribution of healthcare professionals, and the availability of resources, consider exploring interactive maps. **CartoChrome maps** can provide a dynamic and informative visualization of this data, helping you to understand the healthcare environment in detail.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like