28552, Lowland, North Carolina Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 28552, Lowland, North Carolina is 16 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 87.98 percent of the residents in 28552 has some form of health insurance. 83.72 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 31.78 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28552 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 102 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28552. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 90 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 97 health care providers accessible to residents in 28552, Lowland, North Carolina.

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 28552 & Primary Care Availability in Lowland

This analysis provides an overall health score assessment for the medical landscape within ZIP code 28552, focusing on the availability of primary care physicians and related resources, specifically within the context of the Lowland community. The evaluation considers physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout medical practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. The aim is to offer a comprehensive view of the healthcare ecosystem and identify areas of strength and weakness.

The foundation of any health score analysis rests on the availability of primary care physicians. In 28552, which encompasses the Lowland community, the physician-to-patient ratio is a crucial indicator. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potentially poorer health outcomes. Determining the precise ratio requires data collection from various sources, including state medical boards, insurance providers, and local healthcare facilities. Publicly available data may offer a general estimate, but a more granular assessment necessitates a detailed investigation. This should include the number of actively practicing primary care physicians (family medicine, internal medicine, and general practitioners) within the ZIP code, and the estimated population served.

Beyond the raw numbers, the quality and accessibility of existing practices are paramount. Standout practices often distinguish themselves through a combination of factors. These include a commitment to patient-centered care, a focus on preventative medicine, and the utilization of advanced technologies. These practices might have a strong reputation within the community, as evidenced by patient reviews, referrals, and recognition from professional organizations. They might also demonstrate a commitment to serving underserved populations or individuals with specific health needs. The presence of these standout practices can significantly elevate the overall health score, even if the physician-to-patient ratio is less than ideal.

Telemedicine adoption is another critical component of the overall health score. The ability to access healthcare remotely, through video consultations, phone calls, and online portals, has become increasingly important, particularly in rural areas like Lowland. Telemedicine can overcome geographical barriers, improve access to specialists, and provide convenient options for routine check-ups and follow-up appointments. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering a range of virtual services, contribute positively to the health score. The extent of telemedicine adoption should be assessed by examining the availability of virtual appointments, the types of services offered remotely, and the patient satisfaction with these services.

Mental health resources are a vital, yet often overlooked, aspect of overall health. The availability of mental health professionals, including psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and counselors, significantly impacts the community's well-being. Access to these resources is crucial for addressing mental health concerns, reducing stigma, and promoting overall health. The health score analysis must consider the number of mental health providers within the ZIP code, the types of services they offer (e.g., individual therapy, group therapy, medication management), and the availability of support groups and other community resources. A shortage of mental health professionals, or limited access to services, would negatively impact the overall health score.

Specific practices within 28552 should be evaluated based on these criteria. For example, a practice known for its patient-centered approach, its adoption of electronic health records, and its commitment to preventative care would likely receive a higher rating. Conversely, a practice with limited availability, long wait times, and a lack of telemedicine options would receive a lower rating. The assessment should consider the diversity of services offered, the practice’s ability to accommodate patients with different needs, and its overall impact on the community's health outcomes.

The analysis also requires consideration of the broader healthcare ecosystem. This includes the presence of hospitals, urgent care centers, pharmacies, and other healthcare facilities within the ZIP code and the surrounding areas. The proximity and accessibility of these facilities, and the services they offer, are crucial factors in determining the overall health score. The availability of specialized care, such as cardiology, oncology, and dermatology, also contributes to the overall assessment. A well-integrated healthcare system, with a range of services readily available, will positively impact the health score.

Furthermore, the analysis should consider the socio-economic factors that influence health outcomes. These include income levels, educational attainment, access to healthy food, and housing conditions. Communities with higher rates of poverty, lower levels of education, and limited access to resources often experience poorer health outcomes. These factors can influence the demand for healthcare services and the ability of individuals to access them. The analysis should consider these social determinants of health and their impact on the overall health score.

In the context of Lowland, the analysis should specifically address the unique challenges and opportunities presented by the community. This may include considering the demographics of the population, the prevalence of specific health conditions, and the availability of culturally sensitive healthcare services. The analysis should also identify any community-based initiatives or programs that are working to improve health outcomes.

In conclusion, assessing the overall health score for doctors in 28552 and primary care availability in Lowland requires a comprehensive evaluation of various factors. This includes physician-to-patient ratios, the quality and accessibility of medical practices, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, and the broader healthcare ecosystem. By considering these factors, and addressing the unique characteristics of the Lowland community, a more accurate and insightful assessment can be achieved.

To gain a visual understanding of the healthcare landscape in 28552 and Lowland, including physician locations, practice types, and resource availability, consider exploring a CartoChrome map. These maps offer a dynamic and interactive way to visualize healthcare data, allowing you to identify areas of strength and weakness and make informed decisions about your healthcare needs.