The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 28761, Nebo, North Carolina is 43 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 87.42 percent of the residents in 28761 has some form of health insurance. 41.04 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 62.90 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28761 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,084 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28761. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,510 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,626 health care providers accessible to residents in 28761, Nebo, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 28761, Nebo, North Carolina
Overall Health Score | 29 |
---|---|
People Score | 21 |
Provider Score | 43 |
Hospital Score | 55 |
Travel Score | 43 |
28761 | Nebo | North Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 672.99 | 31,640.78 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 4,405.66 | 206,500.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 2,866.87 | 133,696.59 | 0.00 |
The health landscape of Nebo, North Carolina, specifically within the 28761 ZIP code, presents a complex picture when evaluating overall health scores. Assessing the availability and quality of primary care physicians, alongside associated resources, is crucial to understanding the community's health well-being. This analysis aims to provide a comprehensive overview, considering various factors that contribute to a robust healthcare system.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a foundational metric. A low ratio, indicating a scarcity of doctors relative to the population, can strain the system, potentially leading to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and ultimately, poorer health outcomes. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests greater accessibility. Determining the precise physician-to-patient ratio for 28761 requires specific data from healthcare providers and population figures, a task that demands careful data collection and analysis. Publicly available sources like the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) often provide this data, but it is critical to verify the information's currency and accuracy.
Beyond simple ratios, the quality of care is paramount. Identifying standout practices within the Nebo area necessitates an examination of several factors. Patient satisfaction scores, often gathered through surveys and online reviews, provide valuable insights into the patient experience. Accreditation status, such as those granted by organizations like the Joint Commission, indicates adherence to rigorous standards of care and safety. The presence of specialized services, such as chronic disease management programs or preventative care initiatives, further elevates a practice's profile.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor in evaluating healthcare accessibility. Telemedicine, the use of technology to deliver healthcare remotely, can significantly improve access, particularly for those in rural areas or with mobility limitations. The availability of virtual consultations, remote monitoring capabilities, and online patient portals can enhance convenience and improve patient engagement. Practices that have embraced telemedicine demonstrate a commitment to innovation and patient-centered care. The specifics of telemedicine adoption – the types of services offered, the platforms used, and the patient populations served – are all essential considerations.
Mental health resources are an indispensable component of overall health. Access to mental health professionals, including psychiatrists, psychologists, and therapists, is crucial for addressing the growing needs of the community. The availability of these resources, along with support groups and mental health education programs, contributes significantly to the well-being of residents. Assessing the availability of these resources requires identifying the number of mental health providers, the types of services offered, and the accessibility of these services, including insurance acceptance and affordability.
Furthermore, the integration of mental health services with primary care is an important consideration. Co-location of mental health professionals within primary care practices or collaborative care models can facilitate early detection and treatment of mental health conditions. This integrated approach can improve outcomes and reduce the stigma associated with seeking mental health care.
The presence of community health centers and other safety-net providers also plays a vital role. These facilities often serve vulnerable populations and provide essential services, regardless of ability to pay. Their existence and the scope of their services are critical indicators of the community's commitment to healthcare equity. Examining the services offered, the populations served, and the funding models of these centers provides a more complete picture of the healthcare landscape.
Another important consideration is the prevalence of chronic diseases within the community. Data on the rates of diabetes, heart disease, and other chronic conditions can help assess the effectiveness of preventative care initiatives and disease management programs. Analyzing this data can also identify areas where targeted interventions are needed to improve health outcomes.
The quality of hospital facilities and emergency services is also a crucial factor. The presence of a nearby hospital with a comprehensive range of services, including specialized care units, is essential for addressing acute medical needs. Assessing the quality of these facilities requires examining factors such as accreditation status, patient outcomes, and the availability of advanced medical technologies.
The accessibility of transportation to healthcare facilities is another key consideration, particularly in a rural area like Nebo. The availability of public transportation, ride-sharing services, and other transportation options can significantly impact patients' ability to access care. Assessing the transportation infrastructure and identifying any barriers to access is an important part of the overall health assessment.
Finally, the community's overall health literacy plays a role in determining the overall health score. Health literacy refers to the ability of individuals to understand and use health information to make informed decisions about their health. Efforts to improve health literacy, such as providing educational materials and promoting health awareness campaigns, can empower individuals to take control of their health and improve their outcomes.
In conclusion, determining an 'Overall Health Score' for doctors in ZIP code 28761 and primary care availability in Nebo requires a multifaceted approach. It involves analyzing physician-to-patient ratios, evaluating the quality of care provided by standout practices, assessing telemedicine adoption, and evaluating the availability of mental health resources. Additionally, the presence of community health centers, the prevalence of chronic diseases, the quality of hospital facilities, the accessibility of transportation, and the community's health literacy must be considered. This complex interplay of factors determines the overall health and well-being of the Nebo community.
To gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Nebo and visualize the geographic distribution of resources, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can provide valuable insights into the location of healthcare providers, the availability of services, and other relevant data, enabling a more comprehensive understanding of the community's health resources.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like