08353, Shiloh, New Jersey Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 08353, Shiloh, New Jersey is 43 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 89.47 percent of the residents in 08353 has some form of health insurance. 47.37 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 60.99 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 08353 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 59 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 08353. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 72 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 527 health care providers accessible to residents in 08353, Shiloh, New Jersey.

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Shiloh, NJ (ZIP Code 08353)

Analyzing the overall health landscape of Shiloh, New Jersey (ZIP Code 08353) requires a multifaceted approach. We must consider the availability of primary care physicians, the resources dedicated to mental health, the adoption of telemedicine, and the overall physician-to-patient ratio. This analysis aims to provide a comprehensive health score assessment, identifying strengths and weaknesses within the community.

The physician-to-patient ratio is a crucial indicator of access to care. Determining the precise ratio for Shiloh requires data from various sources. We need to consider the total population of the ZIP code and the number of actively practicing primary care physicians within the area. This data is often available through state medical boards, the US Census Bureau, and potentially local healthcare organizations. A higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, suggests a potential challenge in accessing timely appointments and consistent care. Conversely, a lower ratio indicates better access.

Primary care availability is the cornerstone of preventative healthcare. Assessing this involves identifying the number of primary care practices within the ZIP code and evaluating their capacity. Factors to consider include the number of physicians at each practice, the hours of operation, and the acceptance of new patients. Practices with extended hours, weekend availability, and a willingness to accept new patients are generally considered more accessible. Additionally, the types of insurance accepted by these practices are critical. A lack of acceptance of common insurance plans can create a barrier to care for many residents.

Standout practices within Shiloh should be identified based on several criteria. This includes patient reviews, the range of services offered, and their integration of technology. Practices that offer comprehensive care, including preventative screenings, chronic disease management, and same-day appointments, are often highly regarded. The use of electronic health records (EHRs) and patient portals enhances communication and allows for better care coordination. Practices with a strong reputation for patient satisfaction, as evidenced by online reviews and testimonials, are also considered standout performers.

Telemedicine adoption is becoming increasingly important, particularly in rural areas. The availability of telehealth services allows patients to access care remotely, reducing the need for travel and potentially improving access for those with mobility issues or transportation limitations. Assessing telemedicine adoption involves identifying which primary care practices offer telehealth consultations, the types of services available through telehealth, and the technology used. Practices that readily embrace telehealth can significantly improve access to care, especially for follow-up appointments and consultations.

Mental health resources are an essential component of overall health. The analysis must evaluate the availability of mental health professionals, including psychiatrists, psychologists, and therapists, within the ZIP code or in close proximity. Assessing the availability of mental health services involves identifying the number of mental health providers, the types of services offered (e.g., individual therapy, group therapy, medication management), and the acceptance of insurance. Furthermore, the presence of community mental health centers, support groups, and crisis intervention services are critical indicators of a robust mental health infrastructure.

The overall health score for Shiloh should reflect a balanced assessment of all these factors. A high score would indicate a favorable physician-to-patient ratio, readily available primary care with extended hours and new patient acceptance, standout practices with positive patient reviews and integrated technology, widespread telemedicine adoption, and a robust network of mental health resources. Conversely, a low score would indicate challenges in one or more of these areas. For example, a low physician-to-patient ratio coupled with limited mental health services and a lack of telemedicine adoption would significantly lower the overall score.

Specific examples of practices and resources are critical to the analysis. For example, if “Shiloh Family Practice” is a well-regarded practice known for its comprehensive services and patient satisfaction, it would be highlighted as a strength. Conversely, the lack of a local mental health clinic or the limited availability of therapists would be identified as a weakness. The analysis would also consider the presence of local pharmacies, urgent care facilities, and hospitals, as these resources contribute to the overall health ecosystem.

Analyzing the accessibility of care for specific populations is also important. Are there services specifically designed to meet the needs of the elderly, children, or individuals with disabilities? The availability of language services for non-English speakers and the accessibility of facilities for individuals with mobility challenges are also important considerations.

The analysis should also consider the socioeconomic factors that can impact health outcomes. Factors such as poverty rates, educational attainment, and access to healthy food options can significantly influence the health of a community. These factors, while not directly related to healthcare availability, are essential to understanding the overall health landscape.

The analysis must be dynamic, as the healthcare landscape is constantly evolving. The availability of physicians, the adoption of new technologies, and the availability of resources can change rapidly. The analysis should be updated regularly to reflect these changes and provide the most accurate assessment of the overall health score.

The final overall health score should be presented in a clear and concise manner, with a summary of the strengths and weaknesses of the community's healthcare system. This summary should be easily understandable by the general public and policymakers. The analysis should also include recommendations for improvement, such as increasing the number of primary care physicians, expanding telemedicine services, or improving access to mental health resources.

This comprehensive analysis provides a valuable framework for understanding the health of Shiloh, NJ (ZIP Code 08353). It identifies areas of strength and weakness, providing a roadmap for improving the health and well-being of the community.