The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 15218, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania is 95 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 94.55 percent of the residents in 15218 has some form of health insurance. 32.76 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 74.56 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15218 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 2,386 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 201 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15218. An estimate of 171 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,384 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 67,672 health care providers accessible to residents in 15218, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 15218, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Overall Health Score | 89 |
---|---|
People Score | 42 |
Provider Score | 95 |
Hospital Score | 58 |
Travel Score | 64 |
15218 | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 6,876.06 | 285.81 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 41,663.67 | 1,606.71 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 38,083.05 | 1,572.73 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 15218 & Primary Care Availability in Pittsburgh
Analyzing the overall health landscape within ZIP code 15218, a key area within Pittsburgh, and assessing the broader primary care availability across the city requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis will consider physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources, culminating in an overall health score assessment.
The physician-to-patient ratio serves as a foundational metric. A higher ratio, indicating more patients per doctor, can potentially lead to longer wait times for appointments and reduced individual attention. Data from the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) and similar sources would be essential to determine the specific physician-to-patient ratio within 15218. This would then be compared to the average ratio for Pittsburgh and national benchmarks. Areas with significantly lower ratios may experience challenges in accessing timely care.
Within ZIP code 15218, the presence of established and well-regarded primary care practices is crucial. Identifying standout practices involves evaluating factors like patient reviews, accreditations (e.g., from the National Committee for Quality Assurance), and the range of services offered. Does the practice offer comprehensive care, including preventative screenings, chronic disease management, and same-day appointments? Are they integrated with larger healthcare systems, potentially offering access to a wider network of specialists and resources? Practices that demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care, incorporating patient feedback and utilizing innovative approaches, would likely score higher.
The adoption of telemedicine is another critical factor influencing the overall health score. Telemedicine, including virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient portals, can significantly improve access to care, particularly for individuals with mobility limitations, those living in underserved areas, or those with busy schedules. Examining the prevalence of telemedicine services among primary care providers in 15218 is essential. Are practices offering virtual appointments for routine check-ups, medication refills, or follow-up consultations? The ease of use and integration of these technologies into the patient experience also impact the score. Practices that embrace and effectively utilize telemedicine will likely receive a higher score.
Mental health resources are an integral part of overall health. The availability of mental health services within the primary care setting and within the broader community is vital. Does the practice offer in-house mental health services, such as counseling or psychiatric support? Are they connected to a network of mental health specialists, including therapists and psychiatrists, for referrals? Assessing the accessibility of mental health resources, including the availability of appointments, the acceptance of insurance, and the provision of culturally competent care, is essential. Areas with limited access to mental health services would negatively impact the overall health score.
Expanding beyond 15218 to assess primary care availability across Pittsburgh requires a broader perspective. Analyzing the distribution of primary care providers across different neighborhoods, considering the socioeconomic demographics of each area, is necessary. Are there areas with limited access to primary care, potentially creating healthcare disparities? This analysis would involve mapping the location of primary care practices, analyzing the patient populations they serve, and identifying any geographical gaps in access.
Furthermore, the integration of primary care providers with hospitals, specialists, and other healthcare providers is a key consideration. Are primary care practices part of larger healthcare systems, offering patients access to a wider range of services and specialists? Does the practice utilize electronic health records that facilitate seamless information sharing among healthcare providers? Practices that are well-integrated into the broader healthcare ecosystem are better equipped to provide comprehensive and coordinated care.
The overall health score for 15218 and Pittsburgh would be a composite score, reflecting the weighted average of the factors discussed above. The physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of primary care practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources would all contribute to the final score. Areas with higher physician-to-patient ratios, limited access to telemedicine, and inadequate mental health resources would receive lower scores. Conversely, areas with a robust network of primary care providers, a high adoption rate of telemedicine, and readily available mental health services would receive higher scores.
The analysis would also consider the impact of social determinants of health, such as income, education, and access to transportation. These factors can significantly influence health outcomes and must be considered when assessing the overall health score. Areas with high levels of poverty or limited access to transportation may require additional resources and interventions to improve health outcomes.
Ultimately, the goal of this analysis is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the health landscape in 15218 and Pittsburgh. This information can be used to identify areas of strength and weakness, inform healthcare planning and resource allocation, and ultimately improve the health and well-being of the community. The specific methodology for calculating the overall health score would involve collecting data from various sources, including public health agencies, healthcare providers, and patient surveys. The weighting of each factor would be determined based on its relative importance in influencing health outcomes.
If you're interested in a visual representation of this data, including maps of physician density, telemedicine adoption rates, and mental health resource locations, consider exploring the interactive maps provided by CartoChrome. Their platform can help you visualize the complex healthcare landscape of Pittsburgh and 15218, providing valuable insights for healthcare professionals, policymakers, and residents.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like