15338, Greensboro, Pennsylvania Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 15338, Greensboro, Pennsylvania is 42 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 96.72 percent of the residents in 15338 has some form of health insurance. 46.38 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 70.89 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15338 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 524 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15338. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 271 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 793 health care providers accessible to residents in 15338, Greensboro, Pennsylvania.

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 15338 and Primary Care Availability in Greensboro

This analysis provides an overall health score assessment, comparing the landscape of medical care within ZIP code 15338 (a region we will assume is in Pennsylvania) and the primary care availability in Greensboro, North Carolina. The evaluation considers physician-to-patient ratios, notable medical practices, telemedicine integration, and the accessibility of mental health services. This comparative perspective aims to offer a nuanced understanding of healthcare strengths and weaknesses in each area.

**ZIP Code 15338 (Pennsylvania): A Detailed Examination**

The physician-to-patient ratio within ZIP code 15338 is a critical indicator of healthcare accessibility. A higher ratio, reflecting fewer doctors per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced patient access, and potential delays in preventative care. Data collection from local health departments and state medical boards is essential to determine the exact ratio. The analysis would need to account for specialists practicing within the area who also see patients, as well as the presence of any federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), which can significantly impact the availability of primary care for underserved populations.

Identifying standout medical practices in 15338 requires a multi-faceted approach. This involves examining factors such as patient satisfaction scores, the range of services offered, and the adoption of innovative technologies. Practices that embrace electronic health records (EHRs) and patient portals often demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care and improved communication. Furthermore, the presence of practices that offer extended hours or weekend appointments can enhance access to care for individuals with demanding work schedules. A review of online reviews, patient testimonials, and physician ratings would be crucial in pinpointing practices that consistently deliver high-quality care.

Telemedicine adoption in 15338 is another key area of evaluation. The availability of telehealth services, including virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online prescription refills, can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. Assessing the extent to which local practices have integrated telemedicine into their service offerings, including the types of services offered via telehealth and the technology platforms used, is essential. The analysis should also consider the level of patient and physician acceptance of telemedicine and the impact on patient outcomes.

Mental health resources are often a critical component of overall health. The availability of mental health professionals, including psychiatrists, psychologists, and licensed therapists, within 15338 is a key indicator of the community's ability to address mental health needs. The analysis should examine the number of mental health providers, the types of services they offer, and the availability of specialized programs, such as those for substance abuse or eating disorders. Furthermore, it should consider the integration of mental health services into primary care practices, as this can improve early detection and treatment of mental health conditions.

**Primary Care Availability in Greensboro, North Carolina: A Comparative View**

The assessment of primary care availability in Greensboro, North Carolina, necessitates a similar approach, with a focus on physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resource accessibility. The analysis should benchmark Greensboro's physician-to-patient ratio against state and national averages to determine its relative standing. The presence of large healthcare systems, such as hospitals and university-affiliated medical centers, can significantly impact the availability of primary care physicians.

Identifying standout primary care practices in Greensboro involves evaluating similar criteria as in 15338, including patient satisfaction, service offerings, and technological integration. However, the analysis should also consider the presence of any patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs), which are practices that emphasize coordinated, comprehensive, and patient-focused care. The analysis should also examine the availability of multilingual services, as this can improve access to care for diverse populations.

Telemedicine adoption in Greensboro is an important factor. The extent to which primary care practices have embraced telehealth, including the types of services offered and the technology platforms used, can significantly impact patient access and convenience. The analysis should also consider the availability of telehealth services for specific populations, such as those with chronic conditions or those living in underserved areas.

Mental health resources in Greensboro are an important factor. The analysis should assess the number of mental health providers, the types of services offered, and the availability of specialized programs. The integration of mental health services into primary care practices is also a key consideration, as this can improve early detection and treatment of mental health conditions.

**Comparative Analysis and Conclusion**

A comparative analysis of the two areas requires a direct comparison of the findings from each location. This includes comparing physician-to-patient ratios, identifying any disparities in access to care, and evaluating the extent to which each area has embraced telehealth and integrated mental health services. This comparative perspective allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of each area's healthcare landscape.

The overall health score for each area will be a composite measure based on the factors discussed above. The analysis will highlight areas where each location excels and areas where improvements are needed. For example, one area might have a higher physician-to-patient ratio but demonstrate greater adoption of telemedicine, while the other might have better access to mental health resources. The final score will reflect a balanced assessment of these factors.

This analysis provides a general overview of the healthcare landscape in ZIP code 15338 and Greensboro, North Carolina. A comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape in these areas requires a more detailed examination of available data and local conditions.

**Actionable Insight: Visualize Healthcare Data with CartoChrome Maps**

For a deeper dive into the data and a visual representation of the healthcare landscape, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can help visualize physician density, access to care, and the distribution of mental health resources in both ZIP code 15338 and Greensboro. This visual approach can reveal patterns and insights that might be missed in a traditional analysis. Explore the power of data visualization and gain a more comprehensive understanding of healthcare disparities and opportunities.