16052, Prospect, Pennsylvania Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 16052, Prospect, Pennsylvania is 55 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 94.83 percent of the residents in 16052 has some form of health insurance. 26.36 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 83.64 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16052 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 388 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 7 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16052. An estimate of 12 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 456 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 4,354 health care providers accessible to residents in 16052, Prospect, Pennsylvania.

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Prospect, PA (ZIP Code 16052)

This analysis provides an "Overall Health Score" assessment for the availability and quality of primary care services within Prospect, Pennsylvania (ZIP Code 16052). The evaluation considers physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. This comprehensive overview aims to offer insights into the healthcare landscape of the community.

Prospect, a borough in Butler County, Pennsylvania, presents a unique demographic profile that influences its healthcare needs. The age distribution, socioeconomic factors, and lifestyle choices of the residents contribute to the overall health profile of the area. Understanding these nuances is crucial for a fair assessment of the healthcare system.

One of the fundamental metrics for evaluating healthcare access is the physician-to-patient ratio. This ratio indicates the number of physicians available to serve a specific population. A lower ratio generally signifies better access to care, while a higher ratio may indicate potential challenges in securing timely appointments and receiving comprehensive medical attention. Data from various sources, including the Pennsylvania Department of Health and the American Medical Association, is used to estimate this ratio for the 16052 ZIP code. The analysis considers the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) actively practicing within the area, factoring in specialists who may also provide primary care services.

The physician-to-patient ratio in Prospect is then benchmarked against state and national averages. This comparison helps to determine whether the community faces a shortage or surplus of primary care physicians relative to other areas. The analysis also considers the distribution of PCPs within the ZIP code, identifying potential disparities in access based on geographic location within the borough.

Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of care is assessed by examining the presence of standout practices. These practices are identified through patient reviews, accreditation status, and the adoption of innovative healthcare models. Practices with high patient satisfaction scores, recognized for their quality of care by organizations like the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA), and those employing advanced technologies are given higher consideration. The analysis also considers the range of services offered, including preventative care, chronic disease management, and specialized programs.

The adoption of telemedicine is another crucial factor in the evaluation. Telemedicine, the use of technology to provide healthcare services remotely, has become increasingly important, particularly in rural and underserved areas. The analysis examines the availability of telemedicine options among primary care providers in Prospect. This includes the availability of virtual consultations, remote monitoring programs, and online patient portals. Practices that have embraced telemedicine are often better positioned to provide convenient and accessible care, especially for patients with mobility issues or those living in remote locations.

The availability of mental health resources is a critical component of overall health. The analysis assesses the integration of mental healthcare within the primary care setting in Prospect. This includes the availability of on-site mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and licensed clinical social workers. The analysis also considers the referral pathways for patients needing specialized mental health services and the awareness of local mental health support organizations. The integration of mental health services with primary care is often associated with improved patient outcomes and reduced stigma.

The analysis also considers the presence of any unique healthcare programs or initiatives within Prospect. This could include community health centers, mobile health clinics, or partnerships between healthcare providers and local organizations. These initiatives can help to address specific health needs within the community and improve access to care for vulnerable populations.

The assessment also considers the level of health insurance coverage within the community. The percentage of residents with health insurance is a key indicator of access to care. The analysis utilizes data from the U.S. Census Bureau and other sources to determine the insurance coverage rates within the 16052 ZIP code. Areas with high rates of uninsured individuals may face challenges in accessing primary care services.

The overall health score is derived by weighting the various factors discussed above. The physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources are all assigned specific weights based on their relative importance. The final score is then presented as a composite measure of the overall health of the primary care system in Prospect. The score is accompanied by a detailed narrative that explains the methodology, the data sources, and the key findings.

The analysis also considers the potential for future improvements in healthcare access and quality. This includes identifying areas where the healthcare system could be strengthened, such as increasing the number of primary care physicians, expanding telemedicine services, and improving the integration of mental health care. The analysis also considers the potential impact of new healthcare policies and technologies on the community.

The findings of this analysis are intended to inform residents, healthcare providers, and policymakers about the strengths and weaknesses of the primary care system in Prospect. The goal is to promote a better understanding of the healthcare landscape and to support efforts to improve the health and well-being of the community.

The analysis is presented in a clear and concise manner, using plain language to make the information accessible to a broad audience. The report includes supporting data and statistics to back up the findings. The analysis also provides recommendations for improving the healthcare system in Prospect.

The final "Overall Health Score" for primary care availability in Prospect, PA (ZIP Code 16052) is a snapshot of the current situation. It is important to note that the healthcare landscape is constantly evolving. Factors such as changes in physician availability, advancements in medical technology, and shifts in healthcare policy can all impact the overall health score over time.

For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in Prospect, including the locations of primary care providers, hospitals, and other healthcare facilities, and to analyze the geographic distribution of health resources, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps offer interactive visualizations that can help you understand the spatial relationships between healthcare providers and the population they serve.