16124, Fredonia, Pennsylvania Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 16124, Fredonia, Pennsylvania is 56 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 76.85 percent of the residents in 16124 has some form of health insurance. 32.89 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 56.40 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16124 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 413 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16124. An estimate of 3 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 312 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 4,008 health care providers accessible to residents in 16124, Fredonia, Pennsylvania.

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 16124 & Primary Care Availability in Fredonia

Evaluating the overall health landscape within a specific geographic area requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis delves into the availability and quality of primary care physicians in Fredonia, focusing on the ZIP code 16124, to provide an 'Overall Health Score' assessment. We will examine physician-to-patient ratios, identify standout practices, explore telemedicine adoption rates, and assess the availability of mental health resources. This comprehensive evaluation aims to offer insights into the accessibility and quality of healthcare available to residents.

One of the primary indicators of health access is the physician-to-patient ratio. A lower ratio, meaning more physicians per capita, generally signifies better access to care. While specific, real-time data on physician counts within 16124 can fluctuate, publicly available resources, such as the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), can offer estimates and comparisons to national averages. Analyzing these figures is crucial. A significantly higher patient-to-physician ratio than the national benchmark might indicate a shortage, potentially leading to longer wait times for appointments and increased pressure on existing healthcare providers. This is a critical factor in determining the overall health score.

Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of care is equally important. Identifying standout practices involves assessing factors such as patient reviews, accreditation status (e.g., Joint Commission), and the range of services offered. Practices that consistently receive positive feedback, demonstrate a commitment to quality improvement, and offer a comprehensive suite of primary care services (preventive care, chronic disease management, etc.) contribute positively to the overall health score. Conversely, practices with negative reviews, limited service offerings, or a history of quality concerns would negatively impact the score. Investigating the presence of specialists within the area, or readily accessible referral networks, also influences the overall assessment.

Telemedicine adoption has significantly reshaped healthcare delivery, particularly in rural or underserved areas. The extent to which primary care physicians in 16124 have embraced telemedicine is a key consideration. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient portals demonstrate a commitment to patient convenience and accessibility. This is especially important for residents with mobility limitations or those living in remote areas. Higher telemedicine adoption rates contribute to a higher overall health score, signifying improved access and convenience. Conversely, a lack of telemedicine options could negatively impact the score, particularly for those who find it difficult to travel.

Mental health resources are an integral component of overall health. The availability of mental health services, including psychiatrists, therapists, and counseling centers, within or near 16124 significantly impacts the overall health score. Assessing the number of mental health providers per capita, the types of services offered (individual therapy, group therapy, medication management), and the accessibility of these services (insurance acceptance, wait times) is crucial. A shortage of mental health providers or limited access to services would negatively impact the overall health score. Conversely, a robust network of mental health resources would contribute positively.

The geographical distribution of healthcare providers also plays a vital role. Are primary care physicians clustered in one area, or are they distributed throughout the ZIP code? This impacts accessibility, particularly for residents who may not have reliable transportation. Analyzing the geographic density of providers and identifying any "healthcare deserts" is essential. The presence of urgent care facilities or walk-in clinics can also mitigate the impact of physician shortages and contribute positively to the overall health score.

Furthermore, the availability of ancillary services, such as pharmacies, diagnostic imaging centers, and physical therapy clinics, contributes to the overall assessment. The proximity and accessibility of these services can significantly impact the patient experience and overall health outcomes. A well-integrated healthcare ecosystem, where primary care physicians can easily refer patients to necessary services, enhances the overall health score.

The overall health score is not a static number; it is a dynamic assessment that reflects the evolving healthcare landscape. Regular updates and re-evaluations are necessary to capture changes in physician availability, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources. The score should be viewed as a snapshot in time, providing a valuable benchmark for assessing the health of a community.

The data gathering process for this analysis requires accessing various sources, including: public health data, physician directories, insurance provider networks, and patient review platforms. The accuracy of the overall health score depends on the quality and completeness of the data collected. It is essential to use reliable and up-to-date information to ensure an accurate assessment.

In conclusion, evaluating the overall health score for doctors in ZIP code 16124 and primary care availability in Fredonia involves a comprehensive assessment of physician-to-patient ratios, the quality of care offered by standout practices, telemedicine adoption rates, and the availability of mental health resources. The geographical distribution of providers and the presence of ancillary services are also critical factors. By analyzing these elements, we can gain a deeper understanding of the accessibility and quality of healthcare available to residents.

To gain a visual understanding of the geographical distribution of healthcare providers and other relevant data points, we recommend exploring the interactive mapping capabilities offered by CartoChrome. Their platform allows for a detailed visualization of healthcare resources, helping to identify areas of need and assess the overall health landscape.