16133, Jackson Center, Pennsylvania Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 16133, Jackson Center, Pennsylvania is 51 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 91.68 percent of the residents in 16133 has some form of health insurance. 40.73 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 65.76 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16133 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 453 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16133. An estimate of 3 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 338 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 5,580 health care providers accessible to residents in 16133, Jackson Center, Pennsylvania.

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Jackson Center, PA (ZIP Code 16133)

This analysis provides an overall health score assessment for the availability and quality of healthcare within Jackson Center, Pennsylvania (ZIP code 16133). It considers factors like physician-to-patient ratios, the prominence of specific medical practices, telemedicine integration, and the accessibility of mental health resources. The goal is to offer a comprehensive understanding of the local healthcare landscape, enabling residents to make informed decisions about their medical needs.

The foundation of a strong healthcare system lies in adequate physician availability. Assessing the physician-to-patient ratio is crucial. In Jackson Center, this data requires careful examination. The area is primarily rural, which historically presents challenges in attracting and retaining medical professionals. The ratio likely reflects this, potentially indicating a need for more primary care physicians and specialists. The specific ratio, however, requires localized data collection. Publicly available information from sources like the Pennsylvania Department of Health, the US Census Bureau, and professional medical associations would be necessary to determine the precise figure. This ratio directly impacts patient access, wait times, and the overall ability to receive timely care.

Several medical practices serve the Jackson Center area. Identifying standout practices involves evaluating factors such as patient reviews, the range of services offered, and the adoption of advanced technologies. Practices with a strong reputation for patient care, efficient appointment scheduling, and a commitment to preventative medicine would likely receive higher scores. Moreover, practices that demonstrate a focus on chronic disease management and patient education are vital in a rural setting. The size and scope of these practices are also relevant. Larger, multi-specialty clinics often provide a broader range of services, potentially improving the overall health score. Conversely, smaller, independent practices may offer a more personalized experience, appealing to specific patient preferences.

Telemedicine has emerged as a critical tool for expanding healthcare access, especially in rural areas. Its adoption within Jackson Center is a key indicator of healthcare innovation and responsiveness. Practices embracing telemedicine can offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and medication management, reducing the need for in-person visits. This is particularly beneficial for patients with mobility issues, those living far from medical facilities, and those seeking follow-up care. The extent of telemedicine integration, including the types of services offered and the ease of use for patients, significantly influences the overall health score. Practices that actively promote and utilize telemedicine are likely to contribute positively to the community's healthcare landscape.

Mental health resources are a critical component of overall well-being, and their availability in Jackson Center is a significant factor in this analysis. The assessment involves examining the presence of psychiatrists, psychologists, licensed therapists, and mental health clinics. Accessibility is key. Are these resources readily available, or are patients forced to travel long distances for care? The presence of support groups, crisis intervention services, and programs addressing substance abuse also contribute to a higher score. Furthermore, the integration of mental health services within primary care practices is a positive indicator, allowing for early detection and intervention. The overall health score benefits from a robust and accessible mental healthcare system.

The challenges of rural healthcare are well-documented. Limited access to specialists, longer travel times, and potential financial constraints are common. Jackson Center is likely to face some of these hurdles. The analysis must consider these challenges and assess how the local healthcare system addresses them. This might involve identifying innovative solutions, such as mobile health clinics, partnerships with larger healthcare systems, or community outreach programs. The resilience and adaptability of the local healthcare providers are essential for maintaining a good overall health score.

The quality of care is paramount. This involves evaluating the qualifications of the medical professionals, the accreditation of the facilities, and the patient outcomes. Data on patient satisfaction, the rates of hospital readmissions, and the effectiveness of preventative care programs are all relevant indicators. Practices that consistently demonstrate high-quality care, adhere to evidence-based guidelines, and prioritize patient safety will contribute to a higher overall health score. The availability of specialized services, such as cardiology, oncology, and physical therapy, also plays a crucial role in determining the quality of care.

Community involvement and partnerships are also important. Healthcare providers who actively engage with the community, participate in health fairs, and collaborate with local organizations are likely to contribute to a stronger healthcare ecosystem. This includes partnerships with schools, senior centers, and other community groups to promote health education and wellness initiatives. The presence of a strong network of support services, such as home healthcare agencies and transportation assistance programs, further enhances the overall health score.

Ultimately, the overall health score for Jackson Center (16133) is a complex calculation, taking into account various factors. The physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of care offered by local practices, the integration of telemedicine, the accessibility of mental health resources, and the community’s overall resilience all contribute to the final assessment. The score is not a static number but rather a reflection of the current state of healthcare within the area, with ongoing improvements and adjustments. Further research and data collection are essential for a comprehensive and accurate evaluation.

To visualize the healthcare landscape in Jackson Center and surrounding areas, consider using CartoChrome maps. These maps can provide a visual representation of physician locations, healthcare facility locations, and other relevant data, helping you understand the geographic distribution of healthcare resources and access.