The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 16224, Fairmount City, Pennsylvania is 41 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 94.63 percent of the residents in 16224 has some form of health insurance. 45.82 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 71.62 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16224 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 197 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16224. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 265 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 474 health care providers accessible to residents in 16224, Fairmount City, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 16224, Fairmount City, Pennsylvania
Overall Health Score | 52 |
---|---|
People Score | 66 |
Provider Score | 41 |
Hospital Score | 46 |
Travel Score | 42 |
16224 | Fairmount City | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 2,270.38 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 11,764.71 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 8,301.89 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The health landscape within ZIP code 16224, encompassing Fairmount City, Pennsylvania, presents a multifaceted picture of healthcare access and quality. An "Overall Health Score" analysis, considering various factors, reveals strengths and weaknesses in the provision of medical services for the residents of this rural community. This analysis will focus on physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources, ultimately offering a nuanced perspective on the healthcare ecosystem in Fairmount City.
The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator of healthcare accessibility. In 16224, the ratio likely reflects the challenges common in rural areas. A lower density of physicians, particularly primary care physicians (PCPs), often translates to longer wait times for appointments, increased travel distances for care, and potentially reduced access to preventative services. Precise figures for this specific ZIP code require data from sources like the Pennsylvania Department of Health or the US Census Bureau, which would offer the most accurate assessment. However, it's reasonable to anticipate that the ratio may be less favorable compared to more urbanized regions. This scarcity of physicians can place a significant strain on the existing healthcare infrastructure.
The presence of "standout practices" offers a potential counterbalance to the challenges posed by a lower physician-to-patient ratio. These practices, characterized by exceptional patient care, innovative service models, or specialized expertise, can serve as vital hubs for healthcare within the community. Identifying these practices requires an evaluation of factors such as patient satisfaction scores (through surveys or online reviews), the range of services offered (e.g., chronic disease management, specialized procedures), and the adoption of advanced technologies. The presence of a well-regarded family medicine practice, for instance, could significantly improve the overall health score, providing a crucial point of access for primary care needs. A practice integrating behavioral health services would also be a significant positive factor.
Telemedicine adoption is another crucial element in the healthcare equation for 16224. Given the potential for long travel distances and limited transportation options, telemedicine can be a game-changer. The ability to access virtual consultations with specialists, manage chronic conditions remotely, and receive mental health counseling via video conferencing can significantly improve patient outcomes and reduce the burden on the existing healthcare system. An assessment of telemedicine adoption would involve evaluating the availability of telehealth services offered by local practices, the technological infrastructure supporting these services (internet access speeds, availability of devices), and patient utilization rates. High adoption rates would positively influence the overall health score.
Mental health resources are an essential component of overall well-being, and their availability is a key factor in determining the health score. Rural areas often face significant challenges in providing mental health services, including a shortage of psychiatrists, therapists, and counselors. Assessing the availability of these resources in 16224 requires examining the presence of mental health clinics, the availability of individual therapists, and the accessibility of support groups or community-based mental health programs. The integration of mental health services within primary care practices is a particularly positive indicator, as it can facilitate early detection and treatment of mental health issues. A lack of adequate mental health resources would significantly detract from the overall health score.
The specific characteristics of Fairmount City, within ZIP code 16224, require a deeper dive to fully understand the landscape. The size of the population, the demographics (age distribution, socioeconomic status), and the prevalence of chronic diseases all influence the healthcare needs of the community. The presence of a local hospital or outpatient clinic, the availability of emergency medical services, and the proximity to larger healthcare facilities in neighboring towns are also important considerations.
To provide a comprehensive "Overall Health Score," one would need to gather and analyze data from various sources. This includes information on physician availability, hospital utilization rates, patient satisfaction scores, and the availability of specific healthcare services. The analysis would need to consider the unique challenges and opportunities presented by the rural setting. The score would be a composite measure, reflecting the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system in 16224.
The final score would be a valuable tool for understanding the current state of healthcare in Fairmount City. It could be used to identify areas where improvements are needed, to inform healthcare planning and resource allocation, and to track progress over time. It could also be used to raise awareness among residents about the healthcare services available to them.
The overall health score analysis for 16224, Fairmount City, would likely reveal a mixed picture. While the rural setting presents certain challenges, such as a potentially unfavorable physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and accessible mental health resources could positively influence the overall score. The key to improving the health score lies in addressing the specific needs of the community, expanding access to care, and promoting preventative health measures.
To gain a more detailed understanding of the healthcare landscape in 16224 and to visualize the geographical distribution of healthcare resources, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps provide a powerful tool for visualizing and analyzing spatial data, allowing you to see the locations of physicians, hospitals, clinics, and other healthcare facilities in relation to the population distribution. This visual representation can help identify areas with limited access to care and inform strategies for improving healthcare delivery.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like