The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 16258, Strattanville, Pennsylvania is 27 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 92.19 percent of the residents in 16258 has some form of health insurance. 34.50 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 71.85 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16258 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 314 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16258. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 331 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 441 health care providers accessible to residents in 16258, Strattanville, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 16258, Strattanville, Pennsylvania
| Overall Health Score | 27 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 29 |
| Provider Score | 27 |
| Hospital Score | 59 |
| Travel Score | 43 |
| 16258 | Strattanville | Pennsylvania | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 1,331.72 | 152,021.79 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 7,665.51 | 870,766.55 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 6,646.53 | 743,081.57 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 16258 & Primary Care Availability in Strattanville
Analyzing the overall health landscape within ZIP code 16258, which encompasses Strattanville, Pennsylvania, requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis will delve into the availability of primary care physicians, the physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of standout medical practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the accessibility of mental health resources. The goal is to provide a comprehensive ‘Overall Health Score’ assessment, offering insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare ecosystem within this specific geographic area.
The foundation of any healthy community is access to primary care physicians. In Strattanville, assessing primary care availability is critical. This involves not only counting the number of practicing physicians but also considering their specialties, appointment wait times, and the acceptance of various insurance plans. A shortage of primary care providers can lead to delayed diagnoses, increased emergency room visits for non-emergency conditions, and ultimately, poorer health outcomes. The analysis must ascertain the current primary care physician density per capita within 16258. This will be compared against regional and national averages to gauge the relative adequacy of access.
The physician-to-patient ratio is a crucial metric. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors per resident, often signals challenges in accessing timely medical care. This ratio will be calculated specifically for 16258, focusing on primary care physicians. The data will be analyzed to identify any potential disparities in access based on geographic location within the ZIP code. For example, are residents in certain areas of Strattanville facing longer travel times or appointment delays due to a lack of local physicians?
Identifying standout medical practices is also essential. This involves evaluating practices based on factors such as patient satisfaction scores, the range of services offered, the integration of technology, and the quality of care delivery. Research will be conducted to identify practices with a strong reputation within the community. This will include looking at online reviews, patient testimonials, and any awards or recognitions the practices may have received. The presence of specialized services, such as chronic disease management programs or preventative care initiatives, will also be considered.
Telemedicine adoption is another key indicator of healthcare accessibility and innovation. The analysis will investigate the extent to which local medical practices offer telemedicine services, such as virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient portals. The adoption of telemedicine can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. The analysis will assess the types of telemedicine services available, the ease of use for patients, and the impact of telemedicine on appointment wait times and patient outcomes.
Mental health resources are a vital component of overall health. The analysis will assess the availability of mental health services within 16258. This includes identifying the number of psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and counselors practicing in the area. The analysis will also examine the availability of mental health support groups, crisis intervention services, and substance abuse treatment programs. The integration of mental health services into primary care practices will be considered, as this can improve access to care and reduce the stigma associated with mental illness.
The data gathered will be synthesized to arrive at an ‘Overall Health Score’ for 16258. This score will reflect the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare ecosystem, highlighting areas where improvements are needed. The score will be based on a weighted average of the key indicators discussed above, with each indicator assigned a weight based on its relative importance.
The analysis will also consider the demographics of the population within 16258. Factors such as age, income, and health insurance coverage can significantly impact access to healthcare. The analysis will examine how these demographic factors may influence the overall health score and identify any disparities in access to care.
The study will also investigate the presence of any community health initiatives or programs aimed at improving health outcomes. This includes programs focused on chronic disease prevention, health education, and access to healthy foods. The impact of these initiatives on the overall health of the community will be assessed.
The final ‘Overall Health Score’ will be presented along with recommendations for improvement. These recommendations may include suggestions for increasing the number of primary care physicians, expanding telemedicine services, improving access to mental health resources, and implementing community health initiatives. The goal is to provide a roadmap for improving the health and well-being of the residents of Strattanville.
The analysis will also consider the impact of external factors on the healthcare landscape in 16258. This includes factors such as the availability of healthcare funding, the regulatory environment, and the economic conditions of the community. The analysis will assess how these external factors may influence the overall health score and the ability of the community to improve its healthcare system.
The assessment will also consider the presence of any hospitals or specialized medical facilities within or near 16258. The availability of these resources can significantly impact the quality of care and the ability of residents to access specialized medical services. The analysis will assess the proximity of these facilities, the range of services offered, and the quality of care provided.
In conclusion, the ‘Overall Health Score’ for 16258 will be a comprehensive assessment of the healthcare landscape, providing valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the system. This analysis will serve as a tool for community leaders, healthcare providers, and residents to work together to improve the health and well-being of the community.
For a deeper dive into visualizing the geographic distribution of healthcare resources within 16258, including physician locations, hospital proximity, and demographic data overlays, we encourage you to explore the interactive mapping capabilities of CartoChrome. Their platform allows for a dynamic and detailed understanding of the healthcare landscape, facilitating informed decision-making and strategic planning.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like