16416, Garland, Pennsylvania Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 16416, Garland, Pennsylvania is 45 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 16416 has some form of health insurance. 59.73 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 71.81 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16416 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 34 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16416. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 68 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 99 health care providers accessible to residents in 16416, Garland, Pennsylvania.

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 16416 and Primary Care Availability in Garland

Evaluating the overall health landscape within ZIP Code 16416, encompassing the town of Garland, necessitates a multi-faceted approach. It requires analyzing the accessibility and quality of primary care physicians, the availability of specialized medical services, and the integration of innovative healthcare solutions. This analysis will culminate in an assessment of the overall health score, considering various factors that contribute to the well-being of the community. The primary care availability, which is the cornerstone of a healthy community, will be the focal point of this analysis.

Physician-to-patient ratios are a crucial indicator of access to care. A high ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potential difficulties in securing timely medical attention. Data on the specific physician-to-patient ratio within 16416 is essential for a complete assessment. National averages and benchmarks should be used to compare and contrast the local situation. If the ratio is unfavorable, it highlights a potential area of concern and the need for initiatives to attract and retain primary care physicians.

Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of care offered by the existing physicians is paramount. This involves assessing the credentials and experience of the doctors practicing in the area. Are they board-certified? Do they have specialized training? What is their patient satisfaction rating? Information on these aspects will help determine the quality of the care available. Patient reviews, if available, provide valuable insights into the patient experience, including communication, responsiveness, and the overall quality of care provided.

Identifying standout practices within the ZIP Code is important. These practices can serve as models for others, demonstrating best practices in patient care, operational efficiency, and the integration of technology. Practices that have invested in modern equipment, offer extended hours, or have adopted innovative patient care models should be highlighted. These practices often provide a higher level of service and contribute to a more positive healthcare experience for the community.

The adoption of telemedicine is another critical factor in the health score analysis. Telemedicine, which is the use of technology to provide healthcare remotely, can significantly improve access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. The availability of telehealth services, such as virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online prescription refills, can enhance convenience and reduce the burden on patients. Practices that have embraced telemedicine should be recognized for their commitment to innovation and patient-centered care.

Mental health resources are an integral part of overall health. The availability of mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and therapists, is essential for addressing the growing mental health needs of the community. The analysis should examine the number of mental health providers in the area, the types of services offered, and the accessibility of these services. Are there adequate resources to address issues like depression, anxiety, and substance abuse? The integration of mental health services into primary care practices is a best practice that should be considered.

The overall health score is a composite measure that considers the factors discussed above. It is not a single number, but rather a nuanced assessment that reflects the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare landscape in 16416. The score should be based on data and evidence, not on subjective opinions. It should also be updated regularly to reflect changes in the healthcare environment.

The analysis should consider the demographic makeup of the community. Factors such as age, income, and ethnicity can influence healthcare needs and access to care. For example, an aging population may have a greater need for geriatric care, while a low-income population may face challenges in affording healthcare services.

The impact of the local hospital or medical center on the overall health score should be evaluated. The availability of specialized services, such as cardiology, oncology, and surgery, can significantly improve the health outcomes of the community. The hospital's reputation, its patient satisfaction ratings, and its commitment to community outreach are all important factors to consider.

Furthermore, the analysis should also consider the availability of preventative care services, such as vaccinations, screenings, and health education programs. Preventative care is essential for maintaining good health and preventing chronic diseases. The presence of these services in the area will positively impact the overall health score.

The level of health insurance coverage within the community is also a crucial factor. Individuals without health insurance often delay or forgo medical care, leading to poorer health outcomes. The analysis should consider the percentage of the population with health insurance and the availability of affordable health insurance options.

The analysis should also consider the presence of community health initiatives and programs. These programs, which can be run by local organizations, hospitals, or government agencies, can improve access to care, promote healthy behaviors, and address health disparities. The effectiveness of these programs should be evaluated.

The overall health score for doctors in ZIP Code 16416 and primary care availability in Garland will likely fall somewhere in the middle range. While there may be dedicated physicians and some adoption of telemedicine, challenges with physician-to-patient ratios and access to specialized services may exist. Further investigation into the specific data points mentioned above is required for a more precise assessment.

The healthcare landscape is constantly evolving, and it is essential to stay informed about the latest trends and developments. Regularly monitoring the availability of doctors, the quality of care, and the adoption of innovative healthcare solutions is crucial for maintaining a healthy community.

To gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in ZIP Code 16416 and the surrounding areas, explore interactive maps and data visualizations. These tools can provide valuable insights into the distribution of healthcare resources, the location of medical facilities, and the demographics of the community.

If you are interested in visualizing this data and gaining a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Garland and surrounding areas, visit CartoChrome maps.