The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 16726, Cyclone, Pennsylvania is 40 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 94.97 percent of the residents in 16726 has some form of health insurance. 54.93 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 60.34 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16726 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 101 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16726. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 90 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 433 health care providers accessible to residents in 16726, Cyclone, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 16726, Cyclone, Pennsylvania
Overall Health Score | 42 |
---|---|
People Score | 65 |
Provider Score | 40 |
Hospital Score | 49 |
Travel Score | 27 |
16726 | Cyclone | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 2,886.41 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 17,032.97 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 17,000.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in 16726 & Primary Care in Cyclone
This analysis provides an overall health score assessment, focusing on two distinct geographic areas: doctors practicing within ZIP Code 16726 (a location that will remain unnamed for the sake of this exercise) and the availability of primary care services within the fictional community of Cyclone. The assessment considers various factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, notable practices, telemedicine integration, and the availability of mental health resources. The goal is to provide a comprehensive overview of healthcare accessibility and quality in these areas.
**16726: A Focused Examination**
Evaluating the health landscape within 16726 begins with understanding the physician-to-patient ratio. Accurate data on this is crucial. A low ratio, indicating a scarcity of physicians relative to the population, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to care, and potential strain on existing healthcare providers. Conversely, a higher ratio might suggest a more readily accessible system, although other factors such as specialization and provider distribution also play a role. Researching the average patient load per physician within 16726 is essential.
Beyond raw numbers, an assessment of standout practices is necessary. This involves identifying medical facilities that are recognized for excellence in patient care, specialized services, or innovative approaches to healthcare delivery. This could include hospitals, clinics, and individual physician offices. Factors to consider include accreditation, patient satisfaction scores, and the range of services offered. Are there practices that specialize in geriatric care, pediatric care, or chronic disease management? The presence of such specialized services significantly impacts the overall health score.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor. The ability to access healthcare services remotely, through video consultations, online portals, and remote monitoring, can greatly improve access, especially for patients in rural or underserved areas, or those with mobility issues. Assessing the extent to which practices in 16726 have embraced telemedicine, including the types of services offered remotely and the ease of access for patients, is crucial. Are virtual appointments readily available? Do practices offer online patient portals for communication and appointment scheduling?
The availability of mental health resources is a significant component of overall health. This includes access to psychiatrists, therapists, counselors, and support groups. A comprehensive assessment must determine the number of mental health providers in the area, the types of services they offer (individual therapy, group therapy, medication management), and the wait times for appointments. Are mental health services integrated into primary care practices? Are there any specialized mental health facilities or programs available?
**Cyclone: Primary Care Accessibility**
Shifting focus to Cyclone, the analysis prioritizes primary care accessibility. This involves evaluating the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) serving the community relative to the population. Are there enough PCPs to meet the healthcare needs of the residents? Analyzing the geographic distribution of PCPs within Cyclone is also important. Are PCPs evenly distributed, or are there areas with limited access?
Identifying any standout primary care practices within Cyclone is crucial. This involves evaluating their services, patient satisfaction, and integration of technology. Do they offer extended hours, same-day appointments, or online patient portals? Do they participate in value-based care models? A practice’s commitment to patient-centered care significantly impacts the overall health score.
Telemedicine integration within primary care practices in Cyclone is a key consideration. Do PCPs offer virtual appointments for routine checkups, follow-up visits, or medication management? The availability of telemedicine can significantly improve access to care, particularly for patients who have difficulty traveling to appointments.
Furthermore, the analysis needs to assess the integration of mental health services within primary care in Cyclone. Do PCPs offer mental health screenings or referrals to mental health specialists? The integration of mental health services into primary care can improve access to mental healthcare and reduce the stigma associated with seeking mental health treatment.
**Comparative Analysis and Conclusion**
Comparing the health scores of 16726 and Cyclone requires a standardized methodology. Each area should be evaluated using the same criteria, allowing for a direct comparison of strengths and weaknesses. The overall health score for each area should be based on a weighted average of the factors discussed above.
The final analysis should provide a clear picture of healthcare accessibility and quality in both 16726 and Cyclone. This includes identifying areas where healthcare is strong and areas where improvements are needed. For example, if 16726 has a low physician-to-patient ratio, this would negatively impact its overall score. Conversely, if Cyclone has strong telemedicine adoption within its primary care practices, this would positively impact its score.
This analysis underscores the complexity of evaluating healthcare access. It requires a multifaceted approach, considering not only the availability of physicians but also the quality of care, the integration of technology, and the availability of mental health resources.
For a visual and interactive exploration of healthcare data, including physician locations, service availability, and demographic information, consider utilizing CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome provides a powerful platform for visualizing and analyzing geographic data, allowing for a deeper understanding of healthcare landscapes.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like