17049, Mc Alisterville, Pennsylvania Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 17049, Mc Alisterville, Pennsylvania is 19 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 75.22 percent of the residents in 17049 has some form of health insurance. 27.79 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 63.70 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17049 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,061 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 8 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17049. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 574 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,480 health care providers accessible to residents in 17049, Mc Alisterville, Pennsylvania.

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Mc Alisterville (ZIP Code 17049)

Evaluating the overall health landscape within the Mc Alisterville, Pennsylvania (ZIP Code 17049) area requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis considers several key factors, including physician availability, the adoption of modern healthcare practices, and the accessibility of vital mental health resources. The goal is to provide a comprehensive 'Overall Health Score' assessment, offering insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare ecosystem.

One of the most critical metrics is the physician-to-patient ratio. This reflects the potential for timely access to primary care physicians, a cornerstone of preventative health. Mc Alisterville, being a rural community, likely faces challenges in this regard. Data from the Pennsylvania Department of Health and national averages suggest a potential shortage of primary care physicians in rural areas. This can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying diagnoses and treatment. The specific physician-to-patient ratio for 17049 would need to be determined by consulting publicly available data from the Pennsylvania Department of Health, the U.S. Census Bureau, and potentially healthcare provider directories.

The presence of standout medical practices significantly impacts the overall health score. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care, utilize advanced technologies, and have a positive reputation within the community contribute positively. Identifying these practices requires a combination of data analysis and community feedback. This would involve reviewing patient reviews, assessing the range of services offered, and examining the qualifications and experience of the physicians. The existence of a well-regarded family practice or internal medicine clinic would be a significant asset.

Telemedicine adoption is another crucial factor. Telemedicine, including virtual consultations and remote monitoring, expands access to care, especially for residents in geographically isolated areas. The extent to which local physicians and practices have embraced telemedicine technologies would be assessed. This includes examining the availability of virtual appointments, the use of remote patient monitoring devices, and the integration of telehealth platforms into the overall care delivery model. A high level of telemedicine adoption would positively impact the health score, reflecting a commitment to providing accessible and convenient healthcare.

Mental health resources are an essential component of overall well-being. The availability of mental health professionals, including psychiatrists, psychologists, and licensed therapists, is critical. The analysis would investigate the presence of mental health providers within the ZIP code or in nearby communities. This includes evaluating the availability of individual therapy, group therapy, and psychiatric services. The existence of mental health support groups, community mental health centers, and partnerships with local schools or social services agencies would also be considered. A robust mental health infrastructure significantly enhances the overall health score.

Furthermore, the analysis considers the availability of specialized healthcare services. The presence of specialists, such as cardiologists, endocrinologists, and dermatologists, within a reasonable distance contributes to the overall health score. The ability to access specialized care locally or within a manageable travel distance is crucial for managing chronic conditions and addressing complex health issues. The availability of these services would be assessed through healthcare provider directories and community resources.

Preventative care initiatives also play a vital role. The analysis would evaluate the availability of services such as routine check-ups, vaccinations, and health screenings. Practices that actively promote preventative care and offer patient education programs would be viewed favorably. The focus on preventative care demonstrates a commitment to promoting long-term health and well-being within the community.

The overall health score for Mc Alisterville (17049) is ultimately a composite measure. It considers the physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and the availability of specialized and preventative care. Each of these factors contributes to a more comprehensive picture of the health landscape.

The score would be based on a weighted system, where each factor is assigned a specific weight based on its relative importance. For instance, the physician-to-patient ratio might carry a higher weight due to its fundamental impact on access to care. The final score would be presented as a numerical value or a rating (e.g., Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor). The score would be accompanied by a detailed explanation of the methodology and the rationale behind the scoring system.

A low score could indicate challenges in accessing primary care, a lack of mental health resources, or limited adoption of modern healthcare practices. Conversely, a high score would reflect a strong healthcare infrastructure, with ample access to physicians, robust mental health support, and a commitment to preventative care.

The analysis would also include recommendations for improvement. These recommendations could include suggestions for increasing the number of primary care physicians, expanding mental health services, promoting telemedicine adoption, and fostering collaboration among healthcare providers. These recommendations would be tailored to the specific needs of the Mc Alisterville community.

This comprehensive assessment provides a valuable snapshot of the healthcare environment in Mc Alisterville (17049). It highlights the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare ecosystem, providing insights that can inform community health initiatives and guide healthcare providers in their efforts to improve patient care. This analysis is not static; it requires ongoing monitoring and updates to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape.

Would you like to visualize this health data, and explore the spatial relationships of healthcare resources in Mc Alisterville and surrounding areas? Consider using CartoChrome maps to gain a visual understanding of the healthcare landscape and identify areas of need.