17056, Mexico, Pennsylvania Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 17056, Mexico, Pennsylvania is 17 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 25.71 percent of the residents in 17056 has some form of health insurance. 11.43 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 14.29 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17056 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 9 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17056. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,610 health care providers accessible to residents in 17056, Mexico, Pennsylvania.

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Comparing Doctor Availability and Healthcare Resources in ZIP Code 17056 and Mexico

This analysis provides an 'Overall Health Score' comparison, contrasting the healthcare landscape within ZIP Code 17056 (Lemoyne, Pennsylvania, USA) and the broader context of primary care availability in Mexico. The assessment considers physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources. Due to the vast differences in data availability and healthcare infrastructure, a direct numerical score comparison is challenging. Instead, this analysis employs a qualitative comparison, highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement in each location.

**ZIP Code 17056 (Lemoyne, Pennsylvania, USA)**

Lemoyne, Pennsylvania, benefits from being situated within a developed healthcare system. However, the specific nuances of healthcare access within this ZIP code require closer examination. Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical indicator of accessibility. While national averages for the US might provide a general benchmark, local data is essential. Ideally, this would involve analyzing the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) and specialists actively practicing within the ZIP code, alongside the population demographics. A higher ratio, indicating more physicians per capita, generally translates to better access. Data from local healthcare providers, county health departments, and state medical boards would be necessary to determine this ratio accurately.

Standout practices within 17056 could include those that have adopted innovative patient care models. This includes practices that prioritize patient-centered care, offer extended hours, or have implemented efficient appointment scheduling systems. Practices utilizing electronic health records (EHRs) and patient portals are also likely to be favored. Researching patient reviews, consulting with local healthcare professionals, and examining quality metrics (if available) are crucial for identifying these standout practices.

Telemedicine adoption in Lemoyne is likely present, reflecting the national trend. The extent of its implementation, however, is crucial. Are local practices offering virtual consultations for routine check-ups, medication refills, and chronic disease management? The availability of telemedicine can significantly improve access, especially for patients with mobility issues, those living in rural areas, or those who find it difficult to travel. Information on telehealth services can be found on the websites of local hospitals, physician practices, and insurance providers.

Mental health resources are a critical aspect of overall health. The analysis needs to assess the availability of mental health professionals, including psychiatrists, psychologists, and licensed therapists, within or near the ZIP code. This would involve investigating the number of mental health providers, the types of services offered (individual therapy, group therapy, medication management), and the accessibility of these services (waiting times, insurance acceptance). Additionally, the presence of community mental health centers, support groups, and crisis intervention services needs to be considered.

**Primary Care Availability in Mexico**

The healthcare landscape in Mexico presents a significantly different scenario compared to the US. Primary care availability varies considerably based on geographic location, socioeconomic factors, and the type of healthcare system accessed (public vs. private). Physician-to-patient ratios in Mexico are generally lower than those in the US, particularly in rural areas. This can result in longer wait times for appointments and limited access to care. Reliable data on physician density across different regions of Mexico is essential for a comprehensive analysis. This data would come from the Mexican Ministry of Health and other relevant government agencies.

Standout practices in Mexico may be those that prioritize patient-centered care, particularly in the private sector. These practices might offer more personalized services, shorter wait times, and access to advanced medical technologies. However, access to these practices is often limited to those with private health insurance or the financial means to pay out-of-pocket.

Telemedicine adoption in Mexico is growing, but its penetration is uneven. It is more prevalent in urban areas and among private healthcare providers. Telemedicine can be a crucial tool for improving access to care in remote regions, where access to specialists is often limited. The availability of internet access and technological infrastructure is a major factor influencing the adoption of telemedicine.

Mental health resources in Mexico are often under-resourced compared to the US. Stigma surrounding mental illness and limited access to mental health professionals are significant challenges. Public mental health services may be overburdened, leading to long waiting lists and limited access to specialized care. The availability of private mental health services is often limited to those with financial resources. Data on the number of mental health professionals, the types of services offered, and the accessibility of these services is crucial for evaluating the mental health landscape.

**Comparative Analysis and Conclusion**

Comparing the two scenarios, 17056 likely benefits from a more developed healthcare infrastructure, including a higher physician-to-patient ratio, greater telemedicine adoption, and more readily available mental health resources, compared to the average situation in Mexico. However, the quality of care within 17056 can vary, and access disparities may exist. Mexico, while facing significant challenges in primary care availability, is actively working to improve its healthcare system. Telemedicine and other innovative solutions are being explored to address access issues.

To gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in both locations, and to visualize the data presented, consider exploring the interactive mapping capabilities of CartoChrome maps. These maps can provide a visual representation of physician density, healthcare facility locations, and other relevant data points, allowing for a more comprehensive and insightful analysis.