The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 17861, Paxtonville, Pennsylvania is 41 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 17861 has some form of health insurance. 28.38 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 81.98 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17861 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 61 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17861. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 28 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,091 health care providers accessible to residents in 17861, Paxtonville, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 17861, Paxtonville, Pennsylvania
| Overall Health Score | 88 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 97 |
| Provider Score | 41 |
| Hospital Score | 79 |
| Travel Score | 38 |
| 17861 | Paxtonville | Pennsylvania | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 21,666.67 | 2,371,846.85 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 78,524.59 | 8,582,622.95 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 169,285.71 | 18,324,285.71 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Paxtonville (17861)
Evaluating the overall health landscape within Paxtonville, Pennsylvania (ZIP code 17861), requires a nuanced understanding of available resources, physician accessibility, and the integration of modern healthcare practices. This analysis aims to provide an 'Overall Health Score' assessment, considering key factors like physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption rates, and the availability of mental health resources.
The foundation of any health assessment lies in the availability of primary care physicians. The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator of access. Unfortunately, rural areas often face challenges in attracting and retaining medical professionals. Data analysis suggests that the ratio in 17861 may be less favorable than the national average, potentially indicating a shortage of primary care doctors relative to the population size. This shortage could lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced preventative care opportunities, and ultimately, poorer health outcomes.
The geographic distribution of primary care providers is another important consideration. Even if the overall physician-to-patient ratio appears acceptable, the physical distance patients must travel to access care can significantly impact their ability to receive timely medical attention. Analyzing the proximity of residents to the nearest primary care practices, considering factors like transportation infrastructure and accessibility for individuals with disabilities, is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of healthcare access in Paxtonville.
Identifying standout practices within the ZIP code is essential. These practices often serve as models for quality care and innovative service delivery. Analyzing patient reviews, assessing the range of services offered (e.g., chronic disease management, preventative screenings), and evaluating the adoption of patient-centered care models can help identify practices that excel in patient satisfaction and health outcomes. These practices can serve as benchmarks for other providers in the area.
Telemedicine adoption represents a significant opportunity to improve healthcare access, particularly in rural areas. The ability to consult with a physician remotely can overcome geographical barriers, reduce travel time, and provide convenient access to care for patients with mobility limitations or those living in remote locations. Evaluating the extent to which primary care practices in 17861 have embraced telemedicine, including the types of services offered (e.g., virtual consultations, remote monitoring), and the patient satisfaction with these services, is crucial.
Mental health resources are an integral component of overall health. The availability of mental health professionals, including psychiatrists, psychologists, and therapists, is a critical factor in assessing the health landscape. Analyzing the number of mental health providers in the area, the types of services offered (e.g., individual therapy, group therapy, medication management), and the accessibility of these services (e.g., insurance acceptance, sliding scale fees) is essential. The integration of mental health services within primary care practices, such as co-located mental health professionals, can also significantly improve access to care and reduce the stigma associated with seeking mental health treatment.
Furthermore, the presence of support services, such as community health centers, social service agencies, and patient advocacy groups, can contribute to the overall health and well-being of the community. These organizations often provide vital resources, such as health education programs, assistance with accessing healthcare services, and support for individuals facing social or economic challenges that impact their health. Assessing the availability and accessibility of these support services is an important component of the overall health score.
The quality of care provided by local hospitals and specialty clinics also influences the overall health score. Access to specialized medical services, such as cardiology, oncology, and surgery, is crucial for addressing complex health conditions. Evaluating the quality of care provided by these facilities, considering factors like patient outcomes, accreditation status, and the availability of advanced medical technologies, is essential.
The integration of technology in healthcare is another area to consider. Electronic health records (EHRs) can improve care coordination, reduce medical errors, and enhance patient communication. Assessing the adoption of EHRs by primary care practices and other healthcare providers in 17861 is important. The use of patient portals, which allow patients to access their medical records, schedule appointments, and communicate with their providers, can also improve patient engagement and satisfaction.
Public health initiatives and community health programs can also play a significant role in improving the overall health of a community. Analyzing the presence of public health programs, such as vaccination campaigns, health screenings, and health education programs, is essential. The involvement of local organizations and community leaders in promoting health and wellness can also contribute to a healthier community.
In conclusion, assessing the overall health score for Paxtonville (17861) involves a multifaceted evaluation. While a definitive numerical score requires comprehensive data analysis, the key factors discussed – physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and the availability of support services – provide a framework for understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare landscape in this rural Pennsylvania community. The challenges of physician access and the potential benefits of telemedicine and mental health integration must be carefully considered.
To visualize the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, identify areas with limited access, and analyze the proximity of residents to healthcare providers, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. These maps offer a powerful tool for understanding the spatial dynamics of healthcare access and can provide valuable insights for improving health outcomes in Paxtonville.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like