17965, Port Carbon, Pennsylvania Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 17965, Port Carbon, Pennsylvania is 37 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 93.96 percent of the residents in 17965 has some form of health insurance. 42.31 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 70.86 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17965 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 364 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17965. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 401 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,272 health care providers accessible to residents in 17965, Port Carbon, Pennsylvania.

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Port Carbon, PA (ZIP Code 17965)

Analyzing the overall health landscape of Port Carbon, Pennsylvania, within the 17965 ZIP code, requires a multifaceted approach. It's crucial to examine not just the raw number of physicians but also the quality of care, accessibility, and the availability of crucial support services. This analysis will delve into physician-to-patient ratios, highlight standout practices, assess telemedicine adoption, and evaluate the presence of mental health resources, ultimately providing an "Overall Health Score" assessment.

Physician-to-patient ratios are a fundamental indicator of access to care. A low ratio, meaning a higher number of patients per physician, can lead to longer wait times, reduced appointment availability, and potentially, less personalized care. Determining the exact ratio in Port Carbon requires accessing up-to-date data from sources like the Pennsylvania Department of Health or the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). A preliminary assessment would likely reveal a ratio that is at least close to the national average, but potentially higher, given the rural nature of the area. This suggests that while access might be available, it could be strained, especially for specialized care.

Standout practices within Port Carbon would be those that demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care, incorporate innovative technologies, and achieve positive health outcomes. Identifying these practices necessitates research into patient reviews, physician ratings, and the services offered. Key factors to consider include the availability of same-day appointments, extended hours, and a comprehensive range of services, such as preventative care, chronic disease management, and specialist referrals. Practices that actively participate in community outreach programs and prioritize patient education would also be considered highly. Specific names are impossible without access to proprietary data.

Telemedicine adoption is a critical factor in modern healthcare. It can improve access to care, particularly for individuals in rural areas with limited mobility or transportation challenges. Assessing telemedicine adoption requires determining which practices in Port Carbon offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient portals. The level of adoption will influence the overall health score. Practices that have embraced telemedicine can provide more convenient and accessible care, potentially improving patient outcomes. The ease of use and the availability of technical support for patients are also important considerations.

Mental health resources are an essential component of overall health. The availability of psychiatrists, therapists, counselors, and support groups directly impacts the well-being of the community. Assessing mental health resources involves identifying the number of mental health professionals practicing in the area, the types of services offered (e.g., individual therapy, group therapy, medication management), and the accessibility of these services. Factors such as insurance acceptance, waiting times for appointments, and the availability of crisis intervention services are also important. A limited supply of mental health resources would negatively impact the overall health score.

Evaluating the overall health score for Port Carbon requires synthesizing all these factors. A weighted approach, giving more importance to factors that directly impact patient access and outcomes, is necessary. For example, a high physician-to-patient ratio, limited telemedicine adoption, and a scarcity of mental health resources would significantly lower the score. Conversely, a low physician-to-patient ratio, widespread telemedicine adoption, and a robust network of mental health providers would elevate the score. The final score would be a subjective assessment based on the available data.

The rural nature of Port Carbon can present unique challenges to healthcare delivery. Transportation limitations, socioeconomic factors, and the potential for a higher proportion of elderly residents can all impact access to care. Addressing these challenges requires a collaborative approach involving healthcare providers, community organizations, and local government. This might involve initiatives such as mobile health clinics, transportation assistance programs, and community health education campaigns.

Further research is needed to provide a more precise and detailed analysis. This includes accessing data on physician demographics, insurance coverage rates, chronic disease prevalence, and patient satisfaction scores. The insights gained from this research would inform the development of targeted interventions to improve the health and well-being of the residents of Port Carbon.

The overall health score is not static; it is a dynamic measure that can change over time. Regular assessments and monitoring are essential to track progress, identify areas for improvement, and ensure that healthcare services are meeting the needs of the community. The development of a comprehensive health plan, based on the findings of this analysis, would be a crucial step in improving the health and well-being of the residents of Port Carbon. This plan should address the identified challenges and prioritize initiatives that will enhance access to care, improve health outcomes, and promote a healthier community.

The analysis of healthcare availability in Port Carbon requires a deep dive into complex data. The final score would be a reflection of the interplay between all these factors. The goal is to provide a snapshot of the health landscape, highlighting both strengths and weaknesses. The intent is to inform decision-making and drive positive change within the community. The ultimate aim is to improve the health and well-being of the residents of Port Carbon.

To visualize the healthcare landscape of Port Carbon and surrounding areas with detailed mapping and data overlays, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. Their platform allows for the integration of various datasets, providing a comprehensive view of physician locations, healthcare facilities, and demographic information. This can aid in identifying underserved areas and informing strategic planning for healthcare resource allocation.