18065, Neffs, Pennsylvania Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 18065, Neffs, Pennsylvania is 0 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 97.84 percent of the residents in 18065 has some form of health insurance. 80.95 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 46.75 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 18065 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 23 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 50 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 18065. An estimate of 106 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 172 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 47,349 health care providers accessible to residents in 18065, Neffs, Pennsylvania.

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 18065 & Primary Care Availability in Neffs

Analyzing the overall health landscape within ZIP code 18065, encompassing the area of Neffs, Pennsylvania, requires a multifaceted approach. We must delve into the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs), assess the physician-to-patient ratio, examine the presence and integration of telemedicine, evaluate mental health resources, and identify any standout practices that contribute positively to the community's well-being. This comprehensive analysis aims to provide an 'Overall Health Score' reflecting the accessibility, quality, and comprehensiveness of healthcare services in Neffs.

The cornerstone of a healthy community lies in readily accessible primary care. In Neffs, determining the exact number of practicing PCPs is crucial. This includes family medicine doctors, general practitioners, and internal medicine specialists. The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical metric. A higher ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potentially poorer health outcomes. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests greater accessibility. Researching the precise ratio for 18065 is the first step. This requires data from local hospitals, insurance providers, and state medical boards.

Furthermore, the geographical distribution of these physicians within the ZIP code is vital. Are the PCPs concentrated in a specific area, potentially leaving residents in other parts of Neffs with limited options? Are there any underserved pockets that lack adequate access to primary care? Analyzing this spatial distribution is essential to understanding the true accessibility of healthcare. This can be achieved by mapping the locations of PCP offices and overlaying them with population density data.

Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of care is paramount. Researching the reputation of individual practices and physicians is essential. Online reviews, patient testimonials, and ratings from organizations like the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) can provide valuable insights into patient satisfaction, the quality of care provided, and the overall patient experience. Identifying practices with consistently high ratings and positive feedback is crucial. These standout practices often serve as models for other providers in the area.

The adoption of telemedicine is another critical factor in assessing the overall health score. Telemedicine, including virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient portals, can significantly improve access to care, particularly for those with mobility issues, transportation challenges, or those living in geographically isolated areas. Determining the extent of telemedicine adoption among PCPs in 18065 is crucial. Do practices offer virtual appointments? Do they utilize patient portals for communication and appointment scheduling? The more integrated telemedicine is, the higher the potential score.

Mental health resources are an integral part of overall health. Assessing the availability of mental health services within the ZIP code is essential. This includes identifying psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and counselors. Are these mental health professionals readily accessible? Are there any barriers to accessing mental health services, such as long wait times, high costs, or a lack of insurance coverage? Integrating mental health services into primary care practices, through co-located clinics or referral networks, can significantly improve access to mental healthcare.

The integration of behavioral health services within the primary care setting is a crucial aspect of a high 'Overall Health Score.' This integrated approach allows for early identification and management of mental health concerns, improving patient outcomes and reducing the stigma associated with mental illness. Assessing whether primary care practices in 18065 have implemented such integrated models is essential.

Additionally, understanding the prevalence of chronic diseases within the community is important. Data on diabetes, heart disease, and other chronic conditions can help assess the need for preventative care and disease management programs. Are there any specific programs or initiatives in place to address these prevalent health concerns? The presence of such programs would positively impact the overall health score.

The presence of specialized clinics or services, such as women's health centers, geriatric care facilities, or pediatric specialists, can also contribute to a higher score. These specialized services cater to specific populations and address unique healthcare needs. The availability of these specialized services within or near 18065 indicates a more comprehensive healthcare ecosystem.

To compile a comprehensive 'Overall Health Score,' each of these factors would need to be weighted and quantified. The physician-to-patient ratio, telemedicine adoption, mental health resource availability, and patient satisfaction scores would all contribute to the final score. The weighting of each factor would depend on its relative importance in determining the overall health of the community.

For instance, a community with a low physician-to-patient ratio, limited telemedicine adoption, and a scarcity of mental health resources would likely receive a lower score. Conversely, a community with a favorable physician-to-patient ratio, robust telemedicine infrastructure, and readily accessible mental health services would likely receive a higher score.

The 'Overall Health Score' is not just a static number; it's a dynamic assessment that should be regularly updated. Healthcare landscapes are constantly evolving, with new technologies, treatment options, and community needs emerging. Regular reassessment is crucial to track progress, identify areas for improvement, and ensure that healthcare services are meeting the needs of the community.

The analysis of doctors in ZIP code 18065 and primary care availability in Neffs reveals a complex picture. Determining the exact score requires gathering and analyzing specific data points. The factors discussed, including physician-to-patient ratios, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources, are crucial components of a comprehensive assessment.

To further explore the healthcare landscape in Neffs and surrounding areas, including the geographical distribution of healthcare providers and other relevant data, consider utilizing CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome provides interactive visualizations and data analysis tools that can help you gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare environment in your community.