The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 18237, Mcadoo, Pennsylvania is 50 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 89.93 percent of the residents in 18237 has some form of health insurance. 47.21 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 58.67 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 18237 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,146 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 18237. An estimate of 4 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 532 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,620 health care providers accessible to residents in 18237, Mcadoo, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 18237, Mcadoo, Pennsylvania
Overall Health Score | 47 |
---|---|
People Score | 26 |
Provider Score | 50 |
Hospital Score | 53 |
Travel Score | 59 |
18237 | Mcadoo | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 1,884.55 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 6,961.65 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 13,289.47 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 18237 and Primary Care Availability in McAdoo
Evaluating the overall health landscape within ZIP code 18237, encompassing McAdoo, Pennsylvania, requires a multifaceted approach. It necessitates assessing the accessibility, quality, and comprehensiveness of healthcare services, particularly focusing on primary care availability. This analysis will delve into physician-to-patient ratios, notable practices, the integration of telemedicine, and the presence of mental health resources, ultimately providing an "Overall Health Score" assessment.
The initial challenge lies in determining the physician-to-patient ratio. Accurate data requires access to up-to-date information on the number of practicing physicians, particularly primary care physicians (PCPs), within the specified ZIP code, and the current population of the area. Publicly available data from sources like the US Census Bureau and the Pennsylvania Department of Health provides population figures, while physician directories and professional organizations can offer physician counts. However, these sources may not always be perfectly synchronized. A low physician-to-patient ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, raises concerns about access to care, potentially leading to longer wait times for appointments and increased strain on existing healthcare providers. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests greater accessibility.
Identifying standout practices within 18237 is crucial. This involves researching practices that demonstrate excellence in patient care, incorporate innovative technologies, and offer a broad range of services. Factors to consider include patient reviews, accreditations from reputable organizations, the range of specializations offered (beyond primary care), and the adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) for improved efficiency and patient data management. Practices with a strong emphasis on preventative care, chronic disease management, and patient education typically score higher. The presence of extended hours, weekend availability, and multilingual staff also contribute positively to the overall assessment.
Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important in evaluating healthcare accessibility. The ability to offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient portals can significantly improve access to care, especially for individuals with mobility issues, those living in rural areas, or those seeking convenient follow-up appointments. Practices that have embraced telemedicine technologies, providing patients with options for virtual visits and remote monitoring, are considered more forward-thinking and patient-centric. The availability of these technologies can significantly improve the overall health score.
Mental health resources are a critical component of overall well-being, and their availability significantly impacts the health score. This includes the presence of psychiatrists, psychologists, licensed therapists, and mental health clinics within the area. Access to mental health services is often a significant challenge, particularly in rural communities. The availability of support groups, crisis intervention services, and partnerships with local mental health organizations can enhance the overall score. The integration of mental health services within primary care practices, allowing for a more holistic approach to patient care, is also a positive indicator.
Analyzing primary care availability specifically within McAdoo requires a localized focus. This includes identifying the number of PCPs practicing within the borough and assessing their capacity to serve the local population. Factors to consider include the age and demographics of the population, the prevalence of chronic diseases, and the availability of support services for vulnerable populations. The presence of community health centers and federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) can significantly improve access to care for underserved populations.
The "Overall Health Score" for 18237 and McAdoo is a composite of these factors. A high score would reflect a favorable physician-to-patient ratio, standout practices demonstrating excellence, widespread telemedicine adoption, and robust mental health resources. Conversely, a low score would indicate challenges in access to care, limited resources, and potential gaps in service delivery. This score is not a static number but rather a dynamic assessment that should be regularly updated to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape.
The assessment should also consider the socioeconomic factors impacting health outcomes. Poverty, lack of access to transportation, and limited health literacy can all negatively impact the overall health score. Addressing these social determinants of health is crucial for improving the well-being of the community. Collaboration between healthcare providers, social service agencies, and community organizations is essential to address these challenges.
Regularly updating the assessment is important, as the healthcare landscape is constantly evolving. New practices may open, existing practices may adopt new technologies, and the availability of resources may change. This requires ongoing monitoring and data collection. The data used should be verified and cross-referenced to ensure accuracy.
In conclusion, the "Overall Health Score" for doctors in ZIP code 18237 and primary care availability in McAdoo is a complex assessment that considers various factors. While a precise numerical score requires detailed data analysis, this analysis provides a framework for evaluating the healthcare landscape. The availability of primary care physicians, the quality of practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the presence of mental health resources are all essential components. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system is the first step toward improving the health and well-being of the community.
To gain a more comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape in McAdoo and the surrounding areas, and to visualize the data, consider exploring the interactive mapping capabilities offered by CartoChrome maps. Their platform can provide valuable insights into healthcare access and resource distribution.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like