The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 18851, Warren Center, Pennsylvania is 73 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 94.75 percent of the residents in 18851 has some form of health insurance. 42.30 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 74.10 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 18851 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 135 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 4 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 18851. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 158 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,812 health care providers accessible to residents in 18851, Warren Center, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 18851, Warren Center, Pennsylvania
Overall Health Score | 61 |
---|---|
People Score | 58 |
Provider Score | 73 |
Hospital Score | 42 |
Travel Score | 34 |
18851 | Warren Center | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 10,885.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 53,040.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 41,645.57 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Warren Center, PA (ZIP Code 18851)
Analyzing the overall health landscape in Warren Center, Pennsylvania (ZIP code 18851) requires a multi-faceted approach. We need to consider not just the presence of physicians, but also the accessibility of primary care, the availability of specialized services, and the integration of modern healthcare solutions. This analysis will provide an ‘Overall Health Score’ based on these key factors.
The foundation of a healthy community is strong primary care. In Warren Center, the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) is a critical element. Assessing the physician-to-patient ratio is the first step. National averages provide a benchmark, but rural areas often face challenges. A lower physician-to-patient ratio, meaning more patients per physician, indicates potential difficulties in accessing timely appointments and comprehensive care. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests better access. This analysis must determine the actual ratio within 18851, considering both the number of practicing PCPs and the estimated population.
Beyond the raw numbers, the distribution of PCPs matters. Are they clustered in one area, or are they geographically dispersed, serving different segments of the community? This distribution impacts access for those with limited transportation options or residing in more remote locations. Furthermore, the types of practices available are important. Are there solo practitioners, small group practices, or larger, more integrated healthcare systems? Each model offers different strengths and weaknesses in terms of service offerings, appointment availability, and the ability to coordinate care.
Identifying standout practices within the ZIP code is essential. These practices might excel in patient satisfaction, preventative care, or chronic disease management. Their success stories can offer valuable insights into best practices for the entire community. Are there practices known for their patient-centered approach, their commitment to preventative screenings, or their success in managing conditions like diabetes or heart disease? Researching patient reviews, practice websites, and local healthcare directories can help identify these exemplary providers.
Telemedicine is reshaping healthcare delivery, particularly in rural areas. Its adoption in Warren Center is a significant indicator of the community's health score. Does the local healthcare infrastructure support telemedicine consultations? Are PCPs offering virtual appointments for routine check-ups, medication refills, and follow-up care? The availability of telemedicine can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility limitations or those living in geographically isolated areas. Examining the presence of telehealth platforms, the types of services offered virtually, and the ease of access to these services will be crucial.
Mental health resources are a vital component of overall well-being. The analysis must assess the availability of mental health services within and around 18851. Are there psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and counselors accessible to residents? Are these services covered by local insurance plans? The presence of mental health support groups, crisis hotlines, and community outreach programs also contributes to a positive health score. Understanding the accessibility of mental health services is critical, as mental health issues often go unaddressed in rural areas due to a lack of resources or stigma.
Another factor to consider is the presence of specialized care. While primary care forms the backbone of healthcare, access to specialists is also important. Are there specialists in areas such as cardiology, dermatology, or gastroenterology within a reasonable distance? The availability of specialists influences the ability of patients to receive prompt and appropriate care for specific medical conditions. Proximity to hospitals and urgent care facilities also impacts the overall health score. The presence of emergency services and the ability to handle urgent medical needs are essential for community well-being.
The integration of technology beyond telemedicine is also important. Does the healthcare system utilize electronic health records (EHRs) to improve care coordination? Are patients able to access their medical records online and communicate with their providers electronically? The use of technology can streamline administrative processes, improve communication, and empower patients to take a more active role in their health.
Finally, the analysis must consider the socio-economic factors that influence health outcomes. Poverty, lack of access to healthy food, and limited educational opportunities can all negatively impact health. Understanding the demographics of Warren Center and the social determinants of health is essential for a comprehensive assessment.
Synthesizing all these factors – physician-to-patient ratios, the distribution of PCPs, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, the presence of specialized care, the use of technology, and the socio-economic landscape – will allow for the determination of an ‘Overall Health Score’ for Warren Center (18851). This score will reflect the community's strengths and weaknesses in terms of healthcare access, quality, and overall well-being. The score will then be weighted based on the relative importance of each factor, with primary care access and mental health resources given significant weight.
The final ‘Overall Health Score’ will provide a valuable snapshot of the healthcare landscape in Warren Center. It will highlight areas where the community excels and identify areas that require improvement. This information can be used by healthcare providers, policymakers, and community members to develop strategies for improving healthcare access and quality, ultimately leading to a healthier community.
For a detailed visual representation of this data, including the geographic distribution of healthcare providers, access to services, and other relevant factors, explore CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome offers interactive maps that can provide a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Warren Center and beyond.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like