02828, Greenville, Rhode Island Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 02828, Greenville, Rhode Island is 86 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 93.77 percent of the residents in 02828 has some form of health insurance. 36.41 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 80.06 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 02828 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,145 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 02828. An estimate of 5 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,212 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,997 health care providers accessible to residents in 02828, Greenville, Rhode Island.

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Greenville, RI (ZIP Code 02828)

Analyzing the overall health landscape within Greenville, Rhode Island (ZIP code 02828) requires a multi-faceted approach, considering factors beyond just the presence of doctors. This analysis aims to provide a comprehensive "Overall Health Score," encompassing physician availability, healthcare quality, access to mental health services, and the adoption of modern healthcare practices. The score, while not a numerical value, will be a qualitative assessment of the strengths and weaknesses within the specified geographical area.

**Physician-to-Patient Ratios and Primary Care Availability:**

A critical indicator of community health is the physician-to-patient ratio. While specific, granular data for 02828 alone may be challenging to obtain without proprietary data, we can leverage publicly available information and regional averages to estimate this. Rhode Island, in general, faces challenges in primary care physician availability. If Greenville mirrors this trend, residents might encounter difficulties securing timely appointments, particularly for new patients. This can lead to delayed diagnoses and preventative care, ultimately impacting the overall health score negatively. The presence of a large, well-staffed primary care practice would significantly improve this aspect of the score. Conversely, a shortage of primary care physicians, especially family medicine practitioners, would be a significant detriment.

**Standout Practices and Healthcare Quality:**

The quality of care provided by existing medical practices is paramount. Identifying "standout practices" involves evaluating factors such as patient satisfaction, clinical outcomes, and the utilization of evidence-based medicine. Hospitals and larger medical groups often have patient satisfaction surveys and publicly available data. Practices that consistently score high in these areas, demonstrating a commitment to patient-centered care and positive health outcomes, will contribute positively to the overall health score. The presence of specialists, such as cardiologists, endocrinologists, and gastroenterologists, within or near the ZIP code would also boost the score, providing residents with convenient access to specialized medical expertise. Conversely, practices with poor reputations, high patient complaint rates, or a lack of specialized services would detract from the score.

**Telemedicine Adoption and Technological Advancements:**

The adoption of telemedicine and other technological advancements is a crucial element in assessing healthcare accessibility and efficiency. Practices embracing telehealth, offering virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient portals, are demonstrating a commitment to patient convenience and proactive care. Telemedicine can be particularly beneficial for residents in rural areas or those with mobility limitations, improving access to care and reducing travel burdens. Practices that lag behind in this area, relying solely on traditional in-person appointments, would negatively impact the score. The availability of electronic health records (EHRs) and the ability to share medical information seamlessly between providers are also essential components of a modern healthcare system.

**Mental Health Resources and Support:**

Mental health is an integral part of overall health. The availability of mental health resources, including psychiatrists, therapists, counselors, and support groups, is a critical factor in determining the overall health score. A community with readily accessible mental health services will demonstrate a higher score. The presence of mental health clinics, partnerships with local schools and community organizations, and the integration of mental healthcare into primary care settings are all positive indicators. Conversely, a lack of mental health providers, long wait times for appointments, and limited access to support services would significantly lower the score. The stigma surrounding mental health can also be a barrier to care, and communities that actively work to reduce this stigma will see improved health outcomes.

**Specific Considerations for Greenville (02828):**

To refine the analysis, we need to consider specific characteristics of Greenville. This includes the demographics of the population, the socioeconomic factors affecting residents, and the presence of any unique health challenges. For example, if a significant portion of the population is elderly, the availability of geriatric specialists and home healthcare services would be particularly important. If the community has a high rate of chronic diseases, the availability of specialized care and disease management programs would be crucial. The presence of community health centers or free clinics would also be a positive factor, especially for underserved populations.

**Conclusion:**

The overall health score for Greenville (02828) is a dynamic assessment. While specific data points are difficult to obtain without direct access to local healthcare provider information, the framework outlined here provides a basis for evaluation. The score is likely to be affected by the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of care provided by local practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. A community that prioritizes access to care, patient satisfaction, technological innovation, and mental well-being will likely achieve a higher overall health score. To gain a more comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape in Greenville and visualize the distribution of healthcare resources, consider exploring the interactive mapping capabilities offered by CartoChrome.