The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 29138, Saluda, South Carolina is 17 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 74.37 percent of the residents in 29138 has some form of health insurance. 42.43 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 41.55 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 29138 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 2,846 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 29138. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,669 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 238 health care providers accessible to residents in 29138, Saluda, South Carolina.
Health Scores in 29138, Saluda, South Carolina
Overall Health Score | 4 |
---|---|
People Score | 13 |
Provider Score | 17 |
Hospital Score | 41 |
Travel Score | 25 |
29138 | Saluda | South Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 57.16 | 15,605.85 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 230.45 | 62,602.95 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 338.70 | 90,177.68 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Saluda, SC (ZIP Code 29138)
This analysis assesses the overall health landscape within ZIP code 29138, focusing on physician availability, primary care accessibility, and related healthcare resources. The goal is to provide a comprehensive "Overall Health Score" based on available data and observable trends. The assessment considers factors impacting the health and well-being of the Saluda community.
The foundation of a healthy community rests on access to qualified medical professionals. Physician-to-patient ratios serve as a crucial metric. In Saluda, the ratio, while not definitively quantified in readily available public datasets, appears to be a concern. The rural nature of the area, coupled with potential physician shortages, likely results in a ratio that may not meet recommended standards. This can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delayed diagnoses, and increased pressure on existing healthcare providers.
Primary care availability is inextricably linked to overall health. Examining the number of family medicine practices, internal medicine specialists, and general practitioners within the 29138 ZIP code is paramount. Beyond the raw numbers, the ability to secure timely appointments is critical. Are there sufficient options for routine check-ups, preventative care, and management of chronic conditions? The presence of after-hours clinics or urgent care facilities also contributes significantly to accessibility, particularly for individuals with limited transportation options or those experiencing urgent medical needs outside of regular business hours.
Identifying standout practices within the community is essential. This involves evaluating factors such as patient satisfaction, the range of services offered, and the integration of technology. Practices that have embraced electronic health records (EHRs) and patient portals demonstrate a commitment to efficiency and patient engagement. Those offering specialized services, such as chronic disease management programs or preventative screenings, further enhance their value to the community. Assessing the quality of care necessitates examining patient reviews, publicly available performance data (if any), and the overall reputation of the practice within the local community.
Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important, especially in rural areas. The ability to access healthcare remotely can overcome geographical barriers and improve access to specialists. Practices that offer telehealth consultations, virtual monitoring programs, or online patient portals demonstrate a forward-thinking approach to healthcare delivery. This is particularly crucial for patients with mobility limitations, those living in remote areas, or those seeking follow-up appointments without the need for an in-person visit. The availability of telehealth services can significantly impact the overall health score by expanding access to care.
Mental health resources are an integral component of overall well-being. The assessment considers the availability of mental health professionals, including psychiatrists, psychologists, and licensed therapists, within the 29138 ZIP code and the surrounding areas. The presence of community mental health centers, support groups, and addiction treatment services is also vital. Furthermore, the integration of mental healthcare into primary care settings, such as the availability of behavioral health specialists within family medicine practices, can improve access and reduce the stigma associated with mental health treatment.
The Overall Health Score for Saluda (29138) is, therefore, influenced by a complex interplay of factors. The apparent physician-to-patient ratio, the availability of primary care services, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the accessibility of mental health resources all contribute to the final score. While specific numerical scores are challenging to calculate without access to comprehensive, real-time data, the analysis suggests areas for potential improvement. Addressing physician shortages, enhancing primary care accessibility, promoting telemedicine adoption, and strengthening mental health resources are critical steps toward improving the overall health and well-being of the Saluda community.
The limitations of this analysis must be acknowledged. The lack of readily available, granular data on physician-to-patient ratios, specific practice performance metrics, and detailed information on mental health resources restricts the precision of the assessment. The analysis relies on publicly available information, general observations, and the understanding of healthcare trends in rural communities. A more in-depth analysis would require access to comprehensive datasets and direct engagement with local healthcare providers and community stakeholders.
The Overall Health Score is not a static measure. It is subject to change based on evolving healthcare trends, community initiatives, and the availability of resources. Continuous monitoring and evaluation are essential to track progress and identify areas requiring further attention. The community must actively participate in promoting health and wellness, advocating for improved healthcare access, and supporting initiatives that address the unique health needs of the population.
The current landscape suggests that Saluda, like many rural communities, faces challenges in ensuring optimal healthcare access. While the community likely has dedicated healthcare professionals and resources, addressing physician shortages, expanding primary care options, and promoting telemedicine adoption are crucial steps toward improving the Overall Health Score. The integration of mental healthcare into primary care and the strengthening of community mental health services are also vital components of a comprehensive approach to health and well-being.
To gain a more visual and data-driven understanding of the healthcare landscape in Saluda and surrounding areas, consider exploring the power of spatial data. CartoChrome maps can provide invaluable insights into physician locations, healthcare facility distribution, and demographic data related to health outcomes.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like