The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 29163, Vance, South Carolina is 6 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 86.82 percent of the residents in 29163 has some form of health insurance. 59.89 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 33.21 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 29163 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 481 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 29163. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 294 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 37 health care providers accessible to residents in 29163, Vance, South Carolina.
Health Scores in 29163, Vance, South Carolina
| Overall Health Score | 2 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 22 |
| Provider Score | 6 |
| Hospital Score | 33 |
| Travel Score | 16 |
| 29163 | Vance | South Carolina | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 149.25 | 108,407.96 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 498.96 | 360,582.12 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 782.31 | 578,809.52 | 0.00 |
The health landscape within ZIP Code 29163, encompassing the town of Vance, South Carolina, presents a complex picture. Evaluating the "Overall Health Score" necessitates a deep dive into several interconnected factors, including physician availability, the quality of care provided, the adoption of innovative healthcare models, and the accessibility of essential mental health services. This analysis aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the health resources available to residents of Vance, offering insights into strengths, weaknesses, and areas ripe for improvement.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical indicator of healthcare access. In Vance, the ratio likely fluctuates, impacted by the rural nature of the area and potential commuting patterns to larger towns or cities. A low physician-to-patient ratio, indicating a shortage of doctors, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and ultimately, poorer health outcomes. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests a greater availability of medical professionals. However, simply counting doctors doesn't tell the whole story. The specialties of those physicians are also important. Are there enough primary care physicians (PCPs) to serve the population? Are there specialists readily available for conditions like cardiology, dermatology, or gastroenterology? Data on these specific metrics is crucial for a complete health score assessment.
Primary care availability is the cornerstone of a robust healthcare system. It serves as the first point of contact for most health concerns and plays a vital role in preventative care, chronic disease management, and overall wellness. In Vance, assessing primary care availability involves identifying the number of PCPs practicing within the ZIP Code and evaluating their capacity to see new patients. Factors like insurance acceptance, appointment scheduling practices, and the presence of extended hours or weekend availability contribute to the overall accessibility of primary care. Furthermore, the integration of primary care with other healthcare services, such as specialists and hospitals, impacts the efficiency and effectiveness of care delivery.
Standout practices, if any, contribute positively to the overall health score. These practices might be recognized for their patient-centered approach, their commitment to quality improvement, or their innovative use of technology. Perhaps a practice in Vance has implemented a successful chronic disease management program, leading to improved outcomes for patients with diabetes or heart disease. Or maybe a clinic has received accolades for its patient satisfaction scores. Identifying these standout practices helps to highlight best practices and provides a model for other providers to emulate. Examining their operational models, staffing structures, and patient care philosophies offers valuable insights into what works well in the local healthcare environment.
Telemedicine adoption is becoming increasingly important, especially in rural areas like Vance. Telemedicine allows patients to access healthcare services remotely, reducing the need for travel and improving access to specialists who may not be readily available locally. Assessing telemedicine adoption involves evaluating the availability of telehealth appointments, the types of services offered via telemedicine (e.g., virtual consultations, remote monitoring), and the technological infrastructure supporting these services. Factors like internet access and digital literacy among the patient population also influence the success of telemedicine initiatives. Practices that have embraced telemedicine demonstrate a commitment to expanding access to care and improving patient convenience.
Mental health resources are a crucial component of overall health, yet often underserved, especially in rural communities. Evaluating mental health resources in Vance requires assessing the availability of psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and counselors. Are there enough mental health professionals to meet the needs of the community? Are these services affordable and accessible, accepting various insurance plans and offering sliding-scale fees when needed? Furthermore, examining the availability of support groups, crisis intervention services, and mental health education programs is essential. The integration of mental health services with primary care is also a key factor. Does the local primary care practice screen patients for mental health issues and offer referrals to appropriate services?
The overall health score for doctors in ZIP Code 29163 and primary care availability in Vance is not easily quantifiable without detailed data. However, based on the factors discussed, it is likely that the score is moderate, with room for improvement. The rural nature of the area presents challenges in physician recruitment and retention, potentially impacting the physician-to-patient ratio and the availability of specialists. While primary care availability may be adequate, the accessibility of mental health services could be a significant concern. The adoption of telemedicine offers a promising avenue for improving access to care, but its success depends on infrastructure and patient acceptance. Identifying and supporting standout practices and promoting best practices in patient care can help to improve the overall health score.
For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in Vance and surrounding areas, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps provide detailed information on physician locations, healthcare facilities, and other relevant data, offering a valuable tool for understanding healthcare access and identifying areas for improvement.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like