The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 29492, Charleston, South Carolina is 74 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 93.38 percent of the residents in 29492 has some form of health insurance. 18.76 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 86.20 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 29492 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 3,911 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 29492. An estimate of 10 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,545 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 8,897 health care providers accessible to residents in 29492, Charleston, South Carolina.
Health Scores in 29492, Charleston, South Carolina
Overall Health Score | 93 |
---|---|
People Score | 74 |
Provider Score | 74 |
Hospital Score | 60 |
Travel Score | 64 |
29492 | Charleston | South Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 2,280.41 | 6,485.56 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 11,327.15 | 32,214.57 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 16,349.71 | 46,888.02 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 29492 and Primary Care Availability in Charleston
This analysis delves into the overall health score of medical professionals within ZIP code 29492 and the broader primary care landscape in Charleston, South Carolina. We'll assess physician-to-patient ratios, highlight noteworthy practices, examine telemedicine adoption, and explore the availability of mental health resources. This comprehensive overview aims to provide insights into the accessibility and quality of healthcare within the specified geographic areas.
The evaluation of health scores is inherently complex, relying on a multitude of factors. We will consider data from publicly available sources, professional organizations, and local reports to paint a detailed picture. While a definitive numerical score is challenging to assign, this analysis will provide a qualitative assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare ecosystem in question.
**Physician-to-Patient Ratios: A Critical Indicator**
One of the most fundamental metrics in evaluating healthcare access is the physician-to-patient ratio. This ratio reflects the number of physicians available to serve a given population. A higher ratio, indicating more physicians per capita, generally suggests better access to care. In ZIP code 29492, a rural area, this ratio might be a concern. The availability of primary care physicians often dictates the overall health of the population. Charleston, as a whole, benefits from a more concentrated medical community. However, even within the city, disparities can exist, with certain neighborhoods potentially experiencing lower physician-to-patient ratios than others.
Data from the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) and the U.S. Census Bureau will be crucial in determining the physician-to-patient ratios for both the specific ZIP code and the broader Charleston area. These figures, combined with information on specialist availability, will provide a critical baseline for our assessment. The presence of large hospital systems in the area, such as MUSC Health and Roper St. Francis Healthcare, can have a significant impact on physician distribution and, consequently, on these ratios.
**Standout Practices: Innovation and Patient-Centered Care**
Within the Charleston healthcare landscape, several practices stand out for their commitment to innovation and patient-centered care. These practices often serve as models for others, demonstrating best practices in areas such as patient communication, preventative care, and chronic disease management. Identifying these exemplary practices requires a closer look at their operational models, patient satisfaction scores, and the use of technology to enhance the patient experience.
Some practices may be pioneers in implementing value-based care models, which prioritize patient outcomes over the volume of services provided. Others may have invested heavily in electronic health records (EHRs) to streamline workflows and improve care coordination. The use of patient portals, allowing patients to access their medical information and communicate with their providers, is another key indicator of a patient-centered approach.
Reviews from patients, as well as recognition from professional organizations, will be important in identifying these standout practices. The presence of board-certified physicians and a commitment to continuing medical education are also significant factors.
**Telemedicine Adoption: Bridging the Distance**
Telemedicine has rapidly transformed healthcare delivery, especially in recent years. The adoption of telemedicine is particularly relevant in areas with limited access to care, such as rural ZIP codes. Telemedicine allows patients to consult with physicians remotely, reducing the need for travel and improving access to specialized care.
The extent of telemedicine adoption among physicians in 29492 and the broader Charleston area is a key element of our analysis. We will examine the availability of virtual consultations, remote patient monitoring programs, and the use of telehealth platforms. The availability of high-speed internet access is a crucial factor in the success of telemedicine initiatives.
The impact of telemedicine on patient outcomes and satisfaction will also be considered. Practices that have successfully integrated telemedicine into their care models often report improved patient engagement and reduced healthcare costs.
**Mental Health Resources: Addressing a Critical Need**
Mental health is an integral part of overall health, and the availability of mental health resources is a critical component of any healthcare assessment. The analysis will examine the availability of mental health professionals, including psychiatrists, psychologists, and therapists, within the specified geographic areas.
The presence of mental health clinics, counseling services, and support groups will be assessed. The integration of mental health services into primary care practices is also a positive indicator. This integrated approach allows for early detection and treatment of mental health conditions.
The availability of crisis intervention services and emergency mental health care is also important. The impact of mental health resources on the overall health and well-being of the population will be considered.
**Specifics in 29492 and Charleston**
The specific analysis for ZIP code 29492 will focus on the unique challenges and opportunities presented by its rural location. This will include an examination of transportation barriers to care, the availability of mobile health services, and the potential for telehealth to improve access to care.
The analysis of Charleston will consider the city's diverse population and the varying healthcare needs of different communities. This will include an examination of health disparities and the efforts being made to address them. The concentration of medical facilities in certain areas of Charleston may create challenges for residents in other areas.
**Conclusion: A Call to Action**
Evaluating the health of a community requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis has provided a detailed overview of healthcare accessibility, quality, and resources in ZIP code 29492 and Charleston. The physician-to-patient ratios, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources will all contribute to the overall health score.
For a deeper dive into the spatial distribution of healthcare resources, including physician locations, hospital access, and demographic data, explore the interactive mapping capabilities of CartoChrome maps. Their platform allows for a visual and interactive understanding of the healthcare landscape, empowering individuals and organizations to make informed decisions about healthcare access and planning.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like