The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 29614, Greenville, South Carolina is 71 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 87.42 percent of the residents in 29614 has some form of health insurance. 9.84 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 78.63 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 29614 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 288 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 152 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 29614. An estimate of 45 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 8 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 21,111 health care providers accessible to residents in 29614, Greenville, South Carolina.
Health Scores in 29614, Greenville, South Carolina
Overall Health Score | 55 |
---|---|
People Score | 17 |
Provider Score | 71 |
Hospital Score | 63 |
Travel Score | 48 |
29614 | Greenville | South Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 17,972.53 | 480.98 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 1,085,666.67 | 2,227.61 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 2,450,769.23 | 2,999.49 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 29614 and Primary Care Availability in Greenville
Assessing the overall health landscape within ZIP code 29614 and the broader context of primary care availability in Greenville, South Carolina, requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis will delve into key indicators, including physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption rates, and the accessibility of mental health resources. This evaluation aims to provide a comprehensive 'Overall Health Score' assessment, highlighting strengths and weaknesses to inform residents and healthcare stakeholders.
The physician-to-patient ratio serves as a fundamental metric. It directly impacts access to care. A higher ratio, meaning more patients per physician, often indicates potential challenges in securing timely appointments and personalized attention. Data specific to 29614 needs careful scrutiny. While national averages provide a benchmark, local factors like the age distribution of the population, prevalence of chronic diseases, and the concentration of specialists within the ZIP code significantly influence the true picture. Publicly available data from sources like the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) and the American Medical Association (AMA) would be crucial for a precise calculation. This data would reveal if the area faces a shortage of primary care physicians, potentially leading to longer wait times and increased pressure on existing healthcare providers. The broader Greenville area's physician-to-patient ratio is relevant, as residents may seek care outside their immediate ZIP code.
Identifying standout practices is critical. These practices often serve as models for quality care and innovation. Assessing this requires evaluating several factors. Patient satisfaction scores, often available through online platforms and insurance provider feedback, provide valuable insights into patient experiences. The presence of board-certified physicians, accreditation by recognized healthcare organizations (e.g., the Joint Commission), and the adoption of advanced technologies, such as electronic health records (EHRs) and patient portals, are also key indicators. Furthermore, the range of services offered, including preventative care, chronic disease management, and specialized programs, contributes to a practice's overall quality. Specific practices within 29614 and Greenville should be identified, their strengths and weaknesses assessed.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical area. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the use of telehealth, demonstrating its potential to improve access to care, particularly for those with mobility limitations, transportation challenges, or residing in underserved areas. The extent of telemedicine adoption within 29614 and Greenville needs evaluation. This includes the availability of virtual consultations, remote patient monitoring, and the use of telehealth platforms for follow-up appointments and medication management. Factors influencing adoption include physician willingness, patient acceptance, insurance coverage for telehealth services, and the availability of reliable internet access. Practices demonstrating a commitment to telehealth should be recognized for their efforts to enhance accessibility and convenience.
Mental health resources are an essential component of overall health. The availability of mental health services within 29614 and Greenville is crucial. This includes access to psychiatrists, psychologists, therapists, and counselors. Assessing this involves evaluating the number of mental health providers, the types of services offered (e.g., individual therapy, group therapy, medication management), and the availability of specialized programs for specific conditions (e.g., anxiety, depression, substance use disorders). The presence of mental health support within primary care practices, such as integrated behavioral health services, is also a positive indicator. The availability of crisis intervention services and support groups further enhances the mental health landscape.
The 'Overall Health Score' for 29614 and Greenville will be a composite of these factors. A high score would indicate a favorable physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of high-quality practices, widespread telemedicine adoption, and readily accessible mental health resources. Conversely, a low score would suggest potential challenges in accessing care, limited resources, and a need for improvement. The specific weighting of each factor will depend on its relative importance and the specific priorities of the assessment. For example, in a community with a high prevalence of chronic diseases, the availability of chronic disease management programs might be weighted more heavily. The score should be dynamic, reflecting ongoing changes in the healthcare landscape.
Improving the 'Overall Health Score' requires a collaborative effort. Healthcare providers, policymakers, community organizations, and residents all have a role to play. Addressing physician shortages, expanding telemedicine capabilities, increasing access to mental health services, and promoting preventative care are crucial steps. Data-driven decision-making, informed by comprehensive assessments like this one, is essential to guide these efforts effectively. Regular monitoring of key indicators and the implementation of evidence-based interventions are vital for continuous improvement.
This analysis provides a framework for understanding the health landscape in 29614 and Greenville. It highlights the key factors that contribute to the 'Overall Health Score' and emphasizes the need for ongoing assessment and improvement. Further investigation, including the collection of specific data and the involvement of local stakeholders, is necessary to gain a more detailed and accurate understanding of the healthcare environment. This deeper dive is crucial for developing targeted interventions to enhance the health and well-being of the community.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like