The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 24850, Jolo, West Virginia is 11 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 0.00 percent of the residents in 24850 has some form of health insurance. 0.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 0.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 24850 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 24850. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 445 health care providers accessible to residents in 24850, Jolo, West Virginia.
Health Scores in 24850, Jolo, West Virginia
| Overall Health Score | 15 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 37 |
| Provider Score | 11 |
| Hospital Score | 62 |
| Travel Score | 24 |
| 24850 | Jolo | West Virginia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: ZIP Code 24850 and Jolo Primary Care
Analyzing the overall health landscape in ZIP Code 24850 and the primary care availability in Jolo requires a multifaceted approach. We must delve into physician-to-patient ratios, identify standout practices, assess telemedicine adoption, and evaluate the availability of mental health resources. This analysis will ultimately paint a picture of the health accessibility and quality within these specific areas.
ZIP Code 24850, a geographically defined area, requires a granular approach to understand its healthcare ecosystem. The initial step involves determining the physician-to-patient ratio. This crucial metric provides insight into the accessibility of care. A high ratio, indicating a larger number of patients per physician, often suggests potential challenges in securing timely appointments and personalized attention. Conversely, a lower ratio generally indicates better access. Publicly available data from sources like the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and state medical boards will be essential to calculate this ratio accurately. Beyond the raw number, the distribution of physicians across different specialties (e.g., internal medicine, pediatrics, geriatrics) within the ZIP Code is also vital.
Identifying standout practices within 24850 involves evaluating various factors. These include patient satisfaction ratings, the range of services offered, and the adoption of innovative technologies. Online review platforms, such as Healthgrades and Vitals, can provide valuable insights into patient experiences. Practices with consistently high ratings, indicating positive patient interactions and effective care, are prime candidates for recognition. The availability of comprehensive services, including preventive care, chronic disease management, and specialized treatments, further enhances a practice's standing. Furthermore, the integration of technology, such as electronic health records (EHRs) and patient portals, streamlines operations and improves patient communication.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical aspect of the health score analysis. The utilization of telehealth services has surged in recent years, particularly during the pandemic. The availability of virtual consultations, remote patient monitoring, and online prescription refills significantly impacts access to care, especially for individuals with mobility limitations or those residing in rural areas. Assessing telemedicine adoption involves determining the number of practices offering telehealth services, the types of services available, and the ease of access for patients. Practices that have embraced telemedicine demonstrate a commitment to expanding access and providing convenient care options.
The availability of mental health resources is a crucial component of overall health. Access to mental healthcare is often a significant challenge, particularly in underserved areas. Evaluating mental health resources involves assessing the number of psychiatrists, psychologists, and licensed therapists available within the ZIP Code. The presence of community mental health centers, outpatient clinics, and support groups is also essential. Furthermore, the integration of mental healthcare into primary care settings can improve access and reduce the stigma associated with mental health issues. Examining the availability of substance abuse treatment programs is also essential, as substance abuse often co-occurs with mental health disorders.
Turning our attention to Jolo and its primary care availability, a different set of considerations comes into play. Jolo, as a geographical location, requires a focused assessment of primary care services. The analysis begins by determining the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) serving the population. This number, combined with the population size, will determine the physician-to-patient ratio specifically for primary care. A low ratio in this context signals a potential shortage of PCPs, which can lead to longer wait times for appointments and reduced access to preventative care.
The geographical distribution of primary care practices within Jolo is also critical. Are practices concentrated in certain areas, leaving other areas underserved? This assessment requires mapping the locations of primary care practices and analyzing their proximity to the population. The availability of transportation options to reach these practices is also a relevant factor.
The scope of services offered by primary care practices in Jolo is another key consideration. Do these practices offer a full range of primary care services, including preventative care, chronic disease management, and acute care? The presence of on-site laboratory services, X-ray facilities, and other diagnostic capabilities can enhance the convenience and efficiency of care.
The integration of technology in primary care practices within Jolo also warrants evaluation. Do practices utilize EHRs to manage patient records? Do they offer patient portals for communication and appointment scheduling? Are they adopting telemedicine to provide virtual consultations? The level of technological integration can impact the efficiency of care delivery and the patient experience.
Finally, the availability of resources to support primary care in Jolo should be assessed. Are there referral networks to specialists? Are there support services for patients with chronic conditions? The presence of these resources can enhance the effectiveness of primary care and improve patient outcomes.
In conclusion, assessing the overall health score for ZIP Code 24850 and primary care availability in Jolo requires a comprehensive evaluation of physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources. The analysis must consider both quantitative data and qualitative factors to provide a nuanced understanding of the healthcare landscape. This detailed assessment will reveal the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare systems in these areas, allowing for targeted interventions to improve access, quality, and patient outcomes.
For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in these areas, including physician locations, practice types, and resource availability, we encourage you to explore the interactive mapping capabilities offered by CartoChrome. Their platform allows for a dynamic and insightful view of the data, enabling you to make informed decisions and gain a deeper understanding of the health ecosystem.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like