24881, Roderfield, West Virginia Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 24881, Roderfield, West Virginia is 12 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 24881 has some form of health insurance. 40.25 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 91.95 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 24881 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 46 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 24881. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 70 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 144 health care providers accessible to residents in 24881, Roderfield, West Virginia.

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 24881 & Primary Care Availability in Roderfield

This analysis provides an overall health score assessment for the medical landscape within ZIP code 24881, specifically focusing on primary care availability in Roderfield, West Virginia. The assessment considers various factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, notable practices, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources. The goal is to provide a comprehensive overview of healthcare access and quality within this specific geographic area.

The foundation of any health score assessment lies in understanding the basic demographics. ZIP code 24881, encompassing the town of Roderfield and surrounding areas, is characterized by a relatively small population. This is important context for evaluating the physician-to-patient ratio, a critical indicator of healthcare access. A low ratio, meaning a high number of patients per physician, can indicate potential challenges in securing timely appointments and receiving adequate care.

Accurate data on the physician-to-patient ratio requires accessing current, reliable information from sources like the West Virginia Board of Medicine and the US Census Bureau. Without this precise data, an estimation based on publicly available information is necessary. Given the rural nature of the area, it is reasonable to anticipate a higher-than-average patient-to-physician ratio compared to more urbanized regions. This potential scarcity of physicians highlights the importance of examining other factors that influence healthcare accessibility and quality.

Beyond the raw numbers, the presence and quality of primary care practices are crucial. Identifying standout practices involves researching the reputation of existing clinics and physician groups within the area. This entails reviewing patient testimonials, assessing the range of services offered, and evaluating the practice’s commitment to patient-centered care. Practices known for offering comprehensive services, including preventative care, chronic disease management, and coordination of specialist referrals, contribute positively to the overall health score.

Telemedicine adoption is another important consideration in assessing healthcare access, particularly in rural areas. Telemedicine, the use of technology to provide healthcare services remotely, can significantly improve access to care by reducing the need for travel and connecting patients with specialists who may not be locally available. Evaluating the extent to which practices in 24881 have embraced telemedicine, including the types of services offered and the ease of use for patients, is a key factor. Practices that actively utilize telemedicine to offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and other telehealth services contribute to a higher overall health score.

Mental health resources represent a crucial component of a comprehensive healthcare system. The availability of mental health services, including psychiatrists, therapists, and counseling centers, is essential for addressing the emotional and psychological well-being of the community. Assessing the availability of mental health professionals, the range of services offered, and the accessibility of these resources is critical. Areas with limited mental health resources often receive a lower health score.

The quality of care is another important factor in determining the overall health score. This involves examining factors such as the accreditation status of local hospitals and clinics, the availability of specialized services, and the performance of healthcare providers on quality metrics. Hospitals and clinics that have earned accreditation from reputable organizations, such as The Joint Commission, demonstrate a commitment to quality and safety. The availability of specialized services, such as cardiology, oncology, and physical therapy, also contributes to a higher health score.

The healthcare infrastructure, including the presence of pharmacies, diagnostic imaging centers, and other support services, is also relevant. The availability of these resources ensures that patients can readily access the services they need. The presence of a well-stocked pharmacy, for example, is essential for patients to obtain their medications. The availability of diagnostic imaging services, such as X-rays and MRIs, is critical for accurate diagnosis and treatment.

The social determinants of health, such as poverty, education, and access to healthy food, also influence the health score. These factors are outside the direct control of healthcare providers, but they significantly impact the health of the community. Areas with high rates of poverty and limited access to education and healthy food often experience poorer health outcomes. Addressing these social determinants of health is essential for improving the overall health score.

The role of community health initiatives and programs should be considered. These programs often play a vital role in promoting health and wellness within the community. Examples include health education programs, chronic disease management programs, and programs that address specific health disparities. The presence of these programs can improve the overall health score.

The presence of any unique challenges or opportunities specific to the Roderfield area must be considered. This could include factors such as the prevalence of certain chronic diseases, the impact of environmental factors on health, or any specific health disparities within the community. Understanding these unique factors is essential for a comprehensive health score assessment.

In conclusion, assessing the overall health score for doctors in ZIP code 24881 and primary care availability in Roderfield requires a multifaceted approach. It involves evaluating physician-to-patient ratios, identifying standout practices, assessing telemedicine adoption, examining mental health resources, and considering the broader social determinants of health. The specific health score for this area would depend on the data available, but based on the factors discussed, it's likely the area faces some challenges related to access and resources.

For a more detailed and visually informative understanding of the healthcare landscape in ZIP code 24881 and surrounding areas, explore the power of spatial data analysis. **Visit CartoChrome maps** to visualize the distribution of healthcare providers, analyze patient demographics, and gain deeper insights into healthcare accessibility.