The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 25112, Institute, West Virginia is 80 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 94.34 percent of the residents in 25112 has some form of health insurance. 7.55 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 86.79 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 25112 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 11 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 25112. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 447 health care providers accessible to residents in 25112, Institute, West Virginia.
Health Scores in 25112, Institute, West Virginia
Overall Health Score | 93 |
---|---|
People Score | 95 |
Provider Score | 80 |
Hospital Score | 41 |
Travel Score | 55 |
25112 | Institute | West Virginia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 121,509.43 | 690,283.02 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Institute, WV (ZIP Code 25112)
Assessing the overall health landscape within Institute, West Virginia (ZIP Code 25112) requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis considers physician availability, the quality of primary care, the integration of technology like telemedicine, and the accessibility of mental health services. We will then synthesize these factors into a comprehensive "Overall Health Score," offering insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare ecosystem.
The foundation of a healthy community rests on the availability of primary care physicians. In Institute, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator. While precise, real-time data fluctuates, understanding the general availability is crucial. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potential delays in addressing health concerns. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests greater accessibility, fostering a proactive approach to health management. Further research into the specific number of active primary care physicians, considering both general practitioners and internal medicine specialists, is essential for a more accurate assessment.
Beyond simple numbers, the quality of primary care significantly impacts the overall health score. This involves evaluating the practices within the ZIP code, focusing on factors like accreditation, patient satisfaction, and the breadth of services offered. Are the practices equipped with modern diagnostic tools? Do they offer comprehensive preventative care, including screenings and vaccinations? Are they connected to a broader network of specialists for referrals? Identifying standout practices within Institute is vital. These practices often serve as models, demonstrating best practices in patient care and contributing to a higher overall health score. Investigating patient reviews, examining the types of insurance accepted, and assessing the availability of extended hours are key considerations when evaluating the quality of primary care.
Telemedicine adoption has emerged as a significant factor in healthcare accessibility, particularly in rural areas. The ability to consult with a physician remotely can overcome geographical barriers, reduce travel time, and provide timely access to care. Assessing the extent of telemedicine integration within Institute's primary care practices is crucial. Do physicians offer virtual consultations? Do they utilize remote monitoring technologies for chronic disease management? The presence of telemedicine capabilities can significantly boost the overall health score, especially for patients with mobility limitations or those living in remote areas.
Mental health resources are an integral component of overall well-being. The availability of mental health services, including therapists, psychiatrists, and support groups, directly impacts the community's health score. Assessing the presence of mental health providers within Institute, the types of services offered (e.g., individual therapy, group therapy, medication management), and the accessibility of these services (e.g., insurance acceptance, wait times) is essential. Furthermore, exploring community initiatives focused on mental health awareness and support can provide a more holistic understanding of the mental health landscape. A robust mental health infrastructure contributes significantly to a higher overall health score.
Synthesizing these factors – physician-to-patient ratios, the quality of primary care, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources – allows for the development of an "Overall Health Score" for Institute. This score is not a static number but rather a dynamic assessment reflecting the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare ecosystem. A higher score indicates greater accessibility, quality, and comprehensiveness of healthcare services, while a lower score highlights areas needing improvement.
To improve the overall health score, several strategies can be considered. Increasing the number of primary care physicians through recruitment incentives and supporting medical education programs can address physician shortages. Encouraging practices to adopt telemedicine technologies can enhance accessibility and convenience. Expanding mental health services through increased funding, partnerships with community organizations, and reducing the stigma associated with mental illness can improve mental well-being. Promoting preventative care through education and outreach programs can empower residents to take a proactive approach to their health.
Furthermore, collaboration between healthcare providers, community organizations, and local government is essential for creating a thriving healthcare ecosystem. Sharing resources, coordinating care, and addressing social determinants of health can significantly improve the overall health score. Regular monitoring and evaluation of healthcare indicators are crucial for identifying areas needing improvement and tracking progress over time.
Understanding the healthcare landscape in Institute, WV (ZIP Code 25112) is complex. A comprehensive analysis requires a deep dive into the factors mentioned above. The "Overall Health Score" is a valuable tool for assessing the health of the community, identifying areas for improvement, and guiding efforts to create a healthier future for the residents of Institute.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like