25434, Paw Paw, West Virginia Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 25434, Paw Paw, West Virginia is 10 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 83.45 percent of the residents in 25434 has some form of health insurance. 47.80 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 41.68 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 25434 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 566 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 25434. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 402 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 552 health care providers accessible to residents in 25434, Paw Paw, West Virginia.

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Paw Paw, WV (ZIP Code 25434)

Analyzing the overall health landscape in Paw Paw, West Virginia, (ZIP Code 25434) requires a nuanced approach. It's a community where access to healthcare, particularly primary care, is a critical determinant of overall well-being. This analysis will delve into the availability of primary care physicians, the physician-to-patient ratio, the adoption of telemedicine, the presence of mental health resources, and identify standout practices within the area. The aim is to provide a comprehensive "Overall Health Score" assessment, acknowledging the challenges and opportunities present in this rural setting.

The cornerstone of any health assessment lies in the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs). Paw Paw, like many rural communities, often faces a shortage. Determining the exact number of practicing PCPs within the ZIP code is the first step. This number, when compared to the population of 25434, provides a crucial physician-to-patient ratio. A high ratio, meaning fewer doctors per capita, signals potential difficulties in accessing timely and consistent care. This can lead to delayed diagnoses, worsening chronic conditions, and ultimately, poorer health outcomes. Data from sources like the West Virginia Board of Medicine and the US Census Bureau are essential for this calculation.

Beyond the raw numbers, the distribution of PCPs matters. Are the existing physicians clustered in one area, leaving other parts of the community underserved? Are they accepting new patients? What are their specialties and areas of expertise? A diverse and accessible primary care workforce is essential for addressing the varied health needs of a community. This includes the availability of family medicine physicians, internal medicine specialists, and potentially, pediatricians.

The quality of care is another key element. While a complete assessment requires patient surveys and clinical data, some indicators can be gleaned from public sources. Reviewing online reviews, if available, can provide insights into patient satisfaction, wait times, and the overall patient experience. Accreditation status of local hospitals or clinics, if any, also provides a measure of quality. This is not a perfect measure, but it can provide a baseline.

Telemedicine adoption is becoming increasingly important, especially in rural areas. Does the local healthcare infrastructure support telehealth visits? Are physicians offering virtual consultations for routine check-ups, medication management, or specialist referrals? Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, improving access to care for those who might struggle to travel long distances. Assessing the availability of telehealth services, including the types of services offered and the ease of access, is a key factor in evaluating the overall health score.

Mental health resources are often under-resourced in rural areas. Evaluating the availability of mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and licensed therapists, is crucial. Are there mental health clinics or support groups within the community? Are mental health services integrated into primary care practices? The presence and accessibility of mental health resources significantly impact the overall health and well-being of the population.

Identifying standout practices within Paw Paw is essential. This involves recognizing those clinics or individual physicians who are demonstrating a commitment to quality care, patient satisfaction, and innovative practices. These practices might be actively embracing telemedicine, offering extended hours, or providing specialized services tailored to the needs of the community. Highlighting these practices can provide a positive example and inspire other healthcare providers.

The overall health score for Paw Paw (25434) will be a composite of these factors. It is important to acknowledge that this is a complex assessment. A low physician-to-patient ratio, limited telemedicine adoption, and a scarcity of mental health resources would negatively impact the score. Conversely, a well-distributed and accessible primary care workforce, robust telemedicine offerings, and readily available mental health services would contribute to a higher score.

The final assessment should consider the challenges inherent in rural healthcare, such as limited resources and geographical isolation. It is essential to provide a realistic evaluation, acknowledging the efforts of healthcare providers while also highlighting areas where improvement is needed. This assessment should not only focus on the current state of healthcare but also on the potential for future development.

The analysis should also address the potential for collaboration between healthcare providers, community organizations, and local government. Partnerships can be crucial in addressing health disparities, improving access to care, and promoting overall wellness. This could include initiatives to improve health literacy, expand access to healthy food options, and promote physical activity.

The evaluation should also consider the socioeconomic factors that influence health outcomes. Poverty, unemployment, and lack of access to transportation can all impact a community's overall health. Addressing these social determinants of health is essential for creating a healthier community. This requires a holistic approach that goes beyond healthcare and includes addressing issues like housing, education, and economic opportunity.

In conclusion, assessing the overall health score for Paw Paw (25434) requires a comprehensive understanding of the local healthcare landscape. It necessitates analyzing physician availability, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and the quality of care. This assessment should also consider the challenges and opportunities unique to this rural community, while recognizing the importance of collaboration, addressing social determinants of health, and promoting a holistic approach to wellness.

Want to visualize this data and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Paw Paw and surrounding areas? Explore the power of geographic data analysis with CartoChrome maps.