The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 25505, Big Creek, West Virginia is 18 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 25505 has some form of health insurance. 84.79 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 28.40 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 25505 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 151 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 25505. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 136 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 165 health care providers accessible to residents in 25505, Big Creek, West Virginia.
Health Scores in 25505, Big Creek, West Virginia
| Overall Health Score | 33 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 91 |
| Provider Score | 18 |
| Hospital Score | 35 |
| Travel Score | 24 |
| 25505 | Big Creek | West Virginia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 3,346.86 | 112,028.40 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 10,927.15 | 364,039.74 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 11,985.29 | 398,088.24 | 0.00 |
The health landscape within ZIP code 25505, encompassing the Big Creek area, presents a complex picture, one that demands a nuanced understanding of resource availability and community needs. An "Overall Health Score" for this region, while inherently subjective, can be constructed by analyzing several key factors. This analysis will delve into physician-to-patient ratios, highlight standout practices, assess telemedicine adoption, and examine the availability of mental health resources. This assessment will then inform a concluding call to action.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a fundamental indicator of access to care. In Big Creek, like many rural communities, the physician-to-patient ratio likely presents a challenge. A low number of primary care physicians, specialists, and other healthcare professionals relative to the population suggests potential difficulties in securing timely appointments, leading to delayed diagnoses and treatment. This scarcity necessitates careful management of existing resources and innovative approaches to healthcare delivery. The specific ratio for 25505 requires dedicated data collection, but anecdotal evidence and broader regional trends suggest a need for improvement.
The identification of standout practices is crucial. These are the healthcare providers that demonstrate excellence in patient care, operational efficiency, and community engagement. Practices that prioritize patient communication, utilize electronic health records effectively, and offer extended hours or weekend appointments are often highly regarded. Furthermore, those that participate in community outreach programs and actively address the unique health challenges of the local population deserve special recognition. A detailed investigation would involve patient surveys, peer reviews, and an examination of quality metrics to pinpoint the practices exceeding expectations.
Telemedicine adoption represents a significant opportunity to improve healthcare access, particularly in geographically isolated areas. Telemedicine allows patients to consult with physicians remotely, reducing the need for travel and potentially expanding the reach of specialists. The extent of telemedicine integration in 25505 is a critical factor in the overall health score. Practices that embrace telemedicine, offering virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient portals, are likely to receive higher marks. Conversely, those that lag behind in telemedicine adoption risk limiting patient access and potentially contributing to health disparities.
Mental health resources are a critical component of overall well-being, often overlooked in rural communities. The availability of psychiatrists, therapists, counselors, and support groups is essential for addressing mental health needs. The presence of these resources, along with programs that address substance abuse and promote mental wellness, significantly impacts the overall health score. The analysis should consider the number of mental health professionals, the accessibility of their services (including insurance acceptance and wait times), and the existence of community-based mental health initiatives. A lack of sufficient mental health resources would negatively affect the overall score.
Primary care availability in Big Creek is a crucial factor in determining the overall health score. Primary care physicians serve as the first point of contact for patients, providing preventive care, managing chronic conditions, and coordinating referrals to specialists. The number of primary care physicians, their geographic distribution, and their willingness to accept new patients directly influence the community's access to care. The analysis must also consider factors such as appointment availability, wait times, and the availability of after-hours care. A limited primary care infrastructure would significantly diminish the overall health score.
The overall health score is not simply a numerical value; it is a composite assessment reflecting the interplay of various factors. A low physician-to-patient ratio, limited telemedicine adoption, and insufficient mental health resources would negatively impact the score. Conversely, the presence of standout practices, robust primary care availability, and a strong focus on community health initiatives would elevate the score. The specific weighting of each factor depends on the priorities and values of the assessment.
The assessment of 25505's healthcare landscape reveals a need for strategic interventions. Addressing the physician shortage through recruitment incentives and telehealth initiatives is paramount. Promoting telemedicine adoption among existing practices is critical for expanding access to care. Strengthening mental health services through increased funding and community outreach programs is essential for improving overall well-being. Furthermore, supporting and recognizing standout practices can serve as a model for other providers.
The overall health score is dynamic, reflecting the ever-changing nature of healthcare. Ongoing monitoring and evaluation are necessary to track progress, identify areas for improvement, and adapt to evolving community needs. Regular assessments, incorporating updated data and feedback from patients and providers, are essential for maintaining a high standard of care.
The Big Creek area, like many rural communities, faces unique healthcare challenges. Addressing these challenges requires a comprehensive and collaborative approach, involving healthcare providers, community organizations, and policymakers. By focusing on access, quality, and innovation, the community can work towards improving its overall health score and ensuring a healthier future for all residents.
A detailed analysis of the health landscape in 25505, with specific data on physician-to-patient ratios, practice performance, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources, would provide a more precise overall health score. This analysis would be invaluable for identifying areas for improvement and developing targeted interventions.
To visualize the health landscape of Big Creek and surrounding areas, and to gain a deeper understanding of the factors influencing the overall health score, we recommend exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a spatial representation of healthcare resources, demographic data, and health outcomes, offering valuable insights for healthcare professionals, policymakers, and community members. Visit CartoChrome maps to unlock the potential of data visualization and gain a comprehensive understanding of the health of your community.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like