25621, Gilbert, West Virginia Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 25621, Gilbert, West Virginia is 18 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 92.69 percent of the residents in 25621 has some form of health insurance. 65.58 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 45.15 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 25621 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 315 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 25621. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 478 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1 health care providers accessible to residents in 25621, Gilbert, West Virginia.

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Gilbert, WV (ZIP Code 25621)

Analyzing the overall health landscape in Gilbert, West Virginia (ZIP code 25621) requires a multifaceted approach, considering not just the raw number of physicians but also the quality of care, accessibility, and the availability of crucial support services. This analysis aims to provide an "Overall Health Score" assessment, focusing on primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources. The goal is to paint a comprehensive picture of the healthcare ecosystem within this specific community.

The foundation of any health score assessment lies in understanding the physician-to-patient ratio. This metric provides a fundamental indicator of access to care. In Gilbert, and indeed much of rural West Virginia, the physician-to-patient ratio likely presents a significant challenge. National averages often don't reflect the reality of geographically isolated areas. A high ratio, meaning fewer doctors per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, increased travel distances for patients, and potentially reduced continuity of care. Accurate data on the precise physician-to-patient ratio within ZIP code 25621 is essential for a proper baseline. Public health resources, state medical boards, and local hospital data are vital for this information.

Beyond the raw numbers, the quality and reputation of existing primary care practices are crucial. Identifying "standout practices" involves examining patient reviews, assessing the range of services offered, and evaluating the practice's commitment to patient-centered care. Factors to consider include the availability of extended hours, the ease of appointment scheduling, the responsiveness of staff, and the integration of technology to enhance patient experience. Practices that actively participate in community outreach programs and demonstrate a commitment to preventative care initiatives should be recognized. This involves a deep dive into local healthcare provider websites, patient feedback platforms, and potentially, interviews with local community leaders.

Telemedicine adoption presents both opportunities and challenges in a rural setting. The potential to bridge geographical barriers and provide access to specialists and consultations remotely is significant. However, successful telemedicine implementation requires reliable internet connectivity, patient access to necessary technology, and a willingness from both providers and patients to embrace this new model of care. Assessing the level of telemedicine adoption in Gilbert involves investigating which practices offer telehealth services, the types of services available (e.g., virtual appointments, remote monitoring), and the patient utilization rates. This data can be obtained from local healthcare providers and potentially from regional telehealth networks.

Mental health resources are a critical component of overall health. The availability of mental health services, including psychiatrists, therapists, and counselors, is particularly important in areas facing socioeconomic challenges and high rates of chronic diseases. Evaluating the mental health landscape in Gilbert requires identifying the number of mental health professionals practicing in the area, assessing the types of services offered (e.g., individual therapy, group therapy, medication management), and evaluating the accessibility of these services. This includes examining wait times for appointments, the acceptance of various insurance plans, and the availability of support groups or community mental health programs. Local health departments, community mental health centers, and state-level mental health agencies are key sources of information.

The integration of these factors – physician-to-patient ratios, practice quality, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources – will determine the "Overall Health Score" for Gilbert. This score should not be a static number but rather a dynamic assessment that reflects the evolving healthcare landscape. The score should be used to identify areas of strength and weakness, allowing for targeted interventions and improvements. For example, a low physician-to-patient ratio might necessitate efforts to recruit more physicians or to expand telemedicine services. Limited mental health resources could prompt initiatives to increase the availability of mental health professionals or to promote mental health awareness programs.

The success of any healthcare initiative hinges on collaboration and community engagement. Local healthcare providers, community organizations, and government agencies must work together to address the unique health needs of the residents of Gilbert. This requires a shared vision, a commitment to data-driven decision-making, and a willingness to adapt to changing circumstances. The availability of funding, both public and private, is also critical to support healthcare infrastructure, workforce development, and patient support programs.

Ultimately, improving the overall health score in Gilbert requires a long-term commitment to healthcare improvement. It's not a quick fix but rather a continuous process of assessment, intervention, and evaluation. This involves ongoing monitoring of key health indicators, regular assessments of the healthcare infrastructure, and a willingness to embrace innovation and best practices.

To visualize the geographical distribution of healthcare resources, patient demographics, and other relevant data points within Gilbert and surrounding areas, consider exploring the power of interactive mapping. CartoChrome maps can provide valuable insights and support data-driven decision-making in healthcare planning and resource allocation.