The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 25862, Lansing, West Virginia is 38 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 25862 has some form of health insurance. 67.50 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 100.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 25862 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 25862. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 81 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 0 health care providers accessible to residents in 25862, Lansing, West Virginia.
Health Scores in 25862, Lansing, West Virginia
Overall Health Score | 63 |
---|---|
People Score | 98 |
Provider Score | 38 |
Hospital Score | 49 |
Travel Score | 25 |
25862 | Lansing | West Virginia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 25862 & Primary Care Availability in Lansing
This analysis evaluates the overall health landscape for two distinct areas: physicians practicing within ZIP code 25862 (a hypothetical rural area) and the primary care availability in Lansing, Michigan (a city). We will assess various factors, including physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources, to arrive at an overall health score for each. Due to the hypothetical nature of 25862, assumptions will be made based on typical rural healthcare challenges.
**ZIP Code 25862 – A Rural Health Assessment**
The health score for 25862 is likely to be significantly lower than that of Lansing. The primary challenge in rural areas is often access to care. The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator. In 25862, we can hypothesize a ratio significantly higher than the national average, potentially exceeding 2,000 patients per primary care physician. This means each doctor is responsible for a disproportionately large patient population, leading to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time per patient, and a potential strain on the healthcare system.
Standout practices in 25862, if any exist, would be those demonstrating innovative approaches to overcome these challenges. These might include clinics offering extended hours, accepting a wide range of insurance plans, and providing comprehensive services under one roof. A practice that incorporates a strong patient education component, emphasizing preventative care, would also be highly valued. The presence of a federally qualified health center (FQHC) would be a significant asset, as these centers are specifically designed to serve underserved populations.
Telemedicine adoption in 25862 is vital. Given the geographical limitations and potential for limited specialist availability, telemedicine offers a crucial lifeline. Practices utilizing telehealth for routine follow-ups, medication management, and even some specialist consultations would be considered progressive and contribute positively to the overall health score. The success of telemedicine, however, hinges on reliable internet access, a common hurdle in rural areas.
Mental health resources are often scarce in rural settings. The health score for 25862 will be negatively impacted if there is a lack of psychiatrists, therapists, and mental health support groups. The availability of these services, even if provided through telemedicine, is critical. Collaboration between primary care physicians and mental health professionals, allowing for integrated care, would be a significant advantage.
**Lansing, Michigan – A City's Primary Care Landscape**
Lansing, being a city, generally enjoys a more favorable health score compared to a rural ZIP code. The physician-to-patient ratio in Lansing is likely to be closer to, or even better than, the national average. This suggests greater access to primary care physicians. However, this doesn't automatically translate to optimal health outcomes. Distribution of physicians across the city is important; underserved areas might still face access challenges.
Standout practices in Lansing will be those demonstrating a commitment to patient-centered care. This includes practices offering same-day appointments, extended evening and weekend hours, and a user-friendly online portal for appointment scheduling and communication. Practices that embrace a team-based approach, with nurses, medical assistants, and other healthcare professionals working collaboratively, would be highly regarded.
Telemedicine adoption in Lansing, while not as crucial as in 25862, still plays a significant role. It enhances convenience for patients and allows for efficient management of chronic conditions. Practices offering virtual visits for follow-up appointments and medication refills contribute positively to the overall health score. The presence of remote patient monitoring programs, particularly for patients with chronic conditions, would be a significant advantage.
Mental health resources in Lansing are likely to be more readily available than in 25862. The presence of hospitals, community mental health centers, and private practices specializing in mental health services would positively influence the health score. Integrated care models, where primary care physicians collaborate with mental health professionals, are especially beneficial. The availability of support groups and educational resources further enhances the mental health landscape.
**Comparative Analysis and Overall Health Scores**
Based on the factors discussed, the overall health score for 25862 would be significantly lower than that of Lansing. 25862 would likely struggle with access to care, limited specialist availability, and a scarcity of mental health resources. The lack of infrastructure, particularly reliable internet access, could hinder telemedicine adoption.
Lansing, on the other hand, would likely exhibit a higher overall health score, driven by better physician-to-patient ratios, greater access to specialists, and a more robust mental health infrastructure. The city's ability to embrace technology, including telemedicine and remote patient monitoring, would further enhance its health score.
**Conclusion**
The health landscape varies dramatically depending on geographical location. While Lansing, with its urban setting, offers a more favorable environment for primary care access and overall health, rural areas like 25862 face significant challenges. Addressing these disparities requires a multi-faceted approach, including investment in healthcare infrastructure, promotion of telemedicine, and a focus on integrated care models. Understanding the specific needs of each community is crucial for developing effective strategies to improve health outcomes.
To gain a visual understanding of the geographical distribution of healthcare resources, physician density, and potential areas of need, explore the power of data visualization with CartoChrome maps.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like