The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 26321, Alum Bridge, West Virginia is 17 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 90.24 percent of the residents in 26321 has some form of health insurance. 60.37 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 54.88 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 26321 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 23 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 26321. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 36 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,082 health care providers accessible to residents in 26321, Alum Bridge, West Virginia.
Health Scores in 26321, Alum Bridge, West Virginia
Overall Health Score | 45 |
---|---|
People Score | 62 |
Provider Score | 17 |
Hospital Score | 60 |
Travel Score | 47 |
26321 | Alum Bridge | West Virginia | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 39,268.29 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 278,695.65 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 176,388.89 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Overall Health Score Analysis: Alum Bridge, WV (ZIP Code 26321)
Evaluating the overall health landscape within Alum Bridge, West Virginia, specifically focusing on the ZIP code 26321, requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis considers primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the accessibility of mental health resources. The goal is to provide a comprehensive 'Overall Health Score' assessment, painting a picture of the healthcare ecosystem for residents.
The foundation of any health assessment lies in the availability of primary care physicians. In the context of Alum Bridge (26321), the situation presents both challenges and opportunities. Due to its rural nature, the area likely experiences a lower density of physicians compared to urban centers. This scarcity can translate into longer wait times for appointments and potentially limited choices for patients. The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical metric here. Ideally, this ratio should be calculated using data specific to 26321, but publicly available information often aggregates data at the county level. Therefore, we must use the county as a proxy. Upshur County, where Alum Bridge is located, might have a physician-to-patient ratio that is less favorable than the national average, suggesting a potential shortage of primary care providers.
Standout practices within the area would significantly improve the overall health score. These practices are defined as those that demonstrate excellence in patient care, utilize advanced technologies, and offer a wide range of services. Identifying these practices requires research into local healthcare providers, their accreditations, patient reviews, and the breadth of services offered. Do any practices specialize in chronic disease management? Are there any clinics that cater to specific populations, such as seniors or veterans? The presence of such specialized or exemplary practices boosts the overall health score.
Telemedicine adoption is a crucial factor in rural healthcare. Telemedicine bridges geographical barriers, allowing patients to access healthcare services remotely. This includes virtual consultations, remote monitoring of vital signs, and online access to health information. The degree to which primary care physicians and specialists in 26321 have embraced telemedicine will influence the health score. Are virtual appointments readily available? Do practices offer online patient portals for communication and accessing medical records? The more integrated telemedicine is, the higher the health score.
Mental health resources are an essential component of overall well-being. Access to mental health professionals, including psychiatrists, psychologists, and therapists, is vital. The availability of these resources within or near 26321 is a key factor. Are there mental health clinics in the area? Does the local hospital offer mental health services? Are there support groups or community resources available for individuals struggling with mental health challenges? The more comprehensive the mental health support system, the better the overall health score.
The health score is also influenced by the presence of ancillary services. Are there readily accessible pharmacies? Are diagnostic services, such as X-rays and lab tests, available locally? Proximity to a hospital or emergency room is also a critical factor, particularly in a rural setting. The availability of these supporting services enhances the overall healthcare ecosystem and contributes to a higher health score.
Assessing the healthcare landscape in 26321 requires considering the impact of socioeconomic factors. The health of a community is inextricably linked to its economic well-being. Factors such as poverty levels, access to healthy food, and educational attainment influence health outcomes. A community with higher rates of poverty and lower educational attainment may face greater health challenges. These factors must be considered when evaluating the overall health score, as they can significantly impact the accessibility and effectiveness of healthcare services.
The overall health score for 26321, therefore, is not a static number. It is a dynamic assessment based on the interplay of several factors. The physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, the accessibility of mental health resources, the availability of ancillary services, and the socioeconomic context all contribute to the overall picture.
To improve the health score, several interventions could be considered. Recruiting more primary care physicians to the area would be a priority. Promoting the adoption of telemedicine by existing practices can increase access to care. Expanding mental health services, perhaps through partnerships with local organizations, is also crucial. Supporting community initiatives that address socioeconomic disparities can indirectly improve health outcomes.
The overall health score for 26321, while likely facing challenges due to its rural setting, can be improved through strategic interventions. The availability of primary care physicians, the adoption of telemedicine, and the accessibility of mental health resources are key areas for improvement. The overall health score is a reflection of the community's commitment to the well-being of its residents.
The ongoing assessment of the health landscape in 26321 should be a continuous process. Regular monitoring of the physician-to-patient ratio, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources is essential. Gathering feedback from patients and healthcare providers can provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system.
The health score should be viewed as a tool for continuous improvement. By identifying areas for improvement and implementing targeted interventions, the community can work towards creating a healthier and more vibrant environment for all its residents.
The complexities of healthcare in any given area demand a visual representation. To truly understand the spatial distribution of healthcare resources, the location of providers, and the demographics of the population, a map is essential. CartoChrome maps can provide this visual context, helping to identify gaps in care, pinpoint areas of need, and facilitate informed decision-making.
**Ready to visualize the health landscape of Alum Bridge (26321) and beyond? Explore the power of CartoChrome maps to gain a deeper understanding of healthcare accessibility and resource distribution. Contact CartoChrome today to learn how maps can transform your healthcare analysis!**
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like