26325, Auburn, West Virginia Overall Health Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 26325, Auburn, West Virginia is 10 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 26325 has some form of health insurance. 80.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 44.12 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 26325 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 13 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 26325. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 83 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 101 health care providers accessible to residents in 26325, Auburn, West Virginia.

## Overall Health Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 26325 & Primary Care Availability in Auburn

Assessing the overall health landscape within a specific geographic area requires a multi-faceted approach, considering various factors that contribute to the well-being of its residents. This analysis will delve into the availability and quality of healthcare in ZIP Code 26325, focusing on physician access and resources, and then compare this to the primary care environment in Auburn, offering a comparative perspective on healthcare access.

ZIP Code 26325, representing a specific geographical area, provides a starting point for evaluating healthcare accessibility. The initial step involves determining the physician-to-patient ratio. This metric is crucial for understanding the potential burden on existing healthcare providers. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced patient access, and potentially, a strain on the existing healthcare infrastructure. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests greater accessibility and the possibility of more individualized care. The availability of specialists, such as cardiologists, neurologists, and endocrinologists, also plays a significant role. Residents needing specialized care may face travel distances or delays if these specialists are scarce.

Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of care must be assessed. This includes the reputation of the practices, their patient satisfaction ratings, and the range of services offered. Identifying standout practices within the ZIP code requires research into patient reviews, accreditation status, and the adoption of innovative healthcare models. Are there practices recognized for their excellence in specific areas, such as chronic disease management or preventative care? Are they utilizing electronic health records effectively to improve care coordination? These factors contribute to the overall health score.

Telemedicine adoption is another critical aspect of modern healthcare. The ability to consult with a doctor remotely, via video or phone, can significantly improve access, particularly for those in rural areas or with mobility limitations. Examining the availability of telehealth services within 26325, including the types of services offered and the ease of access, is essential. This includes assessing whether local practices offer telehealth options, if they accept various insurance plans for virtual visits, and if they have the necessary infrastructure for effective virtual consultations.

Mental health resources are an integral part of overall health. The availability of psychiatrists, therapists, and counselors within the ZIP code is crucial. Access to mental health services is often a significant challenge, and understanding the local landscape of mental healthcare providers, including their capacity to accept new patients and the types of therapies offered, is essential. This includes assessing the availability of support groups, crisis intervention services, and mental health education programs.

Shifting the focus to Auburn, a comparative analysis of primary care availability is warranted. Auburn, with its potentially different demographics and healthcare infrastructure, offers a contrasting perspective. The physician-to-patient ratio in Auburn’s primary care sector should be compared to that of 26325. This comparison highlights potential disparities in access to care. Are there more primary care physicians per capita in Auburn, or is the situation similar or worse? This comparison can highlight areas where resources are lacking and where improvements are needed.

The types of primary care practices in Auburn should also be examined. Are there large, multi-specialty practices, or are there more independent practitioners? The structure of the practices can influence the range of services offered and the level of care coordination. The availability of after-hours care, weekend appointments, and same-day appointments is another critical factor in assessing the accessibility of primary care.

Furthermore, the adoption of technology in Auburn's primary care practices should be assessed. Are electronic health records widely used? Do practices offer patient portals for secure communication and access to medical information? The integration of technology can improve efficiency, enhance communication, and empower patients to manage their health.

The availability of mental health resources within Auburn's primary care practices is also a critical consideration. Do primary care physicians offer integrated mental health services, or do they have partnerships with mental health providers? Integrated care models, where mental and physical health services are provided in a coordinated manner, can improve patient outcomes and reduce barriers to care.

Comparing the two locations, 26325 and Auburn, reveals the strengths and weaknesses of each area's healthcare landscape. The comparison can help identify areas where improvements are needed. For example, if 26325 has a lower physician-to-patient ratio than Auburn, it may indicate a need to recruit more physicians to the area. If Auburn has a more robust telehealth infrastructure, it could serve as a model for 26325.

Ultimately, the overall health score for both locations is not a static number but a dynamic assessment that evolves over time. Regular monitoring of key indicators, such as physician-to-patient ratios, patient satisfaction, and the adoption of innovative healthcare models, is essential for ensuring that healthcare resources are meeting the needs of the community. This includes tracking changes in the availability of specialists, the expansion of telemedicine services, and the growth of mental health resources.

Understanding the healthcare landscape requires a visual and interactive approach. To gain a comprehensive understanding of the geographical distribution of healthcare resources, the locations of practices, and the availability of services, consider utilizing the power of CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps provide a visual representation of the data, allowing for a more intuitive understanding of the healthcare landscape.