The Provider Score for the Overall Health Score in 26801, Baker, West Virginia is 42 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 92.86 percent of the residents in 26801 has some form of health insurance. 58.12 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 69.11 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 26801 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 230 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 26801. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 438 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 0 health care providers accessible to residents in 26801, Baker, West Virginia.
Health Scores in 26801, Baker, West Virginia
| Overall Health Score | 77 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 90 |
| Provider Score | 42 |
| Hospital Score | 65 |
| Travel Score | 36 |
| 26801 | Baker | West Virginia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The health landscape within ZIP Code 26801, encompassing the town of Baker, West Virginia, presents a complex picture. An 'Overall Health Score' analysis, factoring in primary care availability and the broader healthcare ecosystem, reveals both strengths and weaknesses. This assessment delves into key metrics, including physician-to-patient ratios, practice quality, telemedicine integration, and mental health resources, offering a nuanced understanding of healthcare access and quality in this rural community.
The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator. Rural areas often face challenges in attracting and retaining medical professionals. A low physician-to-patient ratio can indicate limited access to care, leading to longer wait times for appointments, increased travel distances, and potential delays in diagnosis and treatment. Data on the exact ratio for 26801 requires specific, up-to-date information. However, it is reasonable to assume, given the rural nature of the area, that the ratio might be less favorable than in more urbanized regions. This necessitates proactive strategies to improve access.
Assessing the quality of available primary care practices is also vital. This involves evaluating factors such as the qualifications and experience of the physicians, the range of services offered, the availability of after-hours care, and patient satisfaction. Standout practices, if any, would be those that demonstrate excellence in these areas. This could include clinics with a strong track record of positive patient outcomes, those employing advanced technologies, or those actively involved in community outreach programs. Identifying these practices highlights best practices that could be emulated by others.
Telemedicine adoption is a crucial element in addressing healthcare access issues in rural communities. Telemedicine allows patients to consult with physicians remotely, reducing the need for travel and potentially expanding access to specialists. The extent of telemedicine integration in 26801 would be a significant factor in the overall health score. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering virtual appointments, remote monitoring, and other telehealth services, would likely receive higher marks.
Mental health resources are another critical consideration. Rural areas often face challenges in providing adequate mental healthcare, including a shortage of psychiatrists, therapists, and counselors. The availability of mental health services, including access to mental health professionals, support groups, and crisis intervention resources, would significantly impact the overall health score. The presence of integrated behavioral health services within primary care practices would be particularly beneficial, streamlining access to mental healthcare.
Evaluating the overall health score also requires considering factors beyond the immediate availability of primary care. This includes the presence of local hospitals or clinics, the availability of specialty care, the accessibility of pharmacies, and the overall health of the population. Data on chronic disease prevalence, preventative care utilization, and other health indicators would provide a more comprehensive picture of the community's health status.
The specific practices within 26801 need individual evaluation. This would involve a review of their websites, patient reviews, and other publicly available information. The presence of board-certified physicians, the availability of electronic health records, and the implementation of patient-centered care models would all be positive indicators. The integration of technology, such as online patient portals and telehealth capabilities, would also be important.
The assessment of mental health resources should focus on identifying available providers, including psychiatrists, psychologists, licensed clinical social workers, and licensed professional counselors. It would also include an evaluation of the availability of mental health support groups, crisis intervention services, and substance abuse treatment programs. The presence of partnerships between primary care practices and mental health providers would be a significant advantage.
The overall health score is not a static measure. It reflects the dynamic nature of healthcare and the ongoing efforts to improve access and quality. Regular assessments are necessary to track progress, identify areas for improvement, and ensure that the community's healthcare needs are being met. This includes monitoring the physician-to-patient ratio, tracking telemedicine adoption rates, and assessing the availability of mental health resources.
Addressing the challenges faced by rural communities requires a multifaceted approach. This includes attracting and retaining healthcare professionals, expanding telemedicine services, increasing access to mental healthcare, and promoting preventative care. Collaboration between healthcare providers, community organizations, and government agencies is essential. Investing in healthcare infrastructure, such as upgrading medical facilities and expanding broadband internet access, is also crucial.
The 'Overall Health Score' for 26801 is a complex metric reflecting many factors. The assessment of primary care availability in Baker is just one component. The final score would reflect the interplay of all these elements. The ability to visualize and analyze these data spatially can be invaluable.
For a comprehensive, spatially-driven understanding of healthcare resources in 26801 and beyond, consider exploring the interactive mapping capabilities offered by CartoChrome maps. Their platform allows for detailed visualization of physician locations, healthcare facility locations, and other relevant data, providing a powerful tool for healthcare professionals, policymakers, and community members.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like