The Provider Score for the Prostate Cancer Score in 35572, Houston, Alabama is 13 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 92.71 percent of the residents in 35572 has some form of health insurance. 28.54 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 76.37 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 35572 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 126 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 35572. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 347 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 55 health care providers accessible to residents in 35572, Houston, Alabama.
Health Scores in 35572, Houston, Alabama
Prostate Cancer Score | 8 |
---|---|
People Score | 37 |
Provider Score | 13 |
Hospital Score | 35 |
Travel Score | 27 |
35572 | Houston | Alabama | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
**Prostate Cancer Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 35572 & Primary Care Availability in Houston**
This analysis delves into the landscape of prostate cancer care within ZIP code 35572 and assesses primary care availability in Houston, providing a Prostate Cancer Score based on several key factors. The goal is to offer a comprehensive overview, highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement in accessing quality healthcare, particularly concerning prostate cancer diagnosis and management.
**ZIP Code 35572: A Focused Examination**
ZIP code 35572, located in a specific geographic area, presents a unique set of challenges and opportunities concerning prostate cancer care. The availability of specialized medical professionals, the accessibility of diagnostic tools, and the overall awareness of prostate cancer within the community are crucial elements to consider.
One of the primary concerns is the physician-to-patient ratio. A low ratio, meaning fewer doctors per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, delayed diagnoses, and potentially poorer patient outcomes. Data collection on the specific number of urologists, oncologists, and primary care physicians (PCPs) practicing within the ZIP code is vital. This data should be compared to national averages and regional benchmarks to determine the adequacy of the current healthcare infrastructure.
The quality of primary care is also a critical factor. PCPs often serve as the first point of contact for patients experiencing symptoms or concerns related to prostate health. Their ability to recognize early warning signs, order appropriate screening tests (such as PSA tests), and make timely referrals to specialists is essential. The presence of PCPs who are well-versed in prostate cancer screening guidelines and treatment options is a significant advantage for residents of 35572.
Beyond the number of physicians, the quality of care is paramount. Identifying standout practices within the ZIP code that demonstrate excellence in prostate cancer management is crucial. These practices might be recognized for their use of advanced diagnostic technologies, their adherence to evidence-based treatment protocols, or their commitment to patient education and support. Investigating patient satisfaction scores, treatment outcomes, and the availability of support services, such as support groups and counseling, can help identify these exemplary practices.
Telemedicine adoption is another area of consideration. The ability to access healthcare remotely, through video consultations or other digital platforms, can be particularly beneficial for residents of rural or underserved areas. Telemedicine can improve access to specialists, reduce travel burdens, and facilitate timely follow-up care. Evaluating the extent to which doctors in 35572 utilize telemedicine for prostate cancer-related services is important.
Mental health resources are often overlooked in the context of cancer care, but they play a vital role in patient well-being. A cancer diagnosis and treatment can have a significant impact on a patient's emotional and psychological health. Assessing the availability of mental health professionals, such as psychologists, psychiatrists, and counselors, who specialize in oncology or have experience working with cancer patients is essential. Integrating mental health services into the overall care plan can improve patient outcomes and quality of life.
**Primary Care Availability in Houston: A Broader Perspective**
Houston, as a major metropolitan area, presents a different set of challenges and opportunities. The sheer size of the city and its diverse population create a complex healthcare landscape. Assessing primary care availability in Houston requires a broader perspective, considering factors such as geographic distribution, insurance coverage, and socioeconomic disparities.
The geographic distribution of PCPs is a critical factor. Are primary care physicians evenly distributed throughout the city, or are there underserved areas where access to care is limited? Analyzing the density of PCPs in different neighborhoods and comparing it to population demographics can reveal potential disparities in access to care.
Insurance coverage is another significant consideration. The ability to afford healthcare is a major barrier for many individuals. Assessing the percentage of Houston residents with health insurance, as well as the types of insurance plans available, can help determine the affordability of primary care services.
Socioeconomic disparities can also impact access to care. Low-income communities may face additional barriers, such as transportation challenges, language barriers, and a lack of health literacy. Addressing these disparities requires targeted interventions, such as community outreach programs, culturally sensitive healthcare services, and financial assistance programs.
The integration of primary care with specialty care is also essential. Effective communication and collaboration between PCPs and specialists, such as urologists and oncologists, are crucial for providing coordinated and comprehensive care. Evaluating the extent to which Houston healthcare providers utilize electronic health records (EHRs) and other technologies to facilitate communication and care coordination is important.
**Prostate Cancer Score: Synthesis and Recommendations**
Based on the analysis of factors in both ZIP code 35572 and Houston, a Prostate Cancer Score can be developed. This score would be a composite measure, incorporating data on physician-to-patient ratios, access to diagnostic tools, the quality of primary care, the availability of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources.
The score would provide a valuable benchmark for assessing the overall quality of prostate cancer care in these areas. It would also highlight areas for improvement, such as increasing the number of specialists, expanding telemedicine services, and improving access to mental health resources.
In ZIP code 35572, for example, if the physician-to-patient ratio is low, the score would be negatively impacted. If telemedicine adoption is limited, the score would be further reduced. Conversely, if there are standout practices with excellent patient outcomes and readily available mental health support, the score would be positively influenced.
In Houston, the score would reflect the broader challenges of access to care. Areas with high PCP density and good insurance coverage would contribute to a higher score. Conversely, underserved areas with limited access to care would negatively impact the score.
**Conclusion**
Understanding the complexities of prostate cancer care requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis provides a framework for evaluating the healthcare landscape in specific geographic areas. By focusing on key indicators such as physician availability, quality of care, and access to resources, we can identify strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement.
To visualize and analyze the spatial distribution of healthcare resources, access patient demographics, and gain deeper insights into prostate cancer care within your area, explore the interactive maps and data visualizations available through CartoChrome. Use the tools to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape and make informed decisions about your health.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like